Jump to content

Hampden vintage pallet fork


Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

There is a possibility that its to do with the balance and poise of the pallet, as well as being decorative.

Poise is correct :)
We can find many similar shaped pallets from that era, also called "moustache" pallet.

But soon they found that the so increased inertia is much worse than some imbalance and these moustaches disappeared.

Frank

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Praezis.  That had me a bit stumped.  I have an 1888 Hampden, size 6s, and I was really sure I would have noticed a crescent-shaped projection like that on the lever.  But I got to second guessing and was ready to go peek.  This is what I love about this forum: odds are pretty good that someone on here knows something obscure that I don't, and which I may take forever to find on the internet. So, "Mustache" levers sound like they were a bit of a flash-in-the-pan as it were.

Edited by KarlvonKoln
Typo
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, praezis said:

Poise is correct :)
We can find many similar shaped pallets from that era, also called "moustache" pallet.

But soon they found that the so increased inertia is much worse than some imbalance and these moustaches disappeared.

Frank

moustache pallet. huh. I like that! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, KarlvonKoln said:

Thank you Praezis.  That had me a bit stumped.  I have an 1888 Hampden, size 6s, and I was really sure I would have noticed a crescent-shaped projection like that on the lever.  But I got to second guessing and was ready to go peek.  This is what I love about this forum: odds are pretty good that someone on here knows something obscure that I don't, and which I may take forever to find on the internet. So, "Mustache" levers sound like they were a bit of a flash-in-the-pan as it were.

first one I've ever seen in my short time doing this. only other one was in a book somewhere and I'm still searching for it. it is pretty cool though but I can tell you, it makes for an adventure in re-assembly and timing. it bumps into and catches EVERYTHING! 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, KarlvonKoln said:

I just checked my own Hampden and, I was right, no mustache lever.  I'm rather glad it doesn't have one now.

As poise goes, I think I like the counterbalanced pseudo-English lever that my old Longines uses.

agreed!

 

9 minutes ago, KarlvonKoln said:

I just checked my own Hampden and, I was right, no mustache lever.  I'm rather glad it doesn't have one now.

As poise goes, I think I like the counterbalanced pseudo-English lever that my old Longines uses.

the one with the moustache was a 16s BTW

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Bumping this post because I am going to add a picture in a while.  While I'd never seen a "moustache lever" before, I just KNEW I'd worked on some form of movement a few years back that had a counterpoised pallet fork before. So this post was in the back of my mind.
Boy does my memory suck sometimes; the watch with the counterpoised pallet fork is my own old Elgin.  It just has a basic, round counterweight projecting out over the forks.  Not cut like a crescent as in the Hampden.  But I do recall it took a bit of finagling to get it back in place after cleaning.  I was poking about online and saw a lot of different varieties of counterpoised pallet forks, some even with decorative crossed hammers or crossed spears.

(That's a tough thing to get a good photograph of; I didn't want to pull it out if I didn't have to though, since it's tricky going in as well as out.  If you know what to look for, you'll see the little dark disc-like projection.)

20201127_103504.jpg

Edited by KarlvonKoln
Edited to add photo.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

yep I see it. don't dare pull anything apart for the sake of a picture! I'm just now putting the Hampden all back together, as it had been quite some time finding parts, postal delays, people quarantining, etc etc and now I've run into balance staff problems(see latest post).

funny thing-putting in the moustache seemed to be easier this time around and I didn't get it caught on the rug, curtains or kitchen sink once.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MechanicMike said:

yep I see it. don't dare pull anything apart for the sake of a picture! I'm just now putting the Hampden all back together, as it had been quite some time finding parts, postal delays, people quarantining, etc etc and now I've run into balance staff problems(see latest post).

funny thing-putting in the moustache seemed to be easier this time around and I didn't get it caught on the rug, curtains or kitchen sink once.  

Yeah, I saw the post about the balance staff behaving like it's too short.  On the surface, it does sound like cutting a new staff is in the future.  Rotten turn of luck there.  I do wish you luck on that balance; here's hoping it turns out perfect.
And I have to say, without the prongs of a "moustache" to snag on things, a round counterpoise is probably easier to deal with.  But even still, it's just *one more thing* to bump against other parts on the way back in.  And I was tired.  And the Elgin is running well, so I didn't want to start from scratch with that.  But I have to say, there is something indescribably *different* about the  sound of the Elgin's  ticking, compared to all my other old pocket watches.  It sounds more...definite somehow.  Just different.  You'd have to hear it.  It's hard to put your finger on.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks, This watch was in a box of old scrape units that a friend gave me. They used to be his late father's who was a watchmaker before the war and then continued later in life. I picked this one out as it looked like it had potential, and I liked the dial, it's been a bit of a learning curve for a beginner but I was determined to get it going. Now I'm on the final lap it feels good. I'm just wondering whether to invest in a decent set of hand placement tools or stick with the cheap Chinese red thing I have, decisions decision 😆
    • An update, for everyone who contributed advice, and for those who come after with a similar problem. Based on the answers received, I decided to work on the face of the hammer first. I used a square degussit stone to guarantee a vertical surface to work against, and ground the face back until it was square across 90% of the depth. I was conscious of the risk of removing too much material.* After I'd got the shape how I wanted it, I polished the surface with lapping film. To cut a long story short, it did the trick and the hammer hasn't slipped off the cam since. Of course, that wasn't the end of my problems. Have a look at this video and tell me what you think is wrong. https://youtu.be/sgAUMIPaw98 The first four attempts show (0 to 34 sec.) the chrono seconds hand jumping forwards, the next two attempts (35 to 47 sec.) seem "normal", then on the seventh attempt (48 to 54 sec.) the seconds hand jumps to 5 sec. and the minute counter jumps to 1. The rest of the video just shows repeats of these three variants. I solved it by rotating the minute counter finger on the chronograph (seconds) runner relative to the cam.  I'd be interested to hear your opinions on that. It seemed to be the right thing to do, but maybe I've introduced another problem I'm not aware of. * What is the correct relationship between the two hammers and cams, by the way? Should both hammers strike the cams exactly at the same time, or is it correct for the minute counter hammer to be a bit behind the seconds hammer? In this picture, I removed the adjusting screw at 1, and the hammers are contacting the cams simultaneously at 3 and 4. I had to turn the screw down tight to achieve this condition after stoning the seconds hammer and replacing the bridge.
    • It was easy enough to pop off. Once I had the cannon pinion hanging on the blades of the stump, I got my #2 tweezers on the gear attached to the staff and levered it down. That way none of the force was on the brass wheel itself.   I reinstalled it and the bridge, and it looks like a small but reasonable amount of end shake. It also spins easily with a blower. It stops quickly, but I think that's due to the large shoulder and about what I'd expect from this wheel.  
    • Oh, right. For some reason I was picturing a monocoque case in my head. Good looking watch!
    • Well said Ross. My reason for the thread, i like many of us dont want to lose the forum, such a well knitted group of individuals i feel. But things can happen out of anyone's control. Would be nice to have something in place just in case, if anyone has any ideas please speak up. 
×
×
  • Create New...