Jump to content

404 Club


Recommended Posts

RIMG0977.thumb.JPG.3abb40352ce3f2ac9719cac12c4e6501.JPG

The Dirty Time Corp "The Beatles" 404 watch was on the bench last night.

The dial paint was starting to flake away around the edges and half of the red was missing from the seconds hand, so a little cosmetic touch up was required to stabilise the dial and freshen up the hand.

image.thumb.png.7d106e9f9a800272f8b6d83dea54394d.png

Not much else to report. Its a cheap pin lever as expected, and it runs as well as you might imagine following a quick clean and lube, and was still ticking away nicely when I got up this morning.  I presume the dial is a "homage" to the above. As to whether this is a genuine Beatles approved watch, or some blatant cashing in on  Beatlemania, I'm still none the wiser.

image.png.8b5e1ea9fc0d0d2a1644c678235f9829.png

This was what it looked like when it arrived.

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Waggy said:

Nice work on the dial and hands.

Thanks.
I was doing a little digging and found this article about "Dirty Time Company" who's name is stamped on the back of the watch. Sadly it doesn't detail any other watches that "Dirty Time Co" may have produced, so I still don't know whether this is a sanctioned Beatles product, or not. 

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2003-jan-01-me-dougherty1-story.html

 

Quote

Eventually, the phenomenon cooled, but by then Dirty Time Co. had spun off other novelty watches and clocks, including ones featuring Alfred E. Neuman and Ronald McDonald, Jerry Brown and Nixon. The family sold the business in the late 1970s.

My gut feeling is that this is a legit "Dirty Time Co" design, but probably not sanctioned by Apple Records, or the Beatles promotional machine.

Edited by AndyHull
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not exactly sure if this qualifies for the 404 club. I bought this off the bay for US$8.09 (£6.47) with tax and shipping. Knew it was a Winton from pictures of the movement and import code, but all dial lettering long gone. This is filthy and has very worn case. But it is an AS 1287/94 with incabloc shock springs. Not worth the time of day for a professional but for an amateur this seems like a great project. It runs and so we have some numbers to work off of, no complications, and everything is present. The scalloped bezel is kind of cool. It ran for several days, and the mainspring seems intact but now it stops after a few minutes. Anyways here it is...13660526_DSCN52212.thumb.JPG.644aee2f25d15d4d64607a1d4512fff0.JPG1481658404_DSCN52222.thumb.JPG.d44900be55892927c895763296c4fe84.JPG1236052545_DSCN52232.thumb.JPG.3ee1e268567ff78995a8edf0cc34c667.JPG1672226461_20230507_1918042.thumb.jpg.0f0b15f2aebdc9f382004810d5bf969a.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Restored1.thumb.jpg.bd87854bd60d802a753531b52848e338.jpg

The "Montine of Switzerland"  slim GP 17 Jewel dress watch got a few cosmetic touches last night.

The hands were straightened out,  repainted and re-lumed, and the case back was re-finished, and of course the crystal and strap are also new.

Cleaning1.thumb.jpg.92e6c1474f7bca9f00eb49a0fe8eb243.jpg

Ignore the slight grubby marks round edge of the new crystal in these pictures. They are caused by the polish I was using, and I did remove them later.

The new lume is actually surprisingly bright, even with a small amount of pigment added to tone down its overly new looking yellow colour. Much more so than the original tritium pips on the dial, which have pretty much lost their luminosity. 

AsPurchasedCropped1.thumb.jpg.c7843b5cdef85f8d21a2b336709d7917.jpg

This is what I started with.

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another guilty ebay pleasure.

RIMG1001.thumb.JPG.a41e0b8627876eaf1725d4d145f9d42f.JPG

RIMG1002.thumb.JPG.ab10616b64ca1658fe0ca4717e4cc505.JPG

I know what you are all thinking, but for two quid plus shipping (the only bidder) I couldn't resist.
Its like caviar and fish and chips.
Sometimes you just can't resist the lure of those cheap guilty pleasures. 🤫   Don't tell anybody will you?

image.thumb.png.e4648d01528f26953b6392c05c466ae5.png

Picked up straight from the doormat and dragged out of the scruffy looking jiffy bag, with no other protection, this is the performance I get.

It still had the crystal protector on it, so its basically brand new.


I might give it a service and see if I can get it down to 1sec/day, just for the fun of it, but then again if it 'aint broke, why fix it?

EDIT: I couldn't leave well alone, so rather than strip and clean it, I just lubricated it.

image.thumb.png.20fc26e8efb43c780b29e4536af5cd44.png

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

AsPurchased1-l500.jpg.7e864b5f71116faebc42958e97aaa013.jpg

A ladies clear plastic watch that isn't a Swatch.

