Jump to content

Increasing stem height


Recommended Posts

I'm attempting to place a 11.5''' movement into a 11.5''' case, but the case is intended for an as2066 I believe (stem height 2.86mm!) and I've got a eta2772 (2.0mm). Maybe not the best matchup, but we learn as we go. It's a funky case and an available movement. What can be done?

I think a mismatch of .1 or .2 can be fudged, depending on the movement/case. If I had a tall hour wheel and hand clearance on the dial I could maybe raise the dial above the movement by .1 or .2mm by locking in the feet all the way. .85mm is some serious elevation.

A shim ring of brass between the case dial-flange and the dial  would be ideal I think, although I don't have the tools to make one. Are items like this available to purchase?

My current best idea is to find a piece of plastic around .8mm thick and cut myself a ring shim, although for a nice job I'd need a cutting protractor effective for small radiuses, and I'd be pleased to hear of a recommendation.

Is this all incredibly uncouth? Are there preferred techniques?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Furthering the plastic shim ring idea, I'm thinking (besides that this is all a silly idea) that I might get by with a hard red gasket or a hard white crystal i-ring, which I can get in the required thickness of .8 or .9mm (respectively) at the required OD, with the red gasket having a smaller ID thus creating more of a flange for the dial.

I don't really have any exposure to the hard red gaskets, so I'm hoping they are as hard as I think they are and will do the job until I can find a more suitable case for the movement (or vice versa)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been pondering exactly the same problem for a couple of days but luckily my problem has gone away.

The best solution I could come up with is solid wire. It is available in all colours and in 0.8 mm thickness on a 3m roll and only a couple of pounds. It's springy enough to make a ring to space the dial away from the case and set your stem in the right place.

Search ebay for jewellers cord or wire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both great suggestions! I might try the wire trick, I have lots of different wire thicknesses on hand from electric guitar strings that might work. The dial flange on this case is very narrow though, so the round wire might not sit on the flange and give enough height.

@AndyHull I don't know why I didn't think 3d printer! I've been dropping in on 3d printing discussions in other threads, I think in my own mind dismissing them as not suitable for watches, but this would be a perfect application.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I’ve used date spacer rings with no-date movements. Also shim washers should be available in any thickness and diameter. I saw some at McMaster-Carr that are a stack and you peel layers off to get an exact height. Not sure if those come small enough but dial dots and shims should do it. 
 

I also did one where I “split the difference”. Date movement so excessive spacing causes the “sunken date” syndrome. I set the dial flat on a thin date spacer and secured the clamp opposite the stem well; but got creative with clamps on the stem side to have the movement sit at a slight angle so the stem operated properly but it was secure in the case. (And the date looked normal). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve used date spacer rings with no-date movements. Also shim washers should be available in any thickness and diameter. I saw some at McMaster-Carr that are a stack and you peel layers off to get an exact height. Not sure if those come small enough but dial dots and shims should do it. 
 
I also did one where I “split the difference”. Date movement so excessive spacing causes the “sunken date” syndrome. I set the dial flat on a thin date spacer and secured the clamp opposite the stem well; but got creative with clamps on the stem side to have the movement sit at a slight angle so the stem operated properly but it was secure in the case. (And the date looked normal). 

.08 is too high for shimming plus it messes with the height of the hands


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait- .08mm? That’s .003 inch. Nothing! A sheet of paper!

Did you mean .8mm? That’s .031” and more significant. 
 

I think you will be surprised with what will work. But another movement, better aligned with the case may be the right answer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait- .08mm? That’s .003 inch. Nothing! A sheet of paper!
Did you mean .8mm? That’s .031” and more significant. 
 
I think you will be surprised with what will work. But another movement, better aligned with the case may be the right answer. 

.8 not .08


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have some vintage stainless steel cases that originaly housed automatic eta movements, will dig in my bag of tricks for one specific to 2772, hopefuly will find one and I'll be happy to send it to you, meanwhile you can check ebay for vintage west end watches and rumanel, fortis ..to see if you like the looks of the cases, west ends  come with a dust cover too.

Regards Joe

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

oh @AndyHull, reading your 2018 posts about £4.04 I'm not sure if I'm demoralized or reinspired. It's been about a year since I've even seen a mechanical watch for sale in thrift stores here, and I think they were selling the questionable watch for $50. It's been slim pickings lately, I keep going but either nothing's coming in, or there's way more people picking them up before I get there. Still have lots to work on fortunately, but missing that rush of a hit. . .

