Jump to content

Regulating Mido 0917


GeorgeC

Recommended Posts

I have a Mido 0917 a friend asked me to overhaul. Having done so, I can’t seem to get the beat adjustment or the regulation to the tolerance I can with standard regulation setups. This model has what is called a floating hairspring.

Any advice on correcting the beat error?

 

 

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&Mido_0917

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, GeorgeC said:

I can’t seem to get the beat adjustment or the regulation to the tolerance I can with standard regulation setups.

What happens exactly? Any chance of a picture of balance and timegrapher screen?

17 minutes ago, GeorgeC said:

This model has what is called a floating hairspring.

More commonly, free sprung or Breguet HS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We could agree one can call it a free sprung balance.
The thing with these is you regulate the timing with the screws on the balance and the beat error with the regulator arm.
If my memory is correct that small screw on the top is to adjust the distance of the index pins, maybe there is someone with a better memory online who could correct me with this, maybe it was to fintune the beat error.
Just as jdm says it would be interessting to see how you are doing when trying to regulate it.
To correct the beat error you should be able to gently move the regulator arm back and forth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I could not see the forest for the trees on this one.

Thanks alot you two.  I did see the obvious movable beat error component and have the beat right now. 

The regulation of timing is performed by the micro adjusting screw.  All balance wheel screws were smooth without slots for adjustment.  I did notice that the hsprg was not shaped appropriately so each time the +- was moved for timing, the hspg would move to be off centered from the pivot.

I have it running much better now - thanks again.

 

This training example is what I have drawn on for correcting the hairspring https://youtu.be/4EYk787sjAM?t=620

Edited by GeorgeC
further example of correcting hspg forming
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never worked on one of these myself, but hearing from people who have they have nothing but complaints. It's called "incastar regulator" if you want to do more research. From what I can work out in my head as well as anecdotes from other watchmakers, the challenge is keeping the hairspring from going out of round whilst you regulate it. Think you'll have better luck if you put the hairspring into round, not touch the regulator, and manipulate the inertia of the balance itself with the balance screws with say a pin vice. All I can say is good luck with this one.

Edited by CaptCalvin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, HSL said:

We could agree one can call it a free sprung balance.
The thing with these is you regulate the timing with the screws on the balance and the beat error with the regulator arm.
If my memory is correct that small screw on the top is to adjust the distance of the index pins, maybe there is someone with a better memory online who could correct me with this, maybe it was to fintune the beat error.
Just as jdm says it would be interessting to see how you are doing when trying to regulate it.
To correct the beat error you should be able to gently move the regulator arm back and forth.

That knob is in fact what you would use to regulate. It turns rollers that tightly pinch the hairspring. Turn it one way the rollers dispense hairspring, turn it the other way they retract.

I think the drawbacks of such a system is obvious.

Edited by CaptCalvin
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's a good idea - shrinking down the nut and wrench size from the old casebook trick!
    • I missed this earlier. The dial isn't going into the holder, it should sit proud of it. This is what I am currently using which I print for each different movement.    
    • I didn't think pulling to set position would work harden the spring, in that position it is stressed where the arm starts. By work hardening i meant rapid polishing at that point, a bit like polishing a pivot work hardens as it compresses the steel. I doubt polishing by hand would achieve much in that respect though. Its finished, arm polished up mostly at the join to the bridge's main body. I'm ok with it, the screw holes aren't great as i had to open them up by redrilling and positioning it was difficult, I'm not much use with a loupe, opening up with a file might be a better option for me or i could just use the correct drill size 😅. And the detent is way too deep, i had to guess that with the stem release out of position and sat on top, but i only took one measure and went for it, no slowly slowly catch your monkey 😅. First go I'm happy , well sort of, it works and thats a big thing for me, next one will have a bit more finesse.  Anyone thats interested, after filing, i used a 2000 grade home made diamond  micro file and then 20 micron film, the film is much better than wet and dry, more stable to use and doesn't shed cheap grade grit everywhere , then auto polish on a sponge pad.
    • I'm assuming that every time you set the watch you are work hardening the detent spring, maximum hardening is  where it meets the plate due to maximum deflection.   That's why it snaps there.  The Young's modulus may be the same but after it's reached its maximum yeid strength it breaks.  My mechanic engineering is very rusty, correct me if I'm wrong. 
    • Ah ok yes that makes sense to polish it where the arm starts to form from the body of the bridge, i thought you meant the underneath of all the arm.
×
×
  • Create New...