Jump to content

ETA 7001 mainspring problems


Recommended Posts

Hi everyone. Since getting back to work i took on a watch for a service with a manual wind eta 7001 and thought it would be smooth sailing. 

 

Unfortunately ive found the mainsprings suplied for this movement via cousins dont even come close to hooking the arbor as the inner loop is too wide, and are much too brittle to adjust (just failed my second attempt)

Does anyone know where/what i can get a mainspring thats sure to work? 

I see gleeve and co sell a mainspring for an eta 7001 but i suspect its not an original but the the same generic, since the price is almost exacly the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A colleague advised i tried with two pairs of sturdy, short tweezers, so that is what i did, i spent considerable time on it going little by little, but there appeared to be no point at which the spring would change shape before snapping or splitting, i don't believe the ends on this particular spring are annealed. 

2 springs in the bin and no closer to finishing a nearly due repair, not really willing to give it another go, you know. 

I think if i can't find a more promising mainspring to order I'll just have to have to put it back together and send it through to central workshop and apologise for the delay. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you have the original mainspring to measure? The reason I ask is that you've been supplied a 1.00 x .12 x 300 x 9.5 whilst ranfft says you should have a 1.00 x .11 x 260 x 9.0

So is a GR2453 more appropriate than a GR2467 if ranfft is correct?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a guy on daBay selling what he says are "Peseux stems for mechanical watches" that includes one for a Peseux 7001, which I believe is the same as the ETA 7001. If they are indeed Peseux branded NOS springs, you should be in luck. Not cheap, but should work if ETA 7001 = Peseux 7001. The seller is in the USA. Good luck.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Ishima said:

A colleague advised i tried with two pairs of sturdy, short tweezers
 

I'm not going to say they are wrong as I've used sturdy tweezers to make light adjustments before. However, it is not ideal, especially when you need to modify the radius significantly. They will potentially cause acute bends which is more liable to cause fracture. I've been there and done that.

It may have been worth trying to anneal the inner coil further on the second spring. But it's easy to say that now with hindsight.

If you are in the UK then I can have a look through my spring selection in case I have one.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey I hope I can help you. I live in China and there's a considerable amount of spare parts of 7001 taking out from the original movement including the whole barrel assembly and mainspring. Where do you live? I see if the selling can ship to you or not? As for the prize I guess one barrel assembly will be ¥100 that's around $14.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you all very much for your helpful replies. 

 

On 7/2/2020 at 11:35 PM, WatchMaker said:

Do you have the original mainspring to measure? The reason I ask is that you've been supplied a 1.00 x .12 x 300 x 9.5 whilst ranfft says you should have a 1.00 x .11 x 260 x 9.0

So is a GR2453 more appropriate than a GR2467 if ranfft is correct?

I feel silly for not checking ranfft first, not the first time that website has gotten me out of trouble.
do you believe the inner hook would be on a tighter coil?

I might just try anyway. I'll certainly try and check and compare the dimensions of the original. 

 

Edited by Ishima
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dont mean to keep bumping this thread but i just though id report back and let you know i tried the mainspring suggested by WatchMaker and it worked a treat. It was a near thing, but it hooks without adjustment and now the watch is working well.

 

Thank you a great deal.:woohoo-jumping-smiley-emoticon:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok thanks Ross, I will give that a try!😁
    • Welcome my friend. 
    • Been there. Worn that Tshirt.  'ping'. Hands and knees. Nothing. Nada. 20 minutes? Ha! I found it 7 month later. How? Well, after advice from a member, I invested in a £4 UV light torch.  Hands and knees looking for a 'ping' from a Sekonda, found them both within 30 seconds. UV makes the jewel shine. easy peasy. Could have taken longer. Just lucky on the location of the search. Hope this helps.
    • Thanks Dell. I thought about silver soldering. Have never done it but would like to give it a go. Do you think to put flux on the butted joint then run the solder in or to maybe brace it with a piece of scrap spring steel?
    • Never and others. Yes, like you I do spend a fair amount of time reading the contents of this forum. I find it better that any other. Clear, lucid, no Prima Donas, and most of all an easy access without adverts. All thanks to Mark. God bless you mate. You give so much to many of us. What if? No Mark? Hypothetically. A forum. I did run a forum for a few years. Really enjoyed it, but became so engrossed that it did affect my health. I gave to to others to run. Not been back. It was very successful and rivalled a number of large paying sites. No adverts, no others but me. I did ask and listen to members comments and it worked well.    Costs Having a domain name, £10 annually.  Register the site with a forum company, free. Build the site using the forum company guide lines, free. It looked and ran almost the same a Mark's. All the same facilities. The cost was only £5 per month, but counted visits (views). If I recall, it was that price for 5,000 views. Each extra 5,000 views increased the price by £2 per month. Success was my own personal undoing. From £5 per month initially, it rose to £60 a month and looked like increasing. This was 10 years ago. I could not afford that, and asked it anyone would like to take over and someone did. I would assume that this is the price that Mark is funding for us all. His return is our continued comments on the internet about his course, and the fact that many of the big names on YouTube mention him as their Tutor. Those of us who have done, and are still using, his course, benefit. In comparison to other courses, I can't believe how cheap it is, and the value is exceptional. It is the structure that gives the value. Long may Mark reign. Ross  
×
×
  • Create New...