Jump to content

sieko sportsmatic, automatic wristwatch


wi33ard

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, wi33ard said:

is there somewhere other than seiko where i can get this item serviced/repaired? thank you

Of course there are independent watch repairers, however be aware that if for example the value of your Vintage Seiko is 100 (USD EUR, GBP,?you didn't event mentioned where are you located), a typical repair / service bill can easily be 200. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Klassiker said:

Lots of places. If you tell us more about yourself (clue: introduce yourself) and describe your watch, someone Here will be able to help. If you are really a Wizzard, I also wish it could be Christmas every day.

If he was a real Wizzard his watch would be working.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, jdm said:

Of course there are independent watch repairers, however be aware that if for example the value of your Vintage Seiko is 100 (USD EUR, GBP,?you didn't event mentioned where are you located), a typical repair / service bill can easily be 200. 

i am in london. the watch has a serial stamped on the rear which reads 805958.what is strange about this watch is that where it might normally say water resistant, this is water proof

14 hours ago, jdm said:

Of course there are independent watch repairers, however be aware that if for example the value of your Vintage Seiko is 100 (USD EUR, GBP,?you didn't event mentioned where are you located), a typical repair / service bill can easily be 200. 

 

10 hours ago, markr said:

If he was a real Wizzard his watch would be working.

i was a real wi33ard, i would not need a watch

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, wi33ard said:

what is strange about this watch is that where it might normally say water resistant, this is water proof

Seiko marked their warchtes water proof until about the end of 1970, and started marking them water resistant since 1969. So yours should probably be a 1970 watch, as its reference indicates (80 = August 1970/80/90...)

This is from 1969

EDIT: Philipk5 in the post below is correct, 80 means October 1968, not August 1970.

7005-8040-back-1969.jpg

Edited by aac58
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, wi33ard said:

i am in london. the watch has a serial stamped on the rear which reads 805958.what is strange about this watch is that where it might normally say water resistant, this is water proof

 

 

There should be some more numbers/letters on the caseback which should help identify the movement.

The use of the words "water proof" was replaced with "water resistant" some time ago (1969ish) by Seiko.

The serial number quoted indicates the watch was made in October of a year ending in 8 (ie 1968, 1978, 1988etc.

Hope this is useful and helps.

(I am pleased with myself for regarding who could do repairs not saying .......Roy Wood!) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I picked up a similar amount of these jewels some years ago in a watch and clock fair. Every now and then they come in handy. This week I've got a rubbed in bombe jewel in the balance cock that is cracked and needs replacing. Very handy to have a vintage assortment of these type of jewels!
    • Great diagram with the teeth and pinion count. Simple way to reduce the speed of the hour wheel by the 12:1 minute wheel. Genius and yet so simple. Always good to reinforce the principal by what you have done in your drawing. Keep doing that. I had a drawing on my wall for years showing me this which is very similar to the drawing you have done. Here's a formula to work out the beats per hour of a watch movement. The movement's BPH is dictated by the wheel teeth and pinion count and the hairspring being vibrated to the correct BPH by finding the pinning up point on the hairspring using a vibrating tool.  The reason in the formula there is X2 on the top line is because there are two pallet stones.
    • So I just wanted to say "thank you" again.  The angle is the key bit it seems and yes, it did basically just fall, or float, back into position when I got it lined up just right. I had meant to add that now that I see how it goes in, I totally see how it came out in the first place, and that whomever cloned the original movement didn't pay much attention to the fine details around the setting or how it interfaces with the balance cock or the "rings" on the regulator and/or stud carrier arms.
    • Well I’ve never seen the make before and cannot find any info, I haven’t got it just yet it’s been left to me among a 1970’s sea master and a mid size yeoman. But if anyone has any information on this one please feel free to enlighten me, many thanks 
×
×
  • Create New...