2079094040_Screenshotat2023-05-1417-33-35.png.a36335b3ec1faaff60042b3e21880e34.png
Furthermore it couldn't really be any more "404 club", since I picked it up for £4.04 including shipping, which is a bit of a rarity.

AsPurchased2-l500.jpg.3f011aebf55f9b665ab3b91aed645fe3.jpg

AsPurchased3-l500.thumb.jpg.f04e912478cb2e3216e8e57003ed10b9.jpg

That mechanism looks strangely familiar, and perhaps not in a good way. I'm not expecting quality, just novelty.

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Waggy said:

Hmmm could be, I just went back through my disassembly pictures and apart from the SU there are no other markings either under the balance or any where else on the movement that I can see.

SU is nearly always on Raketa movements but they made nothing that small. Could try Luch or Chaika they make small ones.  The brass shim is a give away and the marked up left hand thread screw.

23 minutes ago, Waggy said:

Hmmm could be, I just went back through my disassembly pictures and apart from the SU there are no other markings either under the balance or any where else on the movement that I can see.

Chaika make a 1601 calibre but its a single ligne measurement. 

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
10 hours ago, tomh207 said:

Interesting history and family links with Racine, Gallet and Enicar.  Notice that Racine is Enicar reversed.

 

Tom

Right, I think I remember reading that they were cousins (?) but not in business together. I was a little leery working on this one. To date the one movement that has bested me is the Bulova 10AN, which is the same as this Gallet FHF 324. The Bulova I went through two donor movements and I still don't have the original movement working. I gave it a time out and put in a drawer to think about how being mean to me isn't very nice.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The Chaika 1601A bridge styles look more like something from an earlier time. It is also finished relatively well for the 1980s, as a lot of manufacturers by then had started a race to the bottom in terms of finishing and materials as a result of the quartz crisis. If you compare it with a comparable Swiss movement from the same period, you will find they have much less elaborate bridges, and other cost cutting measures. Straight cut bridges with no bevel on the edges are much cheaper and simpler to produce than the curved bridges of the Chaika 1601A. They even went to the trouble of stamping a serial number on the movement. A practice which only the higher end Swiss manufacturers were bothering with by this point. The Chaika 1601A does have a relatively cheap balance though. The 'timing screws' in the balance are for decoration only. Having said all that, the USSR caliber designs were fairly conservative, and produced for relatively long periods. This was partly as a result of the command economy, which tended to lead to relatively little innovation in design, and partly because they weren't chasing after the fickle flights of fashion that arguably drove some of the changes from other manufacturers. Some of the USSR designs were licensed or even "borrowed" from Swiss and French designs.   For example I have a Sekonda pocket watch (which may be the next one on the bench for a clean and service). It has a Chelyabinsk Watch Factory "Molnija" 3602 caliber in it, which was based on a Cortébert movement used in Swiss watches from around 1940. Here is one of the examples from Ranfft. You can see that it is similar to the Chailka with curved bridges. They even had Breguet over coil hairsprings and "Geneva" striping. Some had shock protection, some did not.   The Sekonda is in its original 1980s plastic presentation box, complete with "manufacturers guarantee" (although Sekonda obviously didn't manufacture it). This same Molnija  movement was produced in the Chelyabinsk Watch Factory with little change, except notably in the level of finishing, from around 1947 until the early 2000s when production ceased. For comparison, here is a Swiss ST96 from around the same period as the Chaika and the Molnija. . Smaller jewels, flat and unrefined finishing, and all in all, a little bit lacklustre. .. and a Rolex 600 from around 1922   The Chaika, despite being from the 1980s, to my eye at least, looks a little closer to the Rolex than the ST96  
    • Elaborate on this statement. What sorts of things define calibers from different decades? The only thing I can think of short of the pocket to wrist watch shift around WWI and quartz is shock settings starting... late-40s, early-50s?
    • I'm not sure who "we" is as I'm not a part of how "we" do it. Most of "us" develop their own method(s). Please re-read what has been said;  
    • Nice one Andy- a very ‘blingy’ 404 with all those jewels…
    • It's a matter of preference really. You should keep the #5 aside and just use them for fine hairspring work though; otherwise they will end up damaged and be useless for that. Some like #1, some #2, some #3 for general work. Some use brass or nickel tweezers for general work- this is good as they are less likely to scratch delicate parts, and are much "grippier". On that note, the finer the tweezer, the more likely it will be to want to launch parts.   I have a bunch of nickel tweezers that have been retouched so many times they are like 30% shorter than new. Those become handy for when you need very strong tweezers- just used a pair to unscrew the bond from inside a floating barrel. My general use tweezers the last few years are a couple of pair of #5 that have been sharpened enough times that the ends are now very strong; useless for hairspring work, great for general work. These are Dumont Dumostar, which is a much more tough alloy than the Dumoxel, and less brittle than their carbon steel ones.
×
×
  • Create New...