Jump to content

Gruen VeriThin Lift Angle?


dpn

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I'm curious as to whether anyone knows what a common lift angle would be for Gruen VeriThin movements?

I've seen that 36° is typical for American pocket watches, but given that Gruen's movements were manufactured in Biel/Bienne I don't know whether it's reasonable to assume a 36° lift angle.

I've seen several posts on the NAWCC forum explaining how one actually measures/calculates a lift angle, but they're, frankly, beyond my ability to achive.

More generally, how important is it to get an *exact* lift angle when judging the accuracy of a movement on a timegrapher?

Thanks all for indulging this newbie question. I appreciate any insights this forum might have!

Cheers,

Dan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, dpn said:

More generally, how important is it to get an *exact* lift angle when judging the accuracy of a movement on a timegrapher?

Zero importance. As explained many times the entered lift angle only affects the amplitude reading, and nothing else, to the rate of few amplitude degrees for each of lift angle divergence.

Old, paper strip timegraphers did not calculate amplitude at all.

Edited by jdm
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you @jdm! That's a great explanation, and I feel a little foolish asking this question. I can see that the amplitude looks healthy with my eyes, and assuming a 52° lift angle my timegrapher is showing a 250° amplitude.

The movement I'm looking at is, however, running very slow (-3m/day) so I'm looking into giving the watch a CLA.

Cheers,

Dan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dpn said:

I've seen that 36° is typical for American pocket watches, but given that Gruen's movements were manufactured in Biel/Bienne I don't know whether it's reasonable to assume a 36° lift angle.

I would be curious as to what a typical American pocket watch is? I think you'll find the video at the link below interesting it shows a nice simple method how to figure out the lift angle. Of the pocket watches that I've done 36° is a bit on the low side. On my list 38° is the lowest and I guess a six size is not a pocket watch because I have a couple of those that were 62°. I would say on average closer to 45° would be a better average for American pocket watches.

https://youtu.be/-Xgcck692js

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gruens would have a 2 arm balance (with some exceptions maybe). From dead zero the balance arms will switch places at 90 degrees when the are above the pallet fork. 180 degrees is when the look like they are hitting their rest position. Wind the watch until they are there, it's easy to see, then set your machine so it reads 180 degrees. Now wind up fully and you know where you are.

With 3 arm balances it's worth making magic marker marks at 90 degrees each side of the pallet center. Remove them after with pegwood and alcohol (works for permanent marker too).

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/18/2020 at 1:46 PM, JohnR725 said:

I would be curious as to what a typical American pocket watch is?

I saw that 36° figure cited somewhere -- maybe the NAWCC forum? But I have no idea whether that was someone's spitball guess or whether its based on hard data.

Thanks @JohnR725 and @nickelsilver for the info on how to measure the lift angle. For me and this specific watch, this exercise is beyond me. I am thinking about trying this calculation out on one of the NH36 movements I have sitting around, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's a good idea - shrinking down the nut and wrench size from the old casebook trick!
    • I missed this earlier. The dial isn't going into the holder, it should sit proud of it. This is what I am currently using which I print for each different movement.    
    • I didn't think pulling to set position would work harden the spring, in that position it is stressed where the arm starts. By work hardening i meant rapid polishing at that point, a bit like polishing a pivot work hardens as it compresses the steel. I doubt polishing by hand would achieve much in that respect though. Its finished, arm polished up mostly at the join to the bridge's main body. I'm ok with it, the screw holes aren't great as i had to open them up by redrilling and positioning it was difficult, I'm not much use with a loupe, opening up with a file might be a better option for me or i could just use the correct drill size 😅. And the detent is way too deep, i had to guess that with the stem release out of position and sat on top, but i only took one measure and went for it, no slowly slowly catch your monkey 😅. First go I'm happy , well sort of, it works and thats a big thing for me, next one will have a bit more finesse.  Anyone thats interested, after filing, i used a 2000 grade home made diamond  micro file and then 20 micron film, the film is much better than wet and dry, more stable to use and doesn't shed cheap grade grit everywhere , then auto polish on a sponge pad.
    • I'm assuming that every time you set the watch you are work hardening the detent spring, maximum hardening is  where it meets the plate due to maximum deflection.   That's why it snaps there.  The Young's modulus may be the same but after it's reached its maximum yeid strength it breaks.  My mechanic engineering is very rusty, correct me if I'm wrong. 
    • Ah ok yes that makes sense to polish it where the arm starts to form from the body of the bridge, i thought you meant the underneath of all the arm.
×
×
  • Create New...