Jump to content

A question about expected accuracy


Recommended Posts

So I purchased a knockoff Seiko turtle, intentionally, and am not happy with its time keeping ability. Now I originally assumed this was because of its quality, but as I researched into mechanical watches I learned that they are susceptible to outside influences. 

I work factory maintenance and I wear this watch 24 hours a day. I am very active with my hands at my job and there is a lot of jarring motions that would effect the watch.

During the day the watch will run fast, I mean 5 MINUTES fast even when I have it regulated to run 2 to 3 minutes slow overnight. 

My intention is to replaced the movment from what I "believe" is a CH2083M or DG2083M Chinese movment to an SII NH36.

But my question is this, how much of this is the movment and how much is my movment?  Can I expect better accuracy the NH36 or because of how I wear it i will always have problems? Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, JcW said:

So I purchased a knockoff Seiko turtle, 

My intention is to replaced the movment from what I "believe" is a CH2083M or DG2083M Chinese movment to an SII NH36.

Normally fake Seiko use a NH36 because it's cheap and of good quality. You can post a picture if you are in doubt. 

If you need predictable accuracy I recommend that you do not try swapping and the like, just get a quartz watch. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jdm said:

Normally fake Seiko use a NH36 because it's cheap and of good quality. You can post a picture if you are in doubt. 

Yes I knew that before purchasing so I wasn't to worried about it, but when I opened it up after I started having issues this is what I found.

Also I don't NEED predictable accuracy, I just would like to be in the +/- sec per day not minutes.  Currently I am trying to get it be a few minutes slow in the morning and a few minutes fast when I go to bed. If it stayed like that only needing adjustment once a week to bring it back that would be fine.

I am mostly worried about wearing out the crown threads (being a knockoff) they are not the smoothest.

20200919_131919.jpg

20200919_131901.jpg

20200919_131844.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JcW said:

Yes I knew that before purchasing so I wasn't to worried about it, but when I opened it up after I started having issues this is what I found.

You've got the very bottom grade in the  counterfeiting ladder, below how a "regular fake" Seiko is made:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=lFG8AUENQPc

 

Quote

Also I don't NEED predictable accuracy, I just would like to be in the +/- sec per day not minutes. 

Need or like, sorry to be blunt but trying to get accuracy or anything else from that mov.t is like polishing a turd.

Quartz always does good, quality mechanical also can.

Edited by jdm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Klassiker said:

I doubt it is the movement or jarring of your hands. I can't Imagine that being severe enough to cause this behaviour. Are you using a timegrapher to do the regulation? 

Its the only thing that I can find to explain it. If I set the watch on a shelf I can get it to go 8 hours with only a few seconds change. I am not yet using a timegrapher to regulate, this is my first foray into automatic watches. Currently I am just matching it to my last watch, which is a Casio. It slows down while I a sleeping and speeds up when I am awake, and more so while I am at work. Keep in mind that I walk about 6 or 7 miles a night at work, and if I am not moving I am wrenching or running power tools. The harsh environment is the main reason I went with the fake, I didn't want to destroy a $500 watch at work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps I should back a bit. How this started is my father-in-law had this really cool kokopelli watch band, vintage sterling silver tips with a recessed image and stainless expanding band. He had several watches on it but all were pretty simple quartz movments. When he died this year I asked if I could have it.

I decided to do a turquoise and coral inlay(in the end I added brass also) and I wanted a watch to match the turquoise color. This was the only one I found that I liked. I really like the esthetics of this watch so I would like to keep this it albeit with some mod/changes. I would also like to keep it an Automatic or at least mechanical, because I am really enjoying learning about them.

So yes I know I can get a quartz that would be more accurate the 20 dollar Casio that I set this one to fits the bill, but I would like to make this work. I like i said before I am not looking for chronograph accuracy just something I don't have to reset twice a day.

 

received_346577233022299.jpeg

20200827_111905.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, JcW said:

I like i said before I am not looking for chronograph accuracy just something I don't have to reset twice a day.

Get a real Seiko or at least an SII watch. They are the best value ever in automatics, are accurate, robust and widely appreciated. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't agree that this movement is beyond saving, for the level of performance you are looking for. However, you need the right tools and materials to do the work. If you are not able to DIY then the sensible option is to replace the movement. If you are sure that a genuine NH36 will fit, then that would be the was to go.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Klassiker said:

I don't agree that this movement is beyond saving, for the level of performance you are looking for.

You may be right, and I am not just going to through it away either. If the NH36 will work, I assume it would because its a clone but I have to bring my calipers home to make sure, I plan on using this movment as a practice movment while I am learning.

By the way do you have a timegrapher that you recommend?

Edited by JcW
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, jdm said:

Get a real Seiko or at least an SII watch. They are the best value ever in automatics, are accurate, robust and widely appreciated. 

I haven't ruled out getting a SRDP21, I want to see how the fake holds up over time. Actually, the accuracy issue aside, this one is holding up quite well. Better than the Casio and much better than Armitron before that.

20200921_112450.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Klassiker said:

 If you are not able to DIY then the sensible option is to replace the movement. If you are sure that a genuine NH36 will fit, then that would be the way to go.

You think that all sizes, hands, mov.t ring, calendar position, stem height do  match, so to guarantee an easy job and good result to a complete beginner? I know for a fact that is not so, from that my advice not to throw good money after bad, and spare learning efforts for a better cause.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear jdm,

Not sure at all, which is why I qualified my recommend with "If you are sure..."

