Jump to content

404 Club


Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, spectre6000 said:

That's the coolest one to pass through here in a while. Possibly ever. The very specific history, to my mind at least, is what really puts it over the top. Nevermind the transformation!

Thanks. It is I an interesting piece. I should probably have taken more pictures of the strip down and cleaning process. There was some "fascinating" gunk inside the thing.

It has a split in the base plate and a small screw to allow relative adjustment between the lever and the escape wheel, presumably to allow the manufacturer to dial in that distance for best performance, thus negating the need for very high precision of either component.

The barrel also drives both the minute and hour hand wheels, and has a built in slip clutch. so it has an interesting stacked construction. All of this makes for a very simple but obviously robust calibre. Robust since it is still capable of ticking away nicely after around a hundred and twenty years. It is some kind of Roskopf design, but I didn't find any obvious makers marks, nor did I find anything matching in ranfft. The nearest is probably something like a Liga 315 which is very similar in external appearance.

As to Mr Walter Pamment, I believe this "Walter Albert Pamment" may well be him -> https://www.geni.com/people/Walter-Pamment/6000000002814674500

In the 1901 census he is listed as Age 22 - Walter Albert Pamment worked in London as a Watchmaker. He resided in 1901 at 10 Galena Road, Hammersmith, London, England, which is a few streets away from Askew Road.

I didn't follow the breadcrumbs any further, but certainly it is nice to see a little of the history of these old time pieces.

 

 

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was following up on the earlier post, and decided to use google maps to see that address.

It turns out the previous search had actually turned up a property at 157 not 137 Askew Road.

Here is the actual  shop at 137 as it appears today.

https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.5023229,-0.2426463,3a,75y,45.82h,96.66t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sAF1QipPgxr7ytJqgR7cwIvRuRqWEbDmKFkMiYChoX9vZ!2e10!3e11!7i13312!8i6656

 

image.thumb.png.384d7be50caa2f4168757976a137e0b6.png

 

As you can see, it is now a fancy Butchers shop called "The Ginger Pig".

10 Galena Road, on the other hand appears to have "suffered" at the hands of the developers. I'm pretty sure it didn't look like this in 1901

https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.4934984,-0.2329808,3a,75y,147.77h,85.07t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sjqynFIvUAXr-9sLSJkiTQw!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DjqynFIvUAXr-9sLSJkiTQw%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D50.937267%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192

 

Edited by AndyHull
Link to comment
Share on other sites

RIMG0076.thumb.JPG.c09ace495c158f04382420eeb5fb4126.JPG

They told me to put my watch back this morning, so I put it back to the early 1960s. 😋

Another 404 club member brought back from the dead. Its BFG 866 was overbanked and in need of a clean. It also needed a crown.

RIMG0074.thumb.JPG.31ba3b320b071c44a83ab40160f9d778.JPG

Surprisingly its lume still works. Its not exactly Lumibrite(tm), but it does work.

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, AndyHull said:

RIMG0076.thumb.JPG.c09ace495c158f04382420eeb5fb4126.JPG

They told me to put my watch back this morning, so I put it back to the early 1960s. 😋

Another 404 club member brought back from the dead. Its BFG 866 was overbanked and in need of a clean. It also needed a crown.

RIMG0074.thumb.JPG.31ba3b320b071c44a83ab40160f9d778.JPG

Surprisingly its lume still works. Its not exactly Lumibrite(tm), but it does work.

Strange coincidence with the shuttle cock space capsule on this dial. Finally revisited my grandfather's watch after almost destroying it a year ago. Nearly complete so had a little research hour on Russian watches and Sekonda created in 1966 a few months before i was born. Made in all of the Russian watch factories.  Interestingly enough the first watch in space was a Sturmanskie, now known as the Sturmanskie Gargarin. I wasn't aware the Swiss had a space program in the 60's, maybe they didnt but played a lot of badminton  🤷‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

It goes around the dial attached to the second hand.  I like it .

It sure does. I presume it is meant to represent the NASA Mercury capsule.

image.png.e60b8ad1a6dcdd508293188562d0cde8.png
.. or maybe project Gemini, in the run up to the race to the moon.

image.thumb.png.64b5239ba249104c1918ca3406601a62.png

Either way it is almost certainly from the early to mid 1960s when the world was hooked on the race into space.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

It goes around the dial attached to the second hand.

