Jump to content

Clock from a MIG fighter


Recommended Posts

In 1999 a friend came from Russia to stay with me for a week to attend a cell biology conference in my city. As a gift, she brought me a clock out of a MIG fighter. It stopped working and I opened it to see if I could find out what was wrong. I found that the jewel that holds one end of the balance wheel had broken. I had no idea how to find a new jewel for it or if it was even possible. I also didn't want to go taking the whole thing apart for fear of never being able to put it together again. Does anyone have an idea who, in the US, might be able to do this?

Thanks,

Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Evergreen64 said:

In 1999 a friend came from Russia to stay with me for a week to attend a cell biology conference in my city. As a gift, she brought me a clock out of a MIG fighter. It stopped working and I opened it to see if I could find out what was wrong. I found that the jewel that holds one end of the balance wheel had broken. I had no idea how to find a new jewel for it or if it was even possible. I also didn't want to go taking the whole thing apart for fear of never being able to put it together again. Does anyone have an idea who, in the US, might be able to do this?

Thanks,

Mike

Assuming his was a cold war MIG then the clock, if luminous, probably used radio active material to achieve the luminescence, the dust from which is VERY dangerous if inhaled. Great care needs to be used when opening luminous clocks and watches from the1960's and before.............

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Evergreen64 said:

a clock out of a MIG fighter

That's very interesting. I'm very much into Russian wrist watches but have never worked on any Russian clock. I know Vostok makes ship clocks available to anyone interested. Not sure new members can upload pictures but that would be a good and interesting start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it one like the one below? That one is mine. Parts are difficult. You can get a new balance wheel or a set of hands, or a dial, even a nice display stand, easier than any other bits. Is it the jewel in the balance bridge? If so, you may find it easier but not financially feasible to purchase an entire watch and possibly scavenge the balance, though it would be a waste of one watch for another. I put in a question with a seller on eBay who is selling a handful of miscellaneous gears for one of these to see if they have a bridge available, assuming that is the culprit. Mine has an issue with the lower balance jewel Chaton. It had moved away from it's propper position and would cause the balance to overbank randomly. I seem to have it sorted now. They were built in a relatively robust manner, most bits are quite easy to disassemble. I suspect the reason there are so many available is likely because it was easier to replace a faulty watch rather than try to service one. Most were likely sent back to the factory but again, it was just simpler to ship out a new one rather than to bother fixing them. These watches were in military aircraft so they were certainly subject to vibration, impacts, shocks, and wild temperature swings to say the least. I would imagine it wouldn't take long before issues began to arise. The were usually placed low in the instrument panels to make getting at them easier when they failed. 2 thumb screws and two wire connectors were all that were required to remove these. As I said, mine is running reliably now as long as I don't fiddle with it too much while it's running. I would be curious to see photos of yours. I'll let you know if the eBay seller gets back to me.

My AChS-1 watch

20200626_054230.thumb.jpg.baf66e5e395d1184d553e7b2e5d0406b.jpg

There upper balance jewel.

20200626_054816.thumb.jpg.a48d703ce7b42d4228d92c1098ceea04.jpg

Here is a shot of one properly mounted in a Mig-29 Fulcrum.

20200626_062705.thumb.jpg.688c503cfe285692b0afe045803246e3.jpg

 

 

Edited by FLwatchguy73
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

you're in luck, the seller on eBay I messaged has a complete balance arm available. 

quoted message below....

New message from: remwatch (650)

Hello.I have a balance bridge. But I also have jewel for it.

 

HERE is the link to the original listing. Contact the seller and see how much they want for the Bridge.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/26/2020 at 2:05 AM, JohnD said:

Assuming his was a cold war MIG then the clock, if luminous, probably used radio active material to achieve the luminescence, the dust from which is VERY dangerous if inhaled. Great care needs to be used when opening luminous clocks and watches from the1960's and before.............

While is true that Radium is an hazardous tolerance, this routine warning given every-time that an old watch is mentioned is greatly exaggerated. The danger becomes real manly when the substance is ingested, or inhaled, and for prolonged time. Occasional manipulation of watches do not present danger whatsoever. Otherwise all of the old watchmakers and dial / hand manufacturers would be dead or fell sick back in the 60's already, fortunately is not so.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radium#Hazards

 

Edited by jdm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jdm said:

While is true that Radium is an hazardous tolerance, this routine warning given every-time that an old watch is mentioned is greatly exaggerated. The danger becomes real manly when the substance is ingested, or inhaled, and for prolonged time. Occasional manipulation of watches do not present danger whatsoever. Otherwise all of the old watchmakers and dial / hand manufacturers would be dead or fell sick back in the 60's already, fortunately is not so.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radium#Hazards

 

Agree, but with degraded lume flaking off the danger is in breathing in the dust, hence the warning........

