Jump to content

How to wind or release power when ratchet wheel and click are hidden


Recommended Posts

Hey all!

I have a question today that came up for me when disassembling/reassembling an Elgin 6s pocket watch (pictured below).

On most movements I've seen so far, the ratchet wheel and screw go on top of the barrel and arbor facing up on the train side (back) of the movement. The exposed screw allows you to wind the mainspring and along with releasing the click control release of power.

On this movement the click is in a groove sitting under the barrel complete. The barrel would seem to me to be "face down" compared to other movements. I can't see or get to the click as there is a bridge set on top of the barrel.

Is this just the result of a cheaper or more simplistic type of movement or is there some other way to get around this? 

IMG_20200710_080046.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can always release barrel power through the fork,  Remove balance and cock, fork bridge screw, insert a took pick in spoke of a gear to keep it from turning, lift the fork bridge and lift the fork out.

Normally with the old rocker arm, you need to turn the crown towards winding to relieve torque on the clcik, release the click off of ratchet teeth and let crown free to unwind.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

So the click isn't on the rocker arm side? 

You plan a full disassembly?

Not sure what is meant by "rocker arm?"

I have disassembled and re-assembled this one a couple times. The click spring, click, and ratchet wheel are all seated on the main plate, barrel placed on top of them and then barrel bridge placed on top of that. With that setup, not sure if the click can be manipulated?

In this case, winding is more of an issue for me than releasing power, as I received this movement with no stem. Looks like I will need to find a way to engage the winding pinion without a proper stem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Nucejoe said:

You see the big screw in second picture( dial side) ?  It is holding the rocker arm, rocks to wind position and to set position. You will find three gears mounted on it.

Ah, so no the click is not on the rocker arm side unless I'm missing something. I managed to wind it without a stem by physically holding the rocker arm to engage the ratchet wheel rather than motion works and rotate the winding pinion with a screw driver.

There is a visible spring on the dial side but I believe that may be the setting lever spring? Not sure, but it seems to me like what is missing from my winding/setting mechanism is 1) a stem and 2) a mechanism for switching position between winding and setting.

Next time I will look for a more complete movement.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have the Chicago Watchmaking School set, video or hard copy, you might find your answer on page 5 of chapter 5. There they show an Elgin 18s full-plate watch that has the click accessed through the side of the watch. I'd be looking there. If you think you've found it, give your let-down key a clockwise twist and watch for the movement of the click. A piece of small pegwood might get in there to let it down. If not, use whatever fits. Just make sure you have a good hold on the let-down key before committing. Good luck.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, MrRoundel said:

Elgin 18s full-plate watch that has the click accessed through the side

usually on American pocket watches were the click is not visible there will be a hole on the side near the mainspring barrel. With your bench key in and a little pressure the click will release. then with something inserted into the hole I usually use a screwdriver. You can hold the click out then the bench key slowly rotating your fingers and let the power off.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is a very sad day for the industry.. For most of us being amateurs the cost of replacing parts for ETA,s etc will be beyond affordability for the customers.   see full statement below   We have now received the decision from Judge Michael Green on whether or not the High Court has jurisdiction to hear our claim against Swatch, and sadly it is not the decision we had hoped for.   As we have pointed out in previous news items (see below),the rules that Judge Green had to apply strictly prevented him from examining in any way how the Swiss Court arrived at its verdict, even if it is blatantly obvious that the verdict is wrong.   As Swatch’s lawyer was summing up in the last few minutes oft he hearing, the Judge twice pinned him asking if it was alright if, as a result of the Swiss verdict, consumers had to pay 50% more for their watch repairs. After some stumbling, their lawyer’s reply was “Yes”, so  I am quite sure that Judge Green left his court fully aware that the Swiss verdict does not reflect the norms of British Competition Law. However, the rules simply do not allow him to take that simple fact into account.   Judge Green noted that our two arguments relating firstly to British Competition Law now being different from that of the EU, and secondly to the contention that the legality of the Authorised Service Networks has not been tested, had both been mentioned in the Swiss verdict. Because they had been mentioned, he felt that to allow us to argue them again would constitute re examining the Swiss case, and could not be allowed.   As to our claim that we were denied our right to be heard because our evidence was not considered, our lawyers had argued that the evidence we provided could not have been looked at because had the Swiss Court done so, it could not have reached the conclusion that it did. In his verdict, Judge Green highlighted general statements in the Swiss verdict that evidence had been looked at, and acknowledged the arguments we made to him, but again he considered that this was re-examining the Swiss verdict, and could not be permitted.   Our case has attracted considerable interest within the Legal community, and within minutes of the decision being made public we were approached for comment by one of the largest subscription news services, Global Competition Review. They asked us two very pertinent questions, and I reproduce them for you below along with our responses, as they neatly summarise the consequences arising from our case.   What are the key takeaways?   Enormous damage has been done to the fundamentals of UK and European Competition Law by the Swiss courts. It has always been the case that the effect on consumers and competition has to be considered in any decision making, but we now have a ruling that states even monopolists can remove wholesale markets from the supply chain without any consumer benefit based justification. Those entities looking to subvert Competition Law and exploit consumers for their own benefit will be looking at this very carefully.   Has the court made the wrong decision? If so, will you appeal?   The issue lies not with the High Court, but rather with cross border jurisdiction treaties that have no requirement in them for foreign jurisdictions applying UK law to take account of the Ratio Legis [a legal term for the fundamental reasoning why the law was written] of that law, and have no remedy within them for UK Courts to overcome decisions that clearly do not.    After eight years of work, and a very considerable sum in legal costs, I can not begin to tell you how disappointed I am at this outcome. For the time being, there is no further route through the British Courts that Cousins can follow. However, I promised that we would fight to the end, and that promise stands.   The UK is no longer part of the Lugano Convention, whose rules Judge Green has applied, and as yet nothing permanent has replaced it. The political tide turned against repair prevention by restricting supply of spare parts some time ago, and our efforts on behalf of the Watch Repair industry have resulted in high level contacts within several Government Departments. You can be sure that we will keep working to overcome this unjust situation that we now all find ourselves in.    I will keep you advised.   Kind regards   Anthony
    • Dell fancy a challenge🤣   https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/285785684626?itmmeta=01HT29WVJY21Q94C73GYHGBTFX&hash=item428a277a92:g:15YAAOSwNRVmBAUz&itmprp=enc%3AAQAJAAAA0DIe4QLQBW66rSyIMiyBuk8GY%2B86pQ%2BQnxGbcNq7egAGe5DIs9YMmiWJIbZtMSxwNJIiJxuojbq523IeUSBQ6pJEIQ0tfz2ChrBR03BksmKINyklg1IK4GAfAcYY9Hta9wVeSZSZN7ZCNAfZTgKs9c4%2BUIUZ3Qjc3QjUXDn2uPRo1FiYOEewMG5A26EXb%2BclBgrqtbOmM6P3bea%2F8ZImOAXNI1HtbmtMk84pIGoM6ISwaM1PKFuADtTFMccS5e3ZjndCbXYXHrW3CecsV0edw3M%3D|tkp%3ABk9SR8q588nQYw Darwin’s theory of evolution has not been proven to be absolutely.  😀 
    • A already know the size movement I have the problem is the dial a had purchased has a dimension 20.6mm wide a want to find a watch case that going to fit the dial perfectly 
    • Hi.  I would like to take issue here regarding battery driven , watches, clocks,etc. I will and do repair these clocks in fact I have sever al in my collection as well as the regular mechanical ones. I have one on my mantle piece over 60 years old tha belonged to my wife’s Aunt,  long gone Iam afraid and it has been cleaned etc and never missed a beat and is accurate. Every one has their preduices as regards Electrical /electronic Horology but I regard it as part of the progress time line of the art of Horology and to be treated as such. Like Darwin’s theory of evolution it evolved.  Two cavemen knocking rocks together and a shard broke off , looking at it he worked out if it was stuck on the end of a stick he would have a spear. Likewise his pal seeing what he was up to picked up a piece  and did the same, now that’s evolution. Some clockmaker decided to build a clock that ran with a battery and no spring to wind up and break, progress and both the mechanical and battery driven clocks evolved, the battery ones got better to the point that if it broke you changed the complete unit. Likewise watches did the same but both can be repaired by people who approach Horology with an open mind without preduice.  We all have our likes and dislikes bu I for one would never dismiss any technology because I don’t like it.   The mobile phone is a good example of modern technology at work as is the automotive industry. There buttons and switches in my car I don’t use because to me they are not nesessary but I still drive the car.
    • I haven't gone through all the reading of what it might be or not. The first thing I would do if nothing obvious stands out is replace the mainspring, you have to start at the source of the power. Nine times out of ten that is the problem.  
×
×
  • Create New...