Jump to content

My current project: Jacques pocket watch


Recommended Posts

An old & close friend brought me his father's watch...after some other "repair" person's apprentice got done with it.  It was supposed to only get a cleaning. He insisted on springing for parts and supplies, but largely it's my favor to him. I couldn't charge labor on top of what they put him through.

This shop assistant (I'm guessing) didn't appear to know how dials came off. The base plate seems to be marred from prying. The dial was fractured and divoted where that foot was located. And that foot has the tip broken off, and that foot screw was missing when I received the watch. Hmmm.

It did not get the cleaning they charged him for, I can tell you that. Nor did they polish the case, per request. And I think they tried to patch the dial with UV resin. I believe the movement once had an outer..."case ring" is it called? I may have to obtain or fabricate one, so that the movement is not too loose in there.

I found flakes and grit from shattered "porcelain" face enamel in the setting linkage.  So the movement got a complete strip and clean, fresh silicone grease, and fresh oil. It now runs as smooth as silk. I polished the case also, and even the chain.

Now I just need to fix the dial foot, get a replacement screw, repair the face better than I've ever done (pray for me, 'cause that'll be the hardest part) and likely make a movement/case ring. Still some fun ahead. I may have to add a short vid at the end once it's all back together, looking and functioning as well as it ought. It's basically a late-1880s ebauche, possibly from Schild, that Jacques branded. Stem wind/lever set Swiss straight line lever.  I haven't looked up the case yet. Fantastic for a mass-produced movement. 

 

20200626_204915.jpg

20200626_205144.jpg

20200627_101108.jpg

20200627_101459.jpg

20200627_171552.jpg

20200627_171813.jpg

20200629_144950.jpg

Edited by KarlvonKoln
Edited for clarity
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its a pity the person didn't take it back and told them to put it into the same condition as when they took it to that incompetent person, they should have sued them. Because of the damage  they have inflicted on that watch they have removed any value to it. The movement is called a 5 bar movement and are normally Swiss made. Good luck with what you are willing to do in helping your friend, not an easy task. I look forward to the video if you record one. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, oldhippy said:

Its a pity the person didn't take it back and told them to put it into the same condition as when they took it to that incompetent person, they should have sued them. Because of the damage  they have inflicted on that watch they have removed any value to it. The movement is called a 5 bar movement and are normally Swiss made. Good luck with what you are willing to do in helping your friend, not an easy task. I look forward to the video if you record one. 

"Five bar".  I think I've heard that before; and looking at the movement I get it now.

I think my friend didn't take it back to that shop to undo the damage simply because he no longer trusted them, and wasn't sure they could correct it.  I do not know why (or if) he chose not to sue.  But the other puzzling thing, as my friend related the tale, was that the head jeweler/repairman of the shop handed this watch to his (then) brand new apprentice to service. Why would he do that?  I mean, sure, this is no Patek Phillipe or Vacheron Constantine, but doggone it, man, it's somebody's prized Swiss watch that they're paying *money* to have serviced!  If he didn't care about the watch, he could have at least cared about his own reputation. As I see it, the point of a "repair" shop is for devices to leave in *better* condition than when they went in. Or, if that's not possible, no worse than they went in.

My friend and I go way back.  This watch is deeply important to him. Therefor, it is deeply important to me. Whatever skill I have I will pour into restoring it at full measure.  And I see that's what I should always do.  It seems right.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's terrible.. I believe a similar thing once happened to my grandad's Zenith.. and my grandma's Accutron gained a quartz movement at some point.. eventually I'm hoping to replace the dial / install another Accutron. It's frustrating to see these things happen - good luck in getting this sorted for your friend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I await the arrival of some enamel from Esslinger specific to porcelain watch face repair.  And while I wait, I practice. I have learned that those who restore porcelain dials practice before each one (unless they do lots, and there's no long wait between). To practice on something the exact size and style of the Jacques' face, here is what I did: I made a plain-paper copy at 1200 dpi of the dial.  Used Wite-Out on the "IIII" and a few other numbers and partial-numbers.  Made a several copies of the Wited (?) Out copy on glossy photo paper (since it has about the same gloss as the watch dial).
And now, as the other restorers use, I am getting out my Winsor-Newton 00 brush, my deep black drafting ink, and get back in the swing of this. It's been a couple or more years since the last dial. But (I hope) doing calligraphy and illumination as one of my other hobbies may help with doing this.

20200708_215943.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*whew*!  I finally found a commercial site that still had the Bergeon 1590 dial repair enamel!  Turned out to be Timesavers.  Everyone is out of it right now (except spots on Ebay, where it sells for $17 and change but they also want $14.99 for shipping).  As soon as that gets here, I can get this project going again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well, this old "Jacques" is running like new.  And the case is polished like new.  And if the face doesn't quite look like new, it at least looks loads better than its former fractured self.  I have, altogether done the best that I can do.

But I still can help feeling a pang of disappointment. I wanted that dial to be perfect.  I know it's a tough skill to master, is dial restoration.  I also know I have quite a few years left in me to learn and get better.  But I wanted perfection for my friend.  In glancing at the time, it will look fine.  However, bright light tells the tale of a repair. It also didn't help that the drafting ink I used to repaint the number was blacker than black.  I needed a slightly greyer black. Replacing the dial was not an option, not my friend's desire, for it was the only part labeled "Jacques" and the name was important to him.  I could not find an old spare face from this rarely seen or heard-of brand.

He does not have all too common a watch name.  But it looks better, runs excellently, and polishes up well.  I think he will be pleased even if I am still struggling with my shortcomings as a bit of a novice.

20200722_234714.jpg

20200722_235021.jpg

Edited by KarlvonKoln
Edited because weirdness ensued.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Update: my friend was pleased.  The Jacques runs steadily and keeps good time, and looks bright and shiny again.  He even appreciated that the dial has a numeral IIII again and thinks it looks better than it did (can't argue there).  Calling this job finished.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
×
×
  • Create New...