You are right to list all the things which might not be interchangeable. Perhaps JcW isn't aware of the risk, and perhaps I should have also pointed it out, and if I wasn't in holiday, with a rubbish internet connection and a tablet with an infuriating auto-correct, maybe I would have taken more trouble. Just like you could have stated yesterday already, that an NH36 definitely will not fit. But you didn't.

So thanks for adding more detail. That's the strength of a forum, isn't it? Everyone chips in, all contributions in good faith are gratefully received, and the end result is better than any one of us alone would have produced.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jdm said:

You think that all sizes, hands, mov.t ring, calendar position, stem height do  match, so to guarantee an easy job and good result to a complete beginner? I know for a fact that is not so, from that my advice not to throw good money after bad, and spare learning efforts for a better cause.

I am aware of all these issues. I am also aware of a robust mod community that answers most of these concerns.  I fear this is drifting away from the topic, but what I think I need to determine before I decide if this is feasible is if the movement ring is the same size or if I can swap the ring,if the dial "feet" line up with it, and if the case threads for the crown match aftermarket ones that are available. My hope as a newbie is that they copied it close enough that the answer is yes to at least few of these.

The question I was asking in this topic was if I could expect better results from the NH36.

If the answer is yes then it is worth my time to look I to the feasibility of the swap. I am not afraid of the effort or money on parts, I have a long way to go before I reach the cost the the equivalent Seiko right now (including the toolkit I bought) I am only about $80 in. Also I would truly enjoy making a cheap knockoff into a one of a kind piece of "reasonable" quality. 

However if the answer is no or if I find that nothing from this watch is reusable then I will just keep what I have and deal with its inaccuracies because I absolutely love the way it looks with the band.

Again thank you both for your time and knowledge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, JcW said:

I am aware of all these issues. I am also aware of a robust mod community that answers most of these concerns.

Seiko modders mostly use and swap parts that are made for Seiko, especially SKX007 / 009. That is easy due to the commonality that is built in Seiko 5 and their brothers diver's watches. You can check and ask more details on WUS and SCWF forums.

Quote

I fear this is drifting away from the topic, but what I think I need to determine before I decide if this is feasible is if the movement ring is the same size or if I can swap the ring

It is not the same mov.t ring.

Quote

If the dial "feet" line up with it,

They don't.

Quote

and if the case threads for the crown match aftermarket ones that are available.

Assuming that crown/stem are separate parts, the first stay to thread to a new stem.

Quote

The question I was asking in this topic was if I could expect better results from the NH36.

Of course. We have many topics on it here and as mentioned above already Seiko and SII are quality products that normally deliver exceptional value in the automatic watch market. But as I stated before unless one likes to cobble and glue things together, swapping around dissimilar parts is not the best start to learning asking. My opinion only,

Edited by jdm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think if you want to play Billy big b.ollocks then you have to have something up your sleeve, anyone that knows how to fight, plays dirty. Lets face it a lot of folk that voted for Brexit just rolled uk their sleeves to say up yours EU hoping for good changes. We have idiots for leaders and probably none of them clever enough to clean the shitty stick they were given. I didnt vote, what will be will be.
    • I voted leave too, my reasoning was the the EU is undemocratic, no elected officials. I don't regret it but I  am sad that both sides acted like petulant toddlers.  Shameful.  I'm not on other forums but if I was and left this site, would you shun me? Of course not, we aren't petulant toddlers.  
    • This is a type of tool that may be suitable to remove the bezel - though note that I'm pretty sure the watch should be face down - not face up, as in some of the photos of these tools on amazon & ebay! If you try one one of those, put the movement screws back in first to avoid accidents. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Removal-Professional-Remover-Watchmaker-Diameter/dp/B09XCH4QVN?source=ps-sl-shoppingads-lpcontext&ref_=fplfs&smid=A296NCMMFVXSDN&th=1  
    • Hi, I’m constantly asking my wife to help me with removing the stem in order to complete casing. To expand, this is not a challenge for me when the setting lever is secured by a screw (older calibers). However when the setting lever is attached to a spring loaded setting lever axel, like on more modern calibers, I simply don’t see how to apply enough pressure on the button to get the stem out short of putting the movement face down with the dial and hands attached, which I’m loath to do in order to avoid damaging the dial/hands? what technique should I be using? thanks  
    • Many thanks for your advice (being borne in mind at present) & offer Dell. When I was given the clock the plastic anchor was loose on the arbour (it had split at the 'hole') &, after repairing this, I have been trying to determine whether the spindle (pin) should be perpendicular when the pallet is sitting on a flat surface; or whether, when installed, its L-R extremes (or alternatively its tick & tock points) should lie at equal angles from the vertical when moved with spring absent. I can get the clock to run but in every such configuration the top block has to be turned anti-clockwise (from above) by quite a bit in order to be 'in beat' & it always runs fast (despite the pendulum being set to as slow as possible). This makes me wonder if there is any particular feature of/fault in a torsion spring clock which determines which turn direction (if any) is necessary to get it 'in beat'; & whether there would be a different set of settings that would get it running nearer to time at somewhere around the mid timing/inertia position which would then allow tweaking of the fast/slow setting.
×
×
  • Create New...