Jump to content

Make setting lever spring


canthus

Recommended Posts

I am having trouble sourcing setting lever springs for older watch movements.  Either they are not available anywhere or economically not viable, so I thought I might try and make my own.  I have most of the drills, files stones etc but don't really know what steel material I need.  I know about tempering and hardening etc, so just need advice on readily obtainable material.  Maybe thicker stock than final form as easier to work with but any help from the many sages on this forum is appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hacksaw blades are good source of steel but I've never tried a set lever bridge.

Thought about it and if I had no other option I would

1. Mark out the piece on the hacksaw blade stock.

2. Drill the holes and triple check that they are correct (this includes the bit which 'clicks' when you pull the crown).

3. Drill the inside corners.

4. Drill holes along the perimeter so that you can cut between them.

5. Rough shape using a dremel and Hand-file to finished shape.

6. Thin down to correct size.

 

Good luck and share if you've managed to maked one!

Anil

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your ideas.  Wire is unlikely to work as I am talking about a flat plate bridge type spring.  I have plenty of small hacksaw blades and also some unused feeler gauges which may do the job. Not sure if my HSS drills would work on these materials, so would I need to anneal it first to soften it, or would carbide drills work without softening?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

O1 or 1095 would be good choices. It's available in numerous thicknesses, generally with 1095 having more options in the thin sizes, you'd have to check suppliers in your area to see what they offer. It's quite hard to find it in the very thin thicknesses useful for watch parts, except in the already heat treated state. You can anneal it though, which would make working it far easier.

 

Just a quick look and I found these guys, https://springsteelstock.co.uk/ they say that they are "the small order specialists" which sounds very encouraging, and they offer 1095 from 0.1mm to over 1.5mm in thickness- I'd try them out. They say it's generally offered in heat treated state but that implies that they can sell it annealed as well. For watch work 0.3mm and 0.4mm would cover 90% of what you might want to make.

 

I would stay away from hacksaw blades, they are often a mix of HSS and carbon steel, I don't think it would anneal very well and would be a bear to heat treat.

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most helpful nickelsilver.  I know this company from my working days, they are a large distributor of sheet steel.  Their single sheet may be far too big for me.  I'll get my beans in a row re thickness etc and may drop them an email to see if they can let me have a small sample or off-cut FOC,  you never know!! I see they do an annealed stainless spring steel which may be suitable.

Edited by canthus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A friend of mine in the U.S. contacted a supplier some years back for 1095 and when they figured out what he wanted the guy said look, why don't we send you some "samples"; I think they wanted to help my friend but to actually sell him the quantity he needed would have been too much hassle haha. He's still using what they sent!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have any experience of what colour you would take a plate/cover type set lever spring to, to make it durable as a spring. Smiths are notorious for broken set lever springs and I think that relates to the tempering.

I did have a beautiful Patek Philippe movement a while back which had a graduated colour change on the set lever spring which at the very least looked impressive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Problem with working with thin steel is that its quite difficult to get to shape.. especially for a set lever bridge which has the 'spring' portion built into it. That's why I think its easier to start with a thicker piece and get the shape correct and then thin it down to the correct thickness.

If anyone has done this please share!

Anilv

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I make parts like this (frequently) I start with stock as close to the desired finished thickness as possible. 2 or 3 hundredths of a millimeter is plenty for finishing. Taking more than that off is a long process, and there's the possibility that it gets thinned unevenly.

 

The old school technique for a set bridge would be to shellac/glue/soft solder the old part with the broken bit in place to the metal stock. Now you can drill through the original holes, and with a jeweler saw and files it's pretty quick work to shape it up using the original as your template. When you're happy with it remove the original and heat treat.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/1/2020 at 3:30 AM, rodabod said:

Smiths are notorious for broken set lever springs and I think that relates to the tempering.

The main issue is shape, not tempering. Spring arms notorious of breaking are usually too thick and/or too short and their form ignores the internal torque. 

Frank

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all your ideas and thoughts, several options for me to explore.  Have to put on the back burner for a while as other priorities at the moment.  Will post my failures/successes in due course, but still open for suggestions/techniques etc.

I think the shape reverts back to the old engineering gremlin of stress raisers which could be shape, radii in corners, scratchy finishes etc etc so will pay due attention to these and probably try and polish these areas a bit.  Would a wiggly shaped arm (spring part) be better than a straight arm ????

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • in general this shouldn't be any change. but in general questions like this it be nice to know the specifics of the watch in other words how was it performing before it was cased up and what is it doing now.
    • just as a reminder this watch is a Swatch group product. This will bring up a problem like spare parts and technical information. that I found some links to some information on when I talk about your watch and some of the technical and basically your watch is equivalent to 2834-2 for which I'm attaching the technical sheets. But equivalent does not mean exactly the same you want to do a search on the group for C07 as we discussed this watch before including the technical differences how it's supposed to be regulated and basically because it's watch group there is no parts availability. https://calibercorner.com/eta-caliber-c07-xxx/   https://www.chrono24.com/magazine/eta-movements-from-the-2824-2-to-the-powermatic-80-p_80840/ https://www.watchuseek.com/threads/h-10-movement-details.4636991/ eta CT_2834-2_FDE_481857_15.pdf
    • people be honest.... Swatch is evil for the watchmakers and repairers, BUT not everything in watches from Switzerland is from the Swatch-Group. As far as i know, Selitta got sacked by Swatch as a Movement-Assembler for them and they started to produce Movements in their own Name with slight Modifications. As far as i know, they sell Parts to the Market for their Movements. In most cases, if a ETA-Movement fails, it is a valid Option to replace it with a Selitta Movement, which i consider the Solution for this Mess with the Swatch-Group...... I have no Connection to anybody at Selitta, but being a Swiss-Guy, i still like to have Swiss-Made Watches, but not from the Swatch-Group.   ok ? regards, Ernst
    • Just one more greedy act by Swatch. They started a number of years ago here in the US..cutting off supplies to watchmakers that could build complications that many Swatch houses couldn't even touch. Old school masters who had gone through some of the most prestigious houses in the world. Otto Frei has some statements on their page about it. I tell all my customers to avoid new Swiss watches like the plague,..unless they just want an older one in their collection that still has some parts out on the market, or they have really deep pockets and don't mind waiting months and paying through the nose to get it back. Plenty of others to choose from..IE Seiko,..or other non-swiss brands Even a number of Chinese brands are catching up with the Swiss,..and I think that in time, their actions will be their downfall
    • Yes. If that's not what you are experiencing...start looking for something rubbing. A 1st guess is that one of the hands is rubbing against the hole in the center of the dial. Especially if you now have lower amplitude in face up/ face down positions.
×
×
  • Create New...