Jump to content

NOS hairspring 180 degrees out of position


gaber

Recommended Posts

Just now, gaber said:

Think these marks were put to tighten the balance cock? 

Maybe if I remove them somehow, this will give the endshake?

Yes! Remove those raised lumps. This may be a sign that the old staff is incorrect.... and possibly some of the other balance parts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, rodabod said:

I think I have a spare cal 1002 which I could send you parts for, but I’m guessing you are not in the UK. 

That's very kind of you to offer.  I live in Germany for my work.  I guess the only thing I need right now is the regulator arm, which I can take of a donor balance cock (about 10Eur online from Italy via EBay).

Removing the lumpy marks worked beautifully!  Now the wheel is spinning:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, rodabod said:

That’s an early anti-shock setting. When you bought the balance complete, was it described as being for anti-shock in any way? Eg. “Inca”?

Re this, the balance was only advertised as N.O.S. for AS 1002.  Nothing about the intended jewel setting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, gaber said:

Re this, the balance was only advertised as N.O.S. for AS 1002.  Nothing about the intended jewel setting.

Well, it appears to fit. Some staff lengths do not vary according to antishock setting. The pivot profiles can vary slightly, but don’t worry about that just now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Loosen cock screw to see if it frees the staff.

The marks( guaged) lowers the jewels which takes out the end shake( free axial end play on staff) removing them like you say might be all you need to do, if still no end  shake,  gauging on the inner bound will furthur raise the jewel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

Loosen cock screw to see if it frees the staff.

The marks( guaged) lowers the jewels which takes out the end shake( free axial end play on staff) removing them like you say might be all you need to do, if still no end  shake,  gauging on the inner bound will furthur raise the jewel.

The marks were the cause.  I rubbed them down and now it spins freely and has a healthy bit of end shake.

Perhaps, years ago, someone tried to compensate for worn pivots by making those marks to the balance cock.  When I got it, the pivots were so worn that it wasn't enough anymore...

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, gaber said:

The marks were the cause.  I rubbed them down and now it spins freely and has a healthy bit of end shake.

Perhaps, years ago, someone tried to compensate for worn pivots by making those marks to the balance cock.  When I got it, the pivots were so worn that it wasn't enough anymore...

Glad to hear this and agree with you 100% , marks were made to compensate for short pivots.

Best wishes joe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/26/2020 at 11:03 PM, rodabod said:

No antishock on the dial side. That may be original. 
 

Let me check mine. 

Hey rodabod.  I just wanted to follow up on this.  Did you you have a chance to investigate your movement?  If it is not compatible, no worries.  There seem to be suitable parts for sale out there.  Thanks again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This kind of shock setting should provide a bit more safety than the one already installed in mine, no?  I have a mind to swap them as long as it doesn't change the fit of the balance wheel.

And thanks!

Edited by gaber
politeness
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • this is something I've never quite understood about the some of the Swiss companies. In 1957 Omega was using 9010 for the keyless parts with epilam. there's been a slow migration towards using heavier lubrication's but still typically oils and epilam to keep them in place. When it seems like 9504 works so much better.  
    • OK, welcome in the world of alarm clocks... I guess the 4th wheel is dished because it is from another movement. If it was not dishet, then it would not mesh with the pinion of the escape wheel, am I right? The marks of wear on the 4th wheel pinion doesn't corespond to the 3th wheel table position, at list this is what i see on the picts. Calculating the rate is easy - there is a formula - BR = T2 x T3 x T4 x T5 x 2 /(P3 x P4 x P5) where T2 - T5 are the counts of the teeth of the wheels tables, and P3 - P5 are the counts of the pinion leaves. Vibrating the balance is easy - grasp for the hairspring where it should stay in the regulator with tweasers, let the balance hang on the hairspring while the downside staff tip rests on glass surface. Then make the balance oscillate and use timer to measure the time for let say 50 oscillations, or count the oscillations for let say 30 seconds. You must do the free oscillations test to check the balance staff tips and the cone cup bearings for wear. This kind of staffs wear and need resharpening to restore the normal function of the balance.
    • Glue a nut to the barrel lid, insert a bolt, pull, disolve the glue.  Maybe someone will have a better answer. 
    • The stress is the force (on the spring) x distance. The maximum stress is at the bottom, and decreases up the arm. That's why they always break at the bottom. I used a round file, then something like 2000 grit to finish. I gave the rest of the arm a quick polish - no need for a perfect finish. Just make sure there are no 'notches' left from cutting/filing. The notches act like the perforations in your toilet paper 🤣
    • It's probably a cardinal rule for watch repair to never get distracted while at the bench. Yesterday, after finishing a tricky mainspring winding/barrel insertion (I didn't have a winder and arbor that fit very well) I mentally shifted down a gear once that hurdle was passed. There were other things going on in the room as I put the barrel and cover into the barrel closer and pressed to get that satisfying snap. But when I took it out I realized I never placed the arbor.  When opening a barrel, we are relying on the arbor to transfer a concentrically-distributed force right where it is needed at the internal center of the lid. However, when that isn't present it's difficult to apply pressure or get leverage considering the recessed position of the lid, the small holes in the barrel and the presence of the mainspring coils. It was a beat-up practice movement so I didn't take a lot of time to think it over and I pushed it out using a short right-angle dental probe placed in from the bottom, but that did leave a bit of a scratch and crease in the thin lid. I had also thought about pulling it using a course-threaded screw with a minor thread diameter smaller than the lid hole and a major diameter larger, but that may have done some damage as well.  Thinking about how this might have been handled had it been a more valuable movement, is there a method using watchmaking or other tools that should extract the lid with the least damage? 
×
×
  • Create New...