Jump to content

Movement id ?


Recommended Posts

Hi again...

 

Started to take apart an old (50’s ?) Stowa Sport and found a movement I can’t id. It looks like the pivot coming through the cannon pinion for the seconds hands is broken off. Will most likely be a challenge to find a replacement but to even try that I need some more details on the movement.

 

I ”think” I have seen something similar on the keyless side before but can’t remember...

 

I suspect it might be a PUW movement as I read that Stowa used these and Durowe during these times. But there’s so many PUW’s on Ranfft that I thought I might take a chance and through out the question on the forum.

 

Photos are attached.

 

8367e409c52d6ba21018afabd4475705.jpg7ff4cba0e5138e212ee6a49523e78336.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are definitely on to something here...

Osco is a new brand name to me, never heard of that one before.

I did see the OS 66 stamp on the movement but had nothing to connect it with.

Thanks a lot, now I have a starting point for furthet investigation!




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Osco 66 seems to be the general opinion and I tend to agree.

Just took the movement apart and lucky me, I took some photos of the process. This is not your generic swiss design and I would likely have been lost in the assembly process.

Looks like there are actually parts to have. Cousins are fairly well stocked, at least for the Osco 65 parts that comes up when searching for the 66, so I guess they fit in between these movements.

The movement belongs to a very worn case but the dial is nice with passable yellowish patina, so I’ll try to give the thing a 2nd life.

Thanks again for all help!




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So far so good...

Movement is up and running decently with amplitude around 250 and close to zero beat error. Currently off by around +20 sec dial up/down so should be tweakable.

Photo as assembled in cleaned and a bit polished casing with new crystal and re-lumed hands is attached.

I guess I will have to get that centersec-wheel and fit a sec hand before the adventure is over...:-)

I like it when a 2,5 euro investment can be turned around to something decent.


1c809502531d9d0809a8d0f8488c6818.jpg


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems I was too quick to pat myself on the shoulder here..

After a couple of days wearing and winding the watch, the winding started to hack and slip over.

Taking the rocking bar mechanism out, the problem seems to be that the square part of the winding stem that is supposed to fit in the square hole in the winding pinion is worn down or wrong from start and the stem slips over inside the pinion when you turn the stem to wind.

I attached a photo of the stem fitted inside the pinion and find it hard to believe that there should be that difference between hole and stem size.

Measuring the stem, it’s maybe 0,1 mm undersized relative the nominal for the Ronda 382 that’s supposedly the correct one.

Is it the wrong pinion?

If anyone has experience from similar rocking bar designs, I appreciate any feedback.
1387424cc1ab541410c37068214915da.jpg


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I ended up using a rounded punch on the edges of the pinion in the staking set to close the hole i tiny bit. This prevents the stem from rotating freely in the hole and winding now works ok.

Probably a bit unorthodox and maybe frowned upon...?

But I’d rather have a wearable working watch than chuckng it back in the drawer with the other hopeless cases. :-)






Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well since the square part of the winding stem almost fits diagonaly in the winding pinion I would lean towards that stem has a error more than 0.1mm. The square hole on the winding pinion looks nice and crisp.
The winding stem is probably not a correct one for this watch, but of course someone can have changed the winding pinion, likely not since it obviously fits in diameter towards the crown wheel on the rocker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That’s the strange part. Checked the stem again with micrometer and it’s more like 0,05 mm off the nominal for the specified stem.

I can visually see that the corners of the stem has been worn down slightly right where it touches the wheel.

If there had been less size diff between stem and wheel from start, this would never have happened.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • this is something I've never quite understood about the some of the Swiss companies. In 1957 Omega was using 9010 for the keyless parts with epilam. there's been a slow migration towards using heavier lubrication's but still typically oils and epilam to keep them in place. When it seems like 9504 works so much better.  
    • OK, welcome in the world of alarm clocks... I guess the 4th wheel is dished because it is from another movement. If it was not dishet, then it would not mesh with the pinion of the escape wheel, am I right? The marks of wear on the 4th wheel pinion doesn't corespond to the 3th wheel table position, at list this is what i see on the picts. Calculating the rate is easy - there is a formula - BR = T2 x T3 x T4 x T5 x 2 /(P3 x P4 x P5) where T2 - T5 are the counts of the teeth of the wheels tables, and P3 - P5 are the counts of the pinion leaves. Vibrating the balance is easy - grasp for the hairspring where it should stay in the regulator with tweasers, let the balance hang on the hairspring while the downside staff tip rests on glass surface. Then make the balance oscillate and use timer to measure the time for let say 50 oscillations, or count the oscillations for let say 30 seconds. You must do the free oscillations test to check the balance staff tips and the cone cup bearings for wear. This kind of staffs wear and need resharpening to restore the normal function of the balance.
    • Glue a nut to the barrel lid, insert a bolt, pull, disolve the glue.  Maybe someone will have a better answer. 
    • The stress is the force (on the spring) x distance. The maximum stress is at the bottom, and decreases up the arm. That's why they always break at the bottom. I used a round file, then something like 2000 grit to finish. I gave the rest of the arm a quick polish - no need for a perfect finish. Just make sure there are no 'notches' left from cutting/filing. The notches act like the perforations in your toilet paper 🤣
    • It's probably a cardinal rule for watch repair to never get distracted while at the bench. Yesterday, after finishing a tricky mainspring winding/barrel insertion (I didn't have a winder and arbor that fit very well) I mentally shifted down a gear once that hurdle was passed. There were other things going on in the room as I put the barrel and cover into the barrel closer and pressed to get that satisfying snap. But when I took it out I realized I never placed the arbor.  When opening a barrel, we are relying on the arbor to transfer a concentrically-distributed force right where it is needed at the internal center of the lid. However, when that isn't present it's difficult to apply pressure or get leverage considering the recessed position of the lid, the small holes in the barrel and the presence of the mainspring coils. It was a beat-up practice movement so I didn't take a lot of time to think it over and I pushed it out using a short right-angle dental probe placed in from the bottom, but that did leave a bit of a scratch and crease in the thin lid. I had also thought about pulling it using a course-threaded screw with a minor thread diameter smaller than the lid hole and a major diameter larger, but that may have done some damage as well.  Thinking about how this might have been handled had it been a more valuable movement, is there a method using watchmaking or other tools that should extract the lid with the least damage? 
×
×
  • Create New...