Jump to content

Steel sizes for threading.


Seth

Recommended Posts

Hi there,Can anyone help me with what size I need to turn down a length of steel to put a number 13 thread from a screw plate on??I am rather confused on how this sizing works and would be most grateful if anyone can help me with any information on sizes of steel or brass before threading.Regards, Seth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

face a length?

or turn down a diameter?

two different things. which one? for diameter, look up "thread pitch", "thread pitch major diameter" and "thread pitch minor diameter." or I just totally misunderstood your question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi there the screwplate I have is the one I enclose a photo of I got this in a set with all the taps from Cousins UK.The reason I want to find out the correct size of material is I have to replace a couple of case screws on an old pocket watch that have the heads broken in half and I have managed to get them out.I have tried threading a piece of 1.10 steel with a number 13 on the screwplate but the threadform  seems rather flat so before I go ahead and turn blank screws on my Lorch I want to find out the correct size of material I need to use.The origina broken case screws fit the number 13 screwplate fine and a number 13 tap screws into the watch plate perfectly.Regards Seth.

IMG_20200709_043928123.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To tap a hole for a screw to fit in it, then you use the 'thread pitch minor diam' for the drill diameter.  This will drill a hole the size of the bottom of the threads of the screw.  The tap will then take out the metal between this diam and the top of the thread in form of the thread.  A larger diameter drill will mean the thread depth is not full and so may strip easy if the screw is tightened too much or just be too loose a fit.  A smaller diameter drill will mean the tap is cutting into more metal and if care is not taken will jam the tap and snap it.  Normally most screw threads will have tables that show the tap drill diameter.  The smaller the screw size then the closer the tap needs to match the pitch minor diameter.

For making a screw, then you use the 'thread pitch major diam' for the blank rod/wire diameter.  The rest is similar to above, but too big diam will mean more metal removal and possible breaking of the blank in the die, and too small diam will result in a loose fit and possible stripping when tightened.

There are basically 2 forms of tap/die for each size.  One is tapered to allow easier starting of the tapping stage but will not tap all the way to the bottom of a hole or all the way to a shoulder on a screw.  The second will do this and is normally used after the tapered one.

The secret is to use some oil or grease on the tap/die when working steel and tougher metals.and ensure the tap/die is fully square to the work-piece. If you don't have tapping paste/oil then try and use one with EP (ie motor EP gear oil or Moebius EP 1300 etc,) even engine oil will do as these have additives that work to reduce friction at the cutting edge of the tap/die and only come into effect at those local high temps.  Brass, copper and aluminium can mainly be cut without a lube or just use paraffin oil.

Take it slow and just cut a very small bit at a time, backing off every now and then to clear out any swarf, don't force the tap/die.  When following a tapered tap with an end tap always clear out the swarf so you have a clean start with the next tap.

The pitch is simply the distance between adjacent thread peaks and the form/size based on several industry standards.

 

Edited by canthus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That screwplate appears to be metric. So the sizes listed are the thread size, 20 is 2mm, 13 would be 1.3mm. So you would want to start with 1.3mm as your diameter. But- it might (probably) not cut the thread so much as cut and form the thread by displacing metal. I say that because it looks a little dubious in quality. So try a little smaller and see if you get a good thread form. You can turn a taper from say 1.15 to 1.3, and then thread that, and see where along the taper you get a full thread. Make a note of it for the next time you need to thread that size.

 

The old Martin screwplates had a screwy (haha) numbering system. There were two main designations from Martin, L and B; both seem to have the same thread diameters regarding their numbering, the difference is the pitch of the thread. Martin G plates were for left hand threads. Funnily enough, the "backward" numbering system for watch stems and crowns corresponds to the Martin sizing, I guess it was taken up at a time when Martin screwplates were the primary threading tool for watchmakers. 99% of the time I use industrially made metric taps and dies for threading, but sometimes for an old piece I will use a Martin plate. The threads are a little more rounded on their crests. I find that for a given size I need to turn a little undersize, as mentioned above. With new "real" metric stuff I turn to the nominal diameter.

 

 

StemTap-mm.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, nickelsilver said:

That screwplate appears to be metric. So the sizes listed are the thread size, 20 is 2mm, 13 would be 1.3mm. So you would want to start with 1.3mm as your diameter. But- it might (probably) not cut the thread so much as cut and form the thread by displacing metal. I say that because it looks a little dubious in quality. So try a little smaller and see if you get a good thread form. You can turn a taper from say 1.15 to 1.3, and then thread that, and see where along the taper you get a full thread. Make a note of it for the next time you need to thread that size.

 

The old Martin screwplates had a screwy (haha) numbering system. There were two main designations from Martin, L and B; both seem to have the same thread diameters regarding their numbering, the difference is the pitch of the thread. Martin G plates were for left hand threads. Funnily enough, the "backward" numbering system for watch stems and crowns corresponds to the Martin sizing, I guess it was taken up at a time when Martin screwplates were the primary threading tool for watchmakers. 99% of the time I use industrially made metric taps and dies for threading, but sometimes for an old piece I will use a Martin plate. The threads are a little more rounded on their crests. I find that for a given size I need to turn a little undersize, as mentioned above. With new "real" metric stuff I turn to the nominal diameter.

 

 

StemTap-mm.jpg

Brilliant, many many thanks for your reply and help I will now have an afternoon tinkering with my lathes to see how it works.I have a Lorch lathe with lots of accessories and I have just bought myself a brand new Proxxon lathe as I'm retired and have lots of time (no pun meant) to tinker with old watches.Take care,keep safe and many thanks ,Regards,Seth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate saying this, but that looks like an Indian screw plate and if so, I would consider chucking it in the bin unless you just want to use it for mucking about. The taps they come with are horrendous - they just snap. I’m not sure what thread they are supposed to conform to, but I’d experiment using ISO/metric Swiss stem threads and inserting them into the plate to see if they bind. I do own one of these plate and tap sets. 
 

For sizes down to 1.0mm, the common SE Asian set made from HSS is excellent.

For individual sizes, WIRU Germany sell high quality taps and dies. I used mine the other week to make a shouldered 0.8mm screw for a JLC hack lever.

In terms of rod size for a particular thread, I usually experiment. The WIRU set gives a hole size for the taps which may give you a feeling about the difference in size required. In practice, I find the rod size is very close to the major diameter. I always taper the start of the rod (and cut off later). For tapping holes, a broach to adjust can be a good idea, not only because it gets the diameter just right, but because it creates a slight taper to start.

 

A3BB5DB8-1653-4908-ABE7-0D2EEE9AC6CF.jpeg

Edited by rodabod
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
×
×
  • Create New...