Jump to content

Dial feet repair - All techniques


Recommended Posts

  • 7 months later...

Can anyone advise?

I got given a cheap ebay Seiko 7009a for my birthday a while back to play with. Not in the best of conditions but I usually stick to pocket watches so this was something to play along with. I've got it running again after changing the balance and cleaning out the lower pivot jewel and am now looking at the dial. It has no dial feet but I can see where they were originally on the back. They're right near the edge and on the dial side, the chapter ring covers the edge so any heat damage would be covered. 

I saw one of Balogh's video's and thought I'd may as well have a try. The dial is brass so I cleaned up around the original foot position with a file. I have some 0.6 mm copper wire and was using electrical flux and solder but I can't get the two to stick together. Can anyone suggest anything? Different flux or solder maybe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 07/10/2017 at 12:07 PM, mistergrumpy said:

Can anyone advise?

I got given a cheap ebay Seiko 7009a for my birthday a while back to play with. Not in the best of conditions but I usually stick to pocket watches so this was something to play along with. I've got it running again after changing the balance and cleaning out the lower pivot jewel and am now looking at the dial. It has no dial feet but I can see where they were originally on the back. They're right near the edge and on the dial side, the chapter ring covers the edge so any heat damage would be covered. 

I saw one of Balogh's video's and thought I'd may as well have a try. The dial is brass so I cleaned up around the original foot position with a file. I have some 0.6 mm copper wire and was using electrical flux and solder but I can't get the two to stick together. Can anyone suggest anything? Different flux or solder maybe?

Hi, I use solder with flux already in it, I have always found that using a separate flux it tends to burn off to quickly. I would also tin the area on the brass and on the copper first as well by putting solder on it and this will aid the flow of the solder when you try to make the join. It could also be your soldering iron is not upto the job as the brass will be acting as a heat sink, again I use a temperature controlled soldering iron that you can turn up to compensate. Hope this helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2017. 10. 13. at 1:50 AM, PJA said:

I've found this video for a pocket watch, but it might help with some sort of how to go about it as well. Just in case it's not too late.

You just found my video again  :D

On 2017. 10. 13. at 3:31 AM, vinn3 said:

i reccomend "tining"  for most soldering jobs.   with watch dials ,  pin locating and  overheating the dial are the big problems.   vin

Above i am shiwing an easy method how to find the point ;)

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, szbalogh said:

You just found my video again  :D

Above i am shiwing an easy method how to find the point ;)

It seems that you are putting these videos to teach us and I'm pointing them to those who need them, so in a way, we're teamed to help when possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

hi everyone!
I feel that people are still hesitant about the price and the difficulty of operating the dialer.
Recently I found a good seller with good price, it combines tin paste very easily
I bought his 220v version, I started work pretty easily and quickly than any video I have seen before.
My friend bought another one on ebay for $ 230 which did not include shipping cost and compared to the new one I bought really different electricity,
I bought the current can be twice as strong, solder quickly about 2 seconds
Due to the use of tin paste, the solder is quite beautiful and does not have too much tin.

 

This is the link he sent me 

 

 

Sorry i used gg tránlate.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

a timely topic revival...i've thinking how i would make a resistance solderer for dial feet for a current project

For you experience guys, would you say the two posts (feet) are always 180 degrees apart, ie a line through them also goes through the centre.....or are they sometimes offset, ie a line through them would be part of a chord?

I've been think that as well as making the solder joint, some sort of position would be nice and how to do so will depending on the answer to the above.  I can imagine the frustration at getting a perfect solder joint only to find the pins don't align with the holes.

Edited by measuretwice
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Cougarnaut said:

No, the positions can differ, I solved the problem like this: http://dirkfassbender.de/dial-feet-position-gauge.html

 

 

thanks......random locations complicates things but I suppose its to be expected.  Can you comment on how the your fixture is used.  I see from other posts you are soldering, but am unsure how the set up goes from locating with plastic arms to soldering without the plastic arms

Edited by measuretwice
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi all,

I have a dial with broken feet, unfortunately.

I read most advice to resolder them with a special welding machine, which I don't have, and could potentially cause a spot on the dial due to overheating.

So I keep searching and I found some advice the use of JB weld, a specific 2 components glue.

Does anybody have experience on this glue?

Thanks a lot in advance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Massimo said:

 

Hi all,

I have a dial with broken feet, unfortunately.

I read most advice to resolder them with a special welding machine, which I don't have, and could potentially cause a spot on the dial due to overheating.

So I keep searching and I found some advice the use of JB weld, a specific 2 components glue.

Does anybody have experience on this glue?

Thanks a lot in advance

Are you working on a Seiko 5 or similar? use thin bi-adhesive tape and place some on the movement ring. Or get "dial pads" which in practice are the same thing. Gluing is unlikely to be effective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you working on a Seiko 5 or similar? use thin bi-adhesive tape and place some on the movement ring. Or get "dial pads" which in practice are the same thing. Gluing is unlikely to be effective.
Thanks Jdm,
Indeed it's a 4r36, seiko 5.
I honestly dislike the idea of the double side tape... As a concept.
I agree it is fast, easy, and (temporarily) effective, without risk of damage.
But in the long term it might move.
Additionally the feet are kept in a plastic hole by interference, without screws so it must be a good bond if I want to reattach them.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Massimo said:

Indeed it's a 4r36, seiko 5.
I honestly dislike the idea of the double side tape... As a concept.