A 60 second orbit. That's fast! And what about the orientation? Is that the direction these things fly when they are in orbit? I seem to remember a picture  (PG-Tips tea cards?) of one re-entering the atmosphere with the fat end down and glowing, and it is pointy-end up at the splash-down, isn't it?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Klassiker said:

A 60 second orbit. That's fast! And what about the orientation? Is that the direction these things fly when they are in orbit? I seem to remember a picture  (PG-Tips tea cards?) of one re-entering the atmosphere with the fat end down and glowing, and it is pointy-end up at the splash-down, isn't it?

Haha yes matey. Pointy end first going up, fat heatproof burning up on reentry end first coming back down. 😄

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, AndyHull said:

.. or maybe project Gemini,

I think you're right about Gemini, the Mercury capsule was the same but without all of the stuff on the back end.

So, what is the material of this decoration? It must be pretty thin, the lume shines through it as if it's not even there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, AndyHull said:

It sure does. I presume it is meant to represent the NASA Mercury capsule.

image.png.e60b8ad1a6dcdd508293188562d0cde8.png
.. or maybe project Gemini, in the run up to the race to the moon.

image.thumb.png.64b5239ba249104c1918ca3406601a62.png

Either way it is almost certainly from the early to mid 1960s when the world was hooked on the race into space.

Here is my tresured Apollo 14 command module photo taken 20 years ago at the Nasa Kennedy Space Center. The follow up to the failed Apollo 13 mission. Named the Kity Hawk, i think it was an 11 day mission with 30 odd hours of moon walking. It had barriers around it so no sit in and play astronauts but i managed to sneak a hand pat of something that orbited the moon and brought its crew safely home. Behind it is one the 3 remaining extra Saturn V rockets, over 100 meters in length. Amazing visit and experience just to stand in awe of it. 

20221031_193022.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, AndyHull said:

Apollo 14 the "Moon tree" flight. It arguably included some of the most interesting science done on the moon during the Apollo program.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_14

 

Ah i didnt know that. Seeds taken to the moon and then grown once back one earth. I wonder how they are doin ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AndyHull said:

 

image.thumb.png.3a0499b294739a190f1e20d58011298b.png

Not bad, it seems. -> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_tree

 

Haha cool. I may need to visit and take a small cutting. Coincidentally just about finished my grandfather's Sekonda a Raketa 2609 ha. I wasnt aware that the name Raketa means space rocket in Russian, to honor Gargarin's first man in space flight in 1961. One brave dude. My movement has SU stamped on the train bridge, assuming for Soviet Union,  this isn't on the other 3 2609s i have. Would love to date it if anyone has an idea. The caseback has a serial number. Wondering if the end two numbers are at least the year. 14th December 1975 ?

20221031_223625.jpg

16672574870043779095278238955354.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think you can infer a date from the case back serial numbers on Raketa watches. There are some subtle design changes in the mechanisms over the years, and also the later Russian mechanical watches may say Russia rather than USSR on the dial, putting them post 1991/2.

As I recall there are some of the scanned Raketa catalogues on line (which I can't find right now) and a few USSR era watch sites and forums (some in Russian).

Here for example -> https://www.russian-watches.info/category/raketa-watches/

There is also a site that deals with the modern stuff (post 2010) here -> https://www.raketawatchclub.com/catalogs

Lock your wallet in a drawer before you look at those sites, there are some tempting items there. 😋

Edited by AndyHull
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, AndyHull said:

I don't think you can infer a date from the case back serial numbers on Raketa watches. There are some subtle design changes in the mechanisms over the years, and also the later Russian mechanical watches may say Russia rather than USSR on the dial, putting them post 1991/2.

As I recall there are some of the scanned Raketa catalogues on line (which I can't find right now) and a few USSR era watch sites and forums (some in Russian).

Here for example -> https://www.russian-watches.info/category/raketa-watches/

There is also a site that deals with the modern stuff (post 2010) here -> https://www.raketawatchclub.com/catalogs

Lock your wallet in a drawer before you look at those sites, there are some tempting items there. 😋

Appreciate that Andy, i did think it was a long shot. Its quite important for me to date it as it will establish whether the watch was my grandfather's or my father's. Different emotions and sentiments relate to that fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if these will help as they are Poljot rather than Raketa, but they do give some style clues for the era.
I can't find these two on line any more, but if the original individual who posted them objects to me posting them here, I'll take them down.
So far as I can see this is "fair use" since I'm not profiting from them.

Post some pictures of your watch and we can maybe have a stab at dating it.

1966 Poljot (Mashpriborintorg).pdf 932786006_1971Poljot_ocr.pdf

 

In the course of trying to answer your question, I dug through my Sekondas and my "USSR" junk box and found this guy.

