Jump to content

Timex Electric Won't Run With New Battery


eyebidder

Recommended Posts

My Timex Electric stopped so I put in a new battery #357(LR44) but I can't get it to start up. I pulled out the crown and then set the time but it still won't start. Do these need some sort of 'jump start' electrically?

 

Thanks for any assistance!

 

eyebidder

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try giving it a bit of a rotary shake for want of better description. There is an electrical contact that energises the coil on the balance and if you shake it as described it should rotate the balance wheel and make contact allowing the watch to start............unless the fine contact wire is broken or bent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apart from testing the coil with a meter it,s difficult to determine what the fault is. Normally I would suggest changing the movement but being a Timex that I would have thought not a possibility. I don,t know how easy the Timex is to strip & clean or if it,s possible.

I don,t know what caliber you have but this PDF,s might help 

 

 

 

Timex SB101.pdf

 

 

Timex Electric_Manual.pdf

 

Edited by clockboy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There IS a way to "reboot" a lot of quartz movement watches, though - similar to the old Ctrl-Alt-Del on a PC. (Wouldn't it be great if we had one of those for real life?)

 

On the back of the movement, usually somewhere close to where the battery sits, have a look for a tiny contact labelled 'RC'. If you find it, put one point of your metal tweezers on that, and put the other end on the positive side of the battery, to short them across.

 

That performs a reset of the ECB.

 

I can't remember where I first saw that, but I got an old Timex quartz watch going again (and an old Casio) by doing that.

 

But not all quartz watches have that function, so look carefully.

 

--
Pete, Brisbane
============
 

Edited by DrRock
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Part of the PDF I downloaded on my original post

"To start the watch, depress the crown to the

"running" position: The watch will start running immediately. If not, slight

finger agittion of the watch may be necessary to start the mechanism."

 

 

​So there you go just give it a little wiggle (is that a song??)

No No the wrong song should it be "twist & shout"

Edited by clockboy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

On the subject of Timex electrics, does anyone have a service sheet for the Dynabeat 255? I bought a runner recently but I want to service it before I start wearing it. It's such a pain to set the day and date that if I put it on I want to leave it on and wear it daily until the battery dies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry I didn't mean to offend anyone. The shop that I served my apprenticeship and as an improver at used to stock Timex watches. Customers would come in and ask if we could repair them we always said no because the old windups were always riveted together and you couldn't take them apart. They were of such poor quality I'm surprised they worked at all. Every now and then we would take the old Timex watches and hit them with a hammer and put them in the bin. It was a good way of getting rid of frustration.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know Timex pretty much symbolises the lower end of the market and the mechanicals don't lend themselves to servicing but when all's said and done many more people will have owned and enjoyed a Timex than will have owned a high end watch.

I came to this forum as a complete novice and I remain a complete novice, as I've never serviced a watch in my life. Having said that, I'm a helluva lot more capable of servicing a watch now than I was before I joined simply because of the enthusiasm of all the members on here and their help and encouragement. A group of complete strangers who have become familiar, and even friends, simply by exchanging info and support for the shared passion that is watch collecting and repair.

A watch is a watch is a watch! Rolex, Timex, Artex, Lurex! When a mechanism is ailing, my instinct is to try and fix it. The Bergeon Basher should be an absolute last resort, otherwise what are we?

(I highly recommend the cheap Cotes Du Rhone from Carrefour - it focuses the mind wonderfully!)

'Night all!

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I make no secret of my admiration for Timex mechanicals, not because of their Rolls Royce build quality, nor their "no expense spared" choice of materials, but because of their design.

 

That's right, their remarkably successful design.

 

No, they're not easy to service in the "Swiss tradition", but if they are serviced the way that they were designed to be serviced then they are a cinch. What's more, because they were so cheap in the first place, and because watchmakers, who insisted on trying to fully strip the movement to service it and therefore needed to charge twice the price of a new watch to do so, nobody bothered, and yet they still turn up at car boot sales, 50+ years old and beaten up, and still run (just about), and run properly after a half hours service (the way Timex intended).

