Jump to content

Barrel Help


Recommended Posts

Hello all, this is my first question post.  I did introduce myself in the other section though.  I have been practicing repairing on a lot of old 50s junk watches.  This way I don't feel bad if I break them.  This is the second time I have come across this issue.  After I strip, clean, oil and reassemble these watches, everything works well except the hour and minute hand do not move, or move very little.  The amplitude is fine and the second hand is keeping good time.  I think it might be because of the strange additional gear on the barrel in the picture I have provided.  It is attached to the bottom of the barrel arbor and is friction fit.  The barrel teeth drive the second hand and the balance, and this additional gear then drives motion works.  I think that because it is friction fit, it is slipping too easily and that the friction of the motion works is stronger than the friction of this gear.  Has anyone seen this before?  Should I put some sort of breaking grease on it to make it not turn as easily?  I am guess this is what prevents the pulled out crown from affecting the mainspring.  Any insight would be welcome.

 

DSC_0092 (2).jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please do always provide the caliber. 

The seconds hand moving indicates the movement run is runing, hr and minute hands not moving or move little, points out to loose canon pinion.

Check and tighten the canon pinion.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are a couple more pictures.  Yes these movements don't even have jeweled pallets, just metal spikes, and only one jewel.  I figured they aren't worth restoring, but they seem great to learn on.  Every time I try and look up one of the companies online there is little information and they all say "mass produced swiss movements rebranded."  I will definitely open it back up and give the pinion a try.  I had just not seen that extra gear on the barrel in any of the youtube videos I have described and it seems part of the movement works.  Thanks for taking the time to respond.

DSC_0077.jpg

DSC_0075.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just took the watch apart again and its not the canon pinion.  There is no through pivot on this watch so the canon pinion just sits on static metal, its the weird extra gear that is supposed to drive it.  I put a small mark on it and left it for a while and that gear is not turning at all despite being attached to the barrel.  I think I just need to somehow increase the friction of that gear so that it only slips when setting the time, but not when the watch is ticking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I figured out that it was a Baumgartner 866 movement.  I found a site that said this: "indirect minute, hand friction clutch on barrel (Roskopf type)"

So, I think what i am going to do is peen the inner ring tomorrow so it presses more firmly on the the friction fit gear.  That should increase the friction in the same way tightening a canon pinion would do.  I will post pictures.  Luckily I have a scrap barrel to practice on.  I'm not sure how "tight" a perfect canon pinion feels, but I'm guessing its something like "it turns, but only if you put some work into it."  I am still very new at this hobby.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, one hit with the hammer and pin and the gear turned much more tightly. Once I put it all together it work as expected with the hour and minutes turning properly.  So, for this kind of movement, its the gear on the barrel that needs to be tightened instead of the canon pinion.  The watch is running very fast, but that is a whole different problem.  Thank you to everyone that responded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
×
×
  • Create New...