Jump to content

Bulova set o matic


Recommended Posts

anybody have any experience with a bulova set o matic setting mechanism? I bought one and the movement is in excellent shape, however, the final pullout of the staff isnt there and i cannot adjust the hands.  Replaced staff? Synched incorrectly?  I found a diagram of assembly online but wanted input from here.

Thanks.  Cheers

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this an AS-2066 you're dealing with.

If the stem (I know you use the term 'staff') isn't moving as it should and allowing you to move to a position to change the hands then clearly there must be a problem with the keyless works in some way. 

A good bet would then to look at, say, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WM5gD6PQm5Y around the 13:30 mark and compare where your keyless works are compromised.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes gentlemen i know its the keyless work that is causing the issue.  Its a 1974 11BSACB. 

There seems to be a replaced part from another movement.  Its the setting lever or the set bridge.  Im unsure.

I ordered the same calibre junker to see if i can find out whats the difference between the two might be.  

I investigated mine for quite a while today.

Set bridge has another bridge attached on the bottom with a series of gears.  This should contact a wheel (2nd wheel) that has a slip fit pinion on it.  This pinion moves the hands.  Its a rather ingenious design but the STEM doesnt want to pull out to a third notch.

As far as i can tell its got an incorrect part.  Like i said above.

20200724_160242.jpg

Edited by Orologi67
misspelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

if you will see from the picture the set bridge has a hole at the 6.30 position.  Thats the cam that should fall diagonally left to interact with the slip fit pinion under that pivot hole you can see just slightly below the hole in the bridge.

The series of cams under the bridge is called the rocking bar.  There is a prong coming off this that interacts with the setting lever.

If i place that prong under the bottom pin on the lever the STEM will not move from winding mode (fully imbedded) which as i see it thats the way its supposed to be positioned.

If i place that prong above the pin the STEM will pull out one time.  This sets day and date.

So im back to square one until the junker arrives such that i can analyze and hopefully steal a part.

Thanks for your help.  In the future i will refer to it as a STEM and always give the calibre

Edited by Orologi67
misspelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok.  The long story.  The setting bridge tension arm/spring with two notches that interacts with the setting lever.  The setting lever's pin is supposed to pass the bottom hump for the 2nd pull out of the stem which sets the time (see above pics).  Even after cleaning and oil the setting lever pin just would not pass that second larger hump which is so much larger than the first that it in fact looks like a stop. 

i ordered, as i said, a 20 buck junker, thinking i had a wrong part on mine.  On the junker the the setting bridge's setting lever spring was snapped off.  My suspiscions were founded.

So i took off the bridge on this bulova and got a fine grade vallorbe file and slightly rounded off the bottom hump.  Then i polished that curve with sandpaper.  Then i washed it.  Reinstalled it. Lubed it.  Put the stem back in and Voilá! It finally pulled out twice and now the hands can be set.

Im a clockrepairman learning to repair watches.  Rule #1 in clock repair is never take away metal from a piece.  But this really is an issue of that hump being designed ever so slightly too large.

Im sure customers were snapping stems and breaking setting springs trying to set the hands on this bulova series.

And i do apologize if my terminology is not to watchmaker specs.

Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • people be honest.... Swatch is evil for the watchmakers and repairers, BUT not everything in watches from Switzerland is from the Swatch-Group. As far as i know, Selitta got sacked by Swatch as a Movement-Assembler for them and they started to produce Movements in their own Name with slight Modifications. As far as i know, they sell Parts to the Market for their Movements. In most cases, if a ETA-Movement fails, it is a valid Option to replace it with a Selitta Movement, which i consider the Solution for this Mess with the Swatch-Group...... I have no Connection to anybody at Selitta, but being a Swiss-Guy, i still like to have Swiss-Made Watches, but not from the Swatch-Group.   ok ? regards, Ernst
    • Just one more greedy act by Swatch. They started a number of years ago here in the US..cutting off supplies to watchmakers that could build complications that many Swatch houses couldn't even touch. Old school masters who had gone through some of the most prestigious houses in the world. Otto Frei has some statements on their page about it. I tell all my customers to avoid new Swiss watches like the plague,..unless they just want an older one in their collection that still has some parts out on the market, or they have really deep pockets and don't mind waiting months and paying through the nose to get it back. Plenty of others to choose from..IE Seiko,..or other non-swiss brands Even a number of Chinese brands are catching up with the Swiss,..and I think that in time, their actions will be their downfall
    • Yes. If that's not what you are experiencing...start looking for something rubbing. A 1st guess is that one of the hands is rubbing against the hole in the center of the dial. Especially if you now have lower amplitude in face up/ face down positions.
    • Once a movement has the dial and hands put back and it is recased, would you expect the assembled watch to have the same amplitude as when the movement is in a movement holder and is without hands and dial? Thanks
    • C07641+ not sure what the "+" is for after the last digit.
×
×
  • Create New...