I gave up on it previously because the hairspring looked too mangled to save, but I had a crack at it this evening and it actually turned out to be a lot simpler than I thought, so I now have two of these classic TV faced 2628.H based USSR era beauties. Oddly this model has no case back serial number.

This one is currently running about +/- 6 sec per day, and I had the other one running pretty much to COSC standards a while back. They have a nice big balance, and although they are a little "agricultural" in construction they are pretty robust and can perform surprisingly well if serviced and set up carefully.

RIMG0081.JPG

RIMG0086.JPG

Edited by AndyHull
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/1/2022 at 9:58 PM, AndyHull said:

Not sure if these will help as they are Poljot rather than Raketa, but they do give some style clues for the era.
I can't find these two on line any more, but if the original individual who posted them objects to me posting them here, I'll take them down.
So far as I can see this is "fair use" since I'm not profiting from them.

Post some pictures of your watch and we can maybe have a stab at dating it.

1966 Poljot (Mashpriborintorg).pdf 1.98 MB · 3 downloads 932786006_1971Poljot_ocr.pdf 8.02 MB · 2 downloads

 

In the course of trying to answer your question, I dug through my Sekondas and my "USSR" junk box and found this guy.

I gave up on it previously because the hairspring looked too mangled to save, but I had a crack at it this evening and it actually turned out to be a lot simpler than I thought, so I now have two of these classic TV faced 2628.H based USSR era beauties. Oddly this model has no case back serial number.

This one is currently running about +/- 6 sec per day, and I had the other one running pretty much to COSC standards a while back. They have a nice big balance, and although they are a little "agricultural" in construction they are pretty robust and can perform surprisingly well if serviced and set up carefully.

RIMG0081.JPG

RIMG0086.JPG

Thanks for the help Andy. I realy appreciate it. The watch is a simple round case . Roman numerals on the dial no date , sword hands, i think the dial is enamelled as its pretty tough . A small paint chip shows a thick paint or enamelling.  

20221102_210810.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OK, welcome in the world of alarm clocks... I guess the 4th wheel is dished because it is from another movement. If it was not dishet, then it would not mesh with the pinion of the escape wheel, am I right? The marks of wear on the 4th wheel pinion doesn't corespond to the 3th wheel table position, at list this is what i see on the picts. Calculating the rate is easy - there is a formula - BR = T2 x T3 x T4 x T5 x 2 /(P3 x P4 x P5) where T2 - T5 are the counts of the teeth of the wheels tables, and P3 - P5 are the counts of the pinion leaves. Vibrating the balance is easy - grasp for the hairspring where it should stay in the regulator with tweasers, let the balance hang on the hairspring while the downside staff tip rests on glass surface. Then make the balance oscillate and use timer to measure the time for let say 50 oscillations, or count the oscillations for let say 30 seconds. You must do the free oscillations test to check the balance staff tips and the cone cup bearings for wear. This kind of staffs wear and need resharpening to restore the normal function of the balance.
    • Glue a nut to the barrel lid, insert a bolt, pull, disolve the glue.  Maybe someone will have a better answer. 
    • The stress is the force (on the spring) x distance. The maximum stress is at the bottom, and decreases up the arm. That's why they always break at the bottom. I used a round file, then something like 2000 grit to finish. I gave the rest of the arm a quick polish - no need for a perfect finish. Just make sure there are no 'notches' left from cutting/filing. The notches act like the perforations in your toilet paper 🤣
    • It's probably a cardinal rule for watch repair to never get distracted while at the bench. Yesterday, after finishing a tricky mainspring winding/barrel insertion (I didn't have a winder and arbor that fit very well) I mentally shifted down a gear once that hurdle was passed. There were other things going on in the room as I put the barrel and cover into the barrel closer and pressed to get that satisfying snap. But when I took it out I realized I never placed the arbor.  When opening a barrel, we are relying on the arbor to transfer a concentrically-distributed force right where it is needed at the internal center of the lid. However, when that isn't present it's difficult to apply pressure or get leverage considering the recessed position of the lid, the small holes in the barrel and the presence of the mainspring coils. It was a beat-up practice movement so I didn't take a lot of time to think it over and I pushed it out using a short right-angle dental probe placed in from the bottom, but that did leave a bit of a scratch and crease in the thin lid. I had also thought about pulling it using a course-threaded screw with a minor thread diameter smaller than the lid hole and a major diameter larger, but that may have done some damage as well.  Thinking about how this might have been handled had it been a more valuable movement, is there a method using watchmaking or other tools that should extract the lid with the least damage? 
    • 🤔 what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ? Making a small groove so the lubrication doesn't spread across the component but what if when lubing a little overspills and sits on the epilame .
×
×
  • Create New...