 

They were never intended to perform to COSC chronometer levels of accuracy, they were designed as a cheap utilitarian time keeper for the "every day man on the street", requiring the minimum of maintenance to keep going. And they do. The "V-conic" balance staff had no shock protection and yet I've never come across a Timex with a broken balance staff, despite some of them looking like they'd been through a cement mixer. Timex even strapped one of their watches to the prop on an outboard motor and ran it under water for one of their ads with no apparent ill effect.

 

A lot of people deride Timex watches and yet they sold in their millions, and as for achieving their design objectives, they out did many other brands costing 10x as much.

 

As for the Cotes Du Rhône, I have to be careful not to focus the mind too sharply on a school night but may well give it a go at the weekend.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don,t like Timex watches because the ones I have worked on I could not find a way to clean correctly i.e. separate the plates.

They were never made to be serviced but were remarkably reliable watches but when they stopped that was it you just bought another.

I have worked on similar alarm clocks where the plates are riveted together the work round is to wash the whole movement with paraffin dry as best a possible & oil. It works but I don,t like it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you sent a Timex watch back to them they would replace the movement or replace the whole watch. I think they were based in Edinburgh. Even the buttons never screwed onto the stem they were just pushed on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank you so much, Hector and CJ. I appreciate the tech sheet and the video. Gasp, I think I will make the attempt. What's the worst that can happen? I think there may be a new balance complete in my future, though.  I'll update the post and let you know the result. R, Frank  
    • So here is the new base (v 2.1), I made it so that the base will fit over and swallow the stump of the hand pusher tool (or at least my clone of the tool), I also reduced the OD of the bottom skirt a little as it looked/felt a little large, here are a few pictures and the fake .pdf file which you need to convert to .zip once downloaded.   The cut-out seen on the below image on the bottom of the base should swallow the OD (40 mm, +0.1 mm tolerance) of the stump and the height of the stump 9.5mm (measured to 9.1mm, but rounded to 9.5mm) - let me know if this works for your tool.   Note, I think you may need to print supports for the new internal shelf created? Here is the fake .pdf for just the FreeCAD base file and 3mf files Modular Movement Holder.pdf Here is the fake pdf for complete set of the new base and ring FreeCAD/3mf files: Modular Movement Holder base and ring v 2.1.pdf However, I'm wondering how often you could use this feature, adding the dial usually increases the OD of the movement, so you would need a new (larger) adapter ring tuned to the OD of the dial and I wouldn't like to grip the dial in any kind of movement holder if It could be avoided for fear of damaging it. Maybe I'm misunderstanding you?
    • Hi Frank, you have dived headlong into the deep end. Hairspring work has to be the scariest thing a newbie has to tackle. Your hairspring appears to be bent and just putting it back into the regulator would not allow the balance to work properly. It might start oscillating but the performance would not be good. The proper thing to do is to unstud the hairspring, remove the hairspring from the balance, reinstall the hairspring on the stud carrier, reshape the endcurve and centre the collet to the balance jewel hole. This challenge would either make you or break you. Hope that you will be able to fix your watch. Welcome to the world of watchmaking.  Watch this video. It think it'll give you an idea of the task ahead. From your 1st photo, I think you have a etachron type stud. Let me see if I can find a video on how to remove it from the arm.
    • Have read of the Tech Sheet attached on the balance section page 12. It may be bent but until you reposition it back in the regulator pins you'll never know. Cheers CJ 4R35B_4R36A.pdf
    • Aloha All, My Seiko 4R35B movement stopped working today. Upon closer inspection, it looks like the balance spring came out of the regulator pin. This is my first time working on a balance. Any advice on how to get this spring repositioned (back to normal)? I'm pretty sure that while adjusting the beat error on this movement, I must have turned the stud (I didn't even know they turned), and the spring eventually fell out.  Will the spring go back to even spacing when it's back in the pin, or does it look bent? Thanks, Frank  
×
×
  • Create New...