Jump to content

Lubricating requirements for Longines 291 auto works and crown wheel


Recommended Posts

Afternoon everyone.

I've been working on a Longines 291 Automatic and have stripped, cleaned and rebuilt it to a point where it's running well but only as a manual. 

I've not previously worked on any automatics other than Seikos and their very simple Pawl lever. Can I ask what the general requirements would be for an automatic assembly, I've attached some pictures of the specific unit and specific advise would also be welcome.

In addition I've not seen a 2 piece crown wheel either, can anyone advise the normal requirement for these types of wheels?

Many thanks as always.

 

Screenshot_20200627_141041.jpg

Screenshot_20200627_141030.jpg

Screenshot_20200627_141012.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Fraczish said:

also as it's not be covered in marks courses 1-3. 

Actually is covered in level 3, and there are specific lubricant questions in the test.
You can also use the search box above, lubrication is often debated and you can find very many topics on pretty much any specific area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm also a bit confused about oiling auto systems.  Marks course doesn't cover lubrication of automatic winding mechanisms.  I'm eagerly awaiting part 4...

I'm ordering some V105 specifically for the reversing wheels.  The Moebius oiling chart says to use 9010/9020 or D5 but elsewhere is says use 8141 in "certain parts".

Currently working on 2 autos, an ETA 2452 and a F 1560.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AshF said:

I'm also a bit confused about oiling auto systems. 

Welcome to the confusing subject of lubrication. That is why I suggested that you have a good read on the many topics on the matter, with particular attention to the posting by Master nickelsilver and JohnR275.
What is recommended in one sheet or book is not the same in another. Equally good watchmakers would do things slightly differently. Not even all what our Host Mark Lovick is teaching is carved in stone.
The best approach is that one reads, consider, digest and then chose with an eye to the wallet. Even if a product is canonized it would make little sense for a beginner / hobbyist to spend $500 of lubricant to service few watches a year. But that amount is what apparently manufacturers want one to spend.

Edited by jdm
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I appreciate the response JDM, I've read through many of them personally and completely agree with you that many people have different methods and thoughts.. 

I tried the search function but couldn't see anything that answered what I was asking. I'm sure it's there somewhere of course..

The purpose of this thread was just to get some thoughts about the specific parts I'm struggling with. I'm sure there would be difference in opinions, I could then decide how I feel most comfortable proceeding. 

If none comes forward, that's ok, I'll just wear it as a manual!:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks JDM, this is pretty much what I thought.  I've read plenty of posts on oiling and there is little consensus.  I am just a hobbyist, starting out with good intentions.  I don't want to spend £££ but then I don't want to get into bad habits either.  I'm looking for "general" guidance.  I guess I'll just use 9010 on all the bits except any reversing wheels and hope for the best until someone shouts at me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Fraczish said:

I tried the search function but couldn't see anything that answered what I was asking. I'm sure it's there somewhere of course..

Maybe below and again, many others. In fact the forum search function works only for a single term on phrase in double quotes. For a better intelligence use Google "site search".

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I looked at it like this, I've built a lot of stuff in my time, building structures and furniture,those are my creations and they will still be here way way after I'm gone. Traditional watchmakers felt the need to pass their knowledge on, ideas that they created . I assume with them as it is with me, leaving their mark on the earth, a way of being remembered. This creation of Mark's has brought thousands of people together to pass their knowledge around,  ideas that will continue to be used for lifetimes. Ideas that should continue to be procured. If for whatever reason the forum ceased to exist, not quite like Ranfft's, that didn't disappear but much less usable. Then that is sad, such a massive loss of communication between good people and a wealth of knowledge lost. There should be something in place for when that happens which could be next week, next year or in 10 years. Might not be a topical subject for a lot of folk or boardering on controversy, i did say i talk about stuff other people dont. But if you dont talk about it and something happens then you've lost it and you ain't gonna fix it .
    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
×
×
  • Create New...