Jump to content

Hairsprings and pallet forks


Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone, just looking for some advice on hairsprings and pallet forks. I have been sourcing parts for a Ricoh 61 from a well known UK watch parts supplier, namely pallet fork and hairspring. The parts supplied look to be second hand reclaimed parts and have had issues. Pallet forks with jewels fitted way too long and one where the guard pin was severely bent. Also a hairspring that was twisted and needs manipulation. I wouldn't think this is a normal situation to be expected. What do you all think? Is it normal and expected? Thanks in advance.

 

Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, steve1811uk said:

I have been sourcing parts for a Ricoh 61 from a well known UK watch parts supplier, namely pallet fork and hairspring. The parts supplied look to be second hand reclaimed parts and have had issues. Pallet forks with jewels fitted way too long and one where the guard pin was severely bent. Also a hairspring that was twisted and needs manipulation. I wouldn't think this is a normal situation to be expected. What do you all think? Is it normal and expected? 

Not surprising for parts that have been in storage for decades, and occasionally examined and then put away. Up to you decide if these are better than the ones that you had, and if worth to bring it up to the seller.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • people be honest.... Swatch is evil for the watchmakers and repairers, BUT not everything in watches from Switzerland is from the Swatch-Group. As far as i know, Selitta got sacked by Swatch as a Movement-Assembler for them and they started to produce Movements in their own Name with slight Modifications. As far as i know, they sell Parts to the Market for their Movements. In most cases, if a ETA-Movement fails, it is a valid Option to replace it with a Selitta Movement, which i consider the Solution for this Mess with the Swatch-Group...... I have no Connection to anybody at Selitta, but being a Swiss-Guy, i still like to have Swiss-Made Watches, but not from the Swatch-Group.   ok ? regards, Ernst
    • Just one more greedy act by Swatch. They started a number of years ago here in the US..cutting off supplies to watchmakers that could build complications that many Swatch houses couldn't even touch. Old school masters who had gone through some of the most prestigious houses in the world. Otto Frei has some statements on their page about it. I tell all my customers to avoid new Swiss watches like the plague,..unless they just want an older one in their collection that still has some parts out on the market, or they have really deep pockets and don't mind waiting months and paying through the nose to get it back. Plenty of others to choose from..IE Seiko,..or other non-swiss brands Even a number of Chinese brands are catching up with the Swiss,..and I think that in time, their actions will be their downfall
    • Yes. If that's not what you are experiencing...start looking for something rubbing. A 1st guess is that one of the hands is rubbing against the hole in the center of the dial. Especially if you now have lower amplitude in face up/ face down positions.
    • Once a movement has the dial and hands put back and it is recased, would you expect the assembled watch to have the same amplitude as when the movement is in a movement holder and is without hands and dial? Thanks
    • C07641+ not sure what the "+" is for after the last digit.
×
×
  • Create New...