Jump to content

Task Lamps - Are more lumens better? (Neatfi Elite HD XL vs Neatfi XL vs Esslinger Professional LED Bench Lamp)


caseten

Recommended Posts

Recently I purchased the Neatfi Elite HD XL Task Lamp 1100 Lumens 6000-7000K Dimming for $90 on Amazon (had a $5 off coupon).  

The other option I considered  was the Professional LED Bench Lamp with Dimmer Switch from Esslinger for $119 + shipping, which is also 1100 Lumens and dimming, but has no information on the color of the light, but mentions "84 white LED bulbs provide ample daylight illumination" so basically, I think it's the same lamp as the  Neatfi Elite HD XL Task Lamp.

Another option I considered was the Neatfi XL 2,200 Lumens LED Task Lamp 117 LED 4 Level Brightness, with a color temperature of 5600K-6000K and a CRI of 80. It was a $5 more than teh Elite HD XL model.

So my question is which would you get?

Is 1100 Lumens enough, or would you have got the 2200 Lumen model? 

Does the color temperature and CRI matter to you?

Should I have considered a different task lamp?

Let me know your thoughts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't say one way or the other, but $5 for double the output AND the ability to dial it back if you needed to... It's better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it. From my own experience with whatever lumens I have available to me, I'd definitely prefer more light.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, spectre6000 said:

I can't say one way or the other, but $5 for double the output AND the ability to dial it back if you needed to... It's better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it. From my own experience with whatever lumens I have available to me, I'd definitely prefer more light.

I hear you. As we age, our eyes become less sensitive and a brighter light source is preferable. Also, the ability of our eyes to focus diminishes. A bright light makes our pupils close down, like when selecting a smaller aperture on a camera, the depth of field improves.

But 2 things worry me. Many dimmers for LED lights use pulse width modulation rather than a current controller. This means that the light actually flickers at a very high frequency that is not perceptible to our eyes, but will still cause eye fatigue. You can notice this sometimes when you see horizontal lines when using a digital camera.

My other concern is, as a dentist, I've noticed that my light cured dental materials can start setting when I'm still working with it if my LED headlight is set too bright. Light cure dental materials are set by blue light in the range of 400 to 500 nm wavelengths. So, that means that white LEDs are putting out enough blue light to set our dental materials. Does that damage our eyes...? I honestly don't know.:phew:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Debating this myself re suitable lamp.  Experience of LED lights is that if individual bulbs then can stand a few failing but often all go at once due to circuit failure), if full strip type then usually a total fail.  Cost of new 'bulb' for LED £45 (ie new light!!), (ref Cousins catalogue).  Fluorescent light, maybe not as bright (double tubes better) but cost of new tube £7!  I also see the lines on my digital camera with LED.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I looked at it like this, I've built a lot of stuff in my time, building structures and furniture,those are my creations and they will still be here way way after I'm gone. Traditional watchmakers felt the need to pass their knowledge on, ideas that they created . I assume with them as it is with me, leaving their mark on the earth, a way of being remembered. This creation of Mark's has brought thousands of people together to pass their knowledge around,  ideas that will continue to be used for lifetimes. Ideas that should continue to be procured. If for whatever reason the forum ceased to exist, not quite like Ranfft's, that didn't disappear but much less usable. Then that is sad, such a massive loss of communication between good people and a wealth of knowledge lost. There should be something in place for when that happens which could be next week, next year or in 10 years. Might not be a topical subject for a lot of folk or boardering on controversy, i did say i talk about stuff other people dont. But if you dont talk about it and something happens then you've lost it and you ain't gonna fix it .
    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
×
×
  • Create New...