Jump to content

Advice on number of pinion leaves

margolisd
 Share

Recommended Posts

margolisd WRT Addict

margolisd

Posted
Posted

Hi guys. I’m trying to think this through. I’m restoring a vintage IWC. It has a tiny power gauge works which is hard to describe, but, long story short, two tiny identically sized pinions have broken against each other. Replacements aren’t available. I don’t have the right tools to cut pinions yet. But in my scrap I’ve found a couple I can use that are the exact same diameter. Only difference, they have 10 leaves rather than 12 as the originals have. Is there going to be any disadvantage to swapping them out to 10 leaf pinions if the diameters are the same and they mesh okay? What dictates the decision to make a pinion a certain number of leaves? Is it just the size of the pinion and the ease of cutting them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nickelsilver Distinguished Member

nickelsilver

Posted
Posted

A 10 leaf pinion the same diameter as a 12 leaf pinion means they are different modules. The 12 is a smaller module.

You're saying the two 12 leaf pinions were meshing with each other? That's odd, was this part of the differential? It would be lucky if two 12 leaf pinions had the same center distance as 10 leaf even if they are the same diameter, it could be though, or close enough to still work. The 12 leaf pinions would be weaker than 10 leaf for the same diameter.

If either or both pinions are mounted to a wheel as well no way it will work, as the gear ratio will be changed. If they are just transmitting motion from another gear, through each other, to another gear, the ratio won't change.

A pic or two or three would help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
margolisd WRT Addict

margolisd

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

Thanks. This is probably the clearest thing to show what’s happening. I have marked both points where there are broken teeth. Both wheels are 1.39 with 12 leaves. And I propose replacing with wheels 1.39 with 10 teeth.

Just to clarify, on the right, I’m pointing at the wheel underneath that is a bit hidden in this picture.

 

FD971401-272F-4395-9612-856011CB75CB.jpeg

Edited by margolisd
Link to comment
Share on other sites
nickelsilver Distinguished Member

nickelsilver

Posted
Posted

Bear in mind though that a pinion is usually designed to mesh with a gear of several to 7,8, or more times its number of teeth. For pinions this small to mesh together the profiles are quite modified from "normal". Even so, this is a low power situation so things are more forgiving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • VWatchie
      What are these Seitz B-Jewels?

      By VWatchie · Posted

      That's very interesting information. I haven't tried to see if my bombé jewel holes have olive holes but I think I should be able to tell on the larger jewels at least. See if I get a chance to have a look later today. This little story was very comforting to read for a "bungler" like myself. That success isn't a given even for a pro. Thanks for sharing!
    • Michael1962
      I'm going to be setting up a decent little workshop here at home.

      By Michael1962 · Posted

      I forgot that I said I would do that. Will take some tomorrow and post them up post haste.
    • nickelsilver
      What are these Seitz B-Jewels?

      By nickelsilver · Posted

      I've seen some really nice early 20th century pieces where all the jewels, including center wheel, were convex. Definitely to reduce friction. It can be quite hard to tell if a jewel has olive holes, especially on small sizes, but that again reduces friction- as well as accommodates small misalignments better. Why they aren't used more often? I imagine it was found that at a certain point in the train the actual advantage became negligible, and the added cost on high production movements is why it's not seen on those, just higher-end pieces.   I did an experiment on a little 5x7"' AS 1012 a few years back. These things run OK sometimes, but often are absolute dogs. And AS made gajillions of them. I had a NOS novelty watch in for a service, ran OK flat, massive drop in amplitude vertical. Made like 3 staffs for it trying different pivot sizes, no change. Tried high quality (not Seitz) convex/olive jewels, no change- the original were flat, but could have been olive hole. Same for the pallet fork, then escape wheel, no change. Probably had 20 hours in the watch, new staff and new hole jewels through the escape wheel, no difference in running. Just a dog of a movement. But if I were making a watch I would use them, just because.
    • Neverenoughwatches
      What are these Seitz B-Jewels?

      By Neverenoughwatches · Posted

      When Nicklesilver mentioned the use of them on non coned pivots on older high end watches closer to the escapement.  That suggested to me  probably fourth wheels and possibly third wheels. The square shoulder rotatating on the much smaller surface area of a dome as opposed to a flat jewel surface. I'm curious as to why they are not used predominantly?
    • VWatchie
      What are these Seitz B-Jewels?

      By VWatchie · Posted

      That's what I thought, but as I said, it makes sense. See if any of our pros will have something to add.
×
×
  • Create New...