 

I think @Tudor might be right, I've started looking for a movement more suitable to the case, but will try the spacer ring anyway. I'd like to see your cases @Nucejoe, I hope I'm not as picky as I probably am, looking for something I'm going to wear for a bit :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes I have that in my watch list a JUF if cheap enough I will have a go , if nothing else it will be good for spares
    • Less give a damn- more **BLEEP** it! …nice that it is keeping time I’ve done a couple of these (one with your assistance) and there’s a third that needs work on the tension between what drives the hands and the barrel. Did you have any issue with that? …and I saw Ranfft make a small comment in a thread re: pin pallets- a couple drops of Tillwich blu, let it run down the pins. It is good for 20 degrees of amplitude… I’m using this oil as a cheat code on my unmotivated Venus chrono…
    • This is a very sad day for the industry.. For most of us being amateurs the cost of replacing parts for ETA,s etc will be beyond affordability for the customers.   see full statement below   We have now received the decision from Judge Michael Green on whether or not the High Court has jurisdiction to hear our claim against Swatch, and sadly it is not the decision we had hoped for.   As we have pointed out in previous news items (see below),the rules that Judge Green had to apply strictly prevented him from examining in any way how the Swiss Court arrived at its verdict, even if it is blatantly obvious that the verdict is wrong.   As Swatch’s lawyer was summing up in the last few minutes oft he hearing, the Judge twice pinned him asking if it was alright if, as a result of the Swiss verdict, consumers had to pay 50% more for their watch repairs. After some stumbling, their lawyer’s reply was “Yes”, so  I am quite sure that Judge Green left his court fully aware that the Swiss verdict does not reflect the norms of British Competition Law. However, the rules simply do not allow him to take that simple fact into account.   Judge Green noted that our two arguments relating firstly to British Competition Law now being different from that of the EU, and secondly to the contention that the legality of the Authorised Service Networks has not been tested, had both been mentioned in the Swiss verdict. Because they had been mentioned, he felt that to allow us to argue them again would constitute re examining the Swiss case, and could not be allowed.   As to our claim that we were denied our right to be heard because our evidence was not considered, our lawyers had argued that the evidence we provided could not have been looked at because had the Swiss Court done so, it could not have reached the conclusion that it did. In his verdict, Judge Green highlighted general statements in the Swiss verdict that evidence had been looked at, and acknowledged the arguments we made to him, but again he considered that this was re-examining the Swiss verdict, and could not be permitted.   Our case has attracted considerable interest within the Legal community, and within minutes of the decision being made public we were approached for comment by one of the largest subscription news services, Global Competition Review. They asked us two very pertinent questions, and I reproduce them for you below along with our responses, as they neatly summarise the consequences arising from our case.   What are the key takeaways?   Enormous damage has been done to the fundamentals of UK and European Competition Law by the Swiss courts. It has always been the case that the effect on consumers and competition has to be considered in any decision making, but we now have a ruling that states even monopolists can remove wholesale markets from the supply chain without any consumer benefit based justification. Those entities looking to subvert Competition Law and exploit consumers for their own benefit will be looking at this very carefully.   Has the court made the wrong decision? If so, will you appeal?   The issue lies not with the High Court, but rather with cross border jurisdiction treaties that have no requirement in them for foreign jurisdictions applying UK law to take account of the Ratio Legis [a legal term for the fundamental reasoning why the law was written] of that law, and have no remedy within them for UK Courts to overcome decisions that clearly do not.    After eight years of work, and a very considerable sum in legal costs, I can not begin to tell you how disappointed I am at this outcome. For the time being, there is no further route through the British Courts that Cousins can follow. However, I promised that we would fight to the end, and that promise stands.   The UK is no longer part of the Lugano Convention, whose rules Judge Green has applied, and as yet nothing permanent has replaced it. The political tide turned against repair prevention by restricting supply of spare parts some time ago, and our efforts on behalf of the Watch Repair industry have resulted in high level contacts within several Government Departments. You can be sure that we will keep working to overcome this unjust situation that we now all find ourselves in.    I will keep you advised.   Kind regards   Anthony
    • Dell fancy a challenge🤣   https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/285785684626?itmmeta=01HT29WVJY21Q94C73GYHGBTFX&hash=item428a277a92:g:15YAAOSwNRVmBAUz&itmprp=enc%3AAQAJAAAA0DIe4QLQBW66rSyIMiyBuk8GY%2B86pQ%2BQnxGbcNq7egAGe5DIs9YMmiWJIbZtMSxwNJIiJxuojbq523IeUSBQ6pJEIQ0tfz2ChrBR03BksmKINyklg1IK4GAfAcYY9Hta9wVeSZSZN7ZCNAfZTgKs9c4%2BUIUZ3Qjc3QjUXDn2uPRo1FiYOEewMG5A26EXb%2BclBgrqtbOmM6P3bea%2F8ZImOAXNI1HtbmtMk84pIGoM6ISwaM1PKFuADtTFMccS5e3ZjndCbXYXHrW3CecsV0edw3M%3D|tkp%3ABk9SR8q588nQYw Darwin’s theory of evolution has not been proven to be absolutely.  😀 
    • A already know the size movement I have the problem is the dial a had purchased has a dimension 20.6mm wide a want to find a watch case that going to fit the dial perfectly 
×
×
  • Create New...