I agree it is fast, easy, and (temporarily) effective, without risk of damage.
But in the long term it might move.

Additionally the feet are kept in a plastic hole by interference, without screws so it must be a good bond if I want to reattach them.

It will not move, and the concept of repairing is to get the job done, not being purists on a $70 watch.

Anyway, exactly because the feet are a tight fit in the ring, they will stress the gluing point and break it, just like it broke the original soldering. So you will have to make the glue blob bigger, now it will push on the ring and the dial won't be flush. Then you start reaming out the hole the ring to make space... lot of effort for a patchy job that is the end is worse than adhesive tape. But I guess that not having been there before you'll need to experience first hand... have fun :biggrin:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 or 2 people were swearing by that JB weld for attaching new dial feet at one point on the forum, but when I tried it i found it was only a shade less than completely useless, I don't know if I'm doing something wrong but I've never been able to get any kind of cement to bond properly between the replacement copper dial feet i have and the dial, always snaps off without barely any effort.

I think short of special, costly welding equipment you have to accept that dial dots/strips are your best shot, it's the kind of thing that irks most repairers, we all want a better way of doing it i think, but it usually works out okay, at least if the movement ring is a fairly tight fit in the case. 
 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi all,
Thanks a lot for the support, indeed I have the original pins but it's clear that the contact surface, using even a good glue, is too small.
Maybe using that feet with a larger head could help, increasing the area of contact.
I'll order both and give it a try.
Fingers crossed...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • See, what has happen is a normal consequece of the reducing the hammer size and changing it's shape by the removing metal from it. But here the hammer is adjustable and just adjustment is needed to correct, and this is what You have done. There is a rule for the adjustment and it is that the hammer must lay firmly on the seconds counter heart and there should be a litle free play in the same time of the minutes counter heart/hammer which alows counter movement of about 0.5 min on the small dial hand (+/- 0.25). Of course, there is no way to make one hammer to delay from the other, as they are one single part. What has changed too is the slope of the hammer head and thus the orientation of the heart has changed, and thus the switching finger position. This led to need of the finger position correction. The rule here is that switching of the minute counter has to start when the seconds counter hand is on '59'. Of course, the seconds hand must be positioned as so the resetting is at '0' exactly. If switching is earlier than 59, there will be no problem, but it will be wrong as reading can be not correct. If the switching starts later, the problems that You described can happen.
    • Thanks, This watch was in a box of old scrape units that a friend gave me. They used to be his late father's who was a watchmaker before the war and then continued later in life. I picked this one out as it looked like it had potential, and I liked the dial, it's been a bit of a learning curve for a beginner but I was determined to get it going. Now I'm on the final lap it feels good. I'm just wondering whether to invest in a decent set of hand placement tools or stick with the cheap Chinese red thing I have, decisions decision 😆
    • An update, for everyone who contributed advice, and for those who come after with a similar problem. Based on the answers received, I decided to work on the face of the hammer first. I used a square degussit stone to guarantee a vertical surface to work against, and ground the face back until it was square across 90% of the depth. I was conscious of the risk of removing too much material.* After I'd got the shape how I wanted it, I polished the surface with lapping film. To cut a long story short, it did the trick and the hammer hasn't slipped off the cam since. Of course, that wasn't the end of my problems. Have a look at this video and tell me what you think is wrong. https://youtu.be/sgAUMIPaw98 The first four attempts show (0 to 34 sec.) the chrono seconds hand jumping forwards, the next two attempts (35 to 47 sec.) seem "normal", then on the seventh attempt (48 to 54 sec.) the seconds hand jumps to 5 sec. and the minute counter jumps to 1. The rest of the video just shows repeats of these three variants. I solved it by rotating the minute counter finger on the chronograph (seconds) runner relative to the cam.  I'd be interested to hear your opinions on that. It seemed to be the right thing to do, but maybe I've introduced another problem I'm not aware of. * What is the correct relationship between the two hammers and cams, by the way? Should both hammers strike the cams exactly at the same time, or is it correct for the minute counter hammer to be a bit behind the seconds hammer? In this picture, I removed the adjusting screw at 1, and the hammers are contacting the cams simultaneously at 3 and 4. I had to turn the screw down tight to achieve this condition after stoning the seconds hammer and replacing the bridge.
    • It was easy enough to pop off. Once I had the cannon pinion hanging on the blades of the stump, I got my #2 tweezers on the gear attached to the staff and levered it down. That way none of the force was on the brass wheel itself.   I reinstalled it and the bridge, and it looks like a small but reasonable amount of end shake. It also spins easily with a blower. It stops quickly, but I think that's due to the large shoulder and about what I'd expect from this wheel.  
    • Oh, right. For some reason I was picturing a monocoque case in my head. Good looking watch!
×
×
  • Create New...