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes I have that in my watch list a JUF if cheap enough I will have a go , if nothing else it will be good for spares
    • Less give a damn- more **BLEEP** it! …nice that it is keeping time I’ve done a couple of these (one with your assistance) and there’s a third that needs work on the tension between what drives the hands and the barrel. Did you have any issue with that? …and I saw Ranfft make a small comment in a thread re: pin pallets- a couple drops of Tillwich blu, let it run down the pins. It is good for 20 degrees of amplitude… I’m using this oil as a cheat code on my unmotivated Venus chrono…
    • This is a very sad day for the industry.. For most of us being amateurs the cost of replacing parts for ETA,s etc will be beyond affordability for the customers.   see full statement below   We have now received the decision from Judge Michael Green on whether or not the High Court has jurisdiction to hear our claim against Swatch, and sadly it is not the decision we had hoped for.   As we have pointed out in previous news items (see below),the rules that Judge Green had to apply strictly prevented him from examining in any way how the Swiss Court arrived at its verdict, even if it is blatantly obvious that the verdict is wrong.   As Swatch’s lawyer was summing up in the last few minutes oft he hearing, the Judge twice pinned him asking if it was alright if, as a result of the Swiss verdict, consumers had to pay 50% more for their watch repairs. After some stumbling, their lawyer’s reply was “Yes”, so  I am quite sure that Judge Green left his court fully aware that the Swiss verdict does not reflect the norms of British Competition Law. However, the rules simply do not allow him to take that simple fact into account.   Judge Green noted that our two arguments relating firstly to British Competition Law now being different from that of the EU, and secondly to the contention that the legality of the Authorised Service Networks has not been tested, had both been mentioned in the Swiss verdict. Because they had been mentioned, he felt that to allow us to argue them again would constitute re examining the Swiss case, and could not be allowed.   As to our claim that we were denied our right to be heard because our evidence was not considered, our lawyers had argued that the evidence we provided could not have been looked at because had the Swiss Court done so, it could not have reached the conclusion that it did. In his verdict, Judge Green highlighted general statements in the Swiss verdict that evidence had been looked at, and acknowledged the arguments we made to him, but again he considered that this was re-examining the Swiss verdict, and could not be permitted.   Our case has attracted considerable interest within the Legal community, and within minutes of the decision being made public we were approached for comment by one of the largest subscription news services, Global Competition Review. They asked us two very pertinent questions, and I reproduce them for you below along with our responses, as they neatly summarise the consequences arising from our case.   What are the key takeaways?   Enormous damage has been done to the fundamentals of UK and European Competition Law by the Swiss courts. It has always been the case that the effect on consumers and competition has to be considered in any decision making, but we now have a ruling that states even monopolists can remove wholesale markets from the supply chain without any consumer benefit based justification. Those entities looking to subvert Competition Law and exploit consumers for their own benefit will be looking at this very carefully.   Has the court made the wrong decision? If so, will you appeal?   The issue lies not with the High Court, but rather with cross border jurisdiction treaties that have no requirement in them for foreign jurisdictions applying UK law to take account of the Ratio Legis [a legal term for the fundamental reasoning why the law was written] of that law, and have no remedy within them for UK Courts to overcome decisions that clearly do not.    After eight years of work, and a very considerable sum in legal costs, I can not begin to tell you how disappointed I am at this outcome. For the time being, there is no further route through the British Courts that Cousins can follow. However, I promised that we would fight to the end, and that promise stands.   The UK is no longer part of the Lugano Convention, whose rules Judge Green has applied, and as yet nothing permanent has replaced it. The political tide turned against repair prevention by restricting supply of spare parts some time ago, and our efforts on behalf of the Watch Repair industry have resulted in high level contacts within several Government Departments. You can be sure that we will keep working to overcome this unjust situation that we now all find ourselves in.    I will keep you advised.   Kind regards   Anthony
    • Dell fancy a challenge🤣   https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/285785684626?itmmeta=01HT29WVJY21Q94C73GYHGBTFX&hash=item428a277a92:g:15YAAOSwNRVmBAUz&itmprp=enc%3AAQAJAAAA0DIe4QLQBW66rSyIMiyBuk8GY%2B86pQ%2BQnxGbcNq7egAGe5DIs9YMmiWJIbZtMSxwNJIiJxuojbq523IeUSBQ6pJEIQ0tfz2ChrBR03BksmKINyklg1IK4GAfAcYY9Hta9wVeSZSZN7ZCNAfZTgKs9c4%2BUIUZ3Qjc3QjUXDn2uPRo1FiYOEewMG5A26EXb%2BclBgrqtbOmM6P3bea%2F8ZImOAXNI1HtbmtMk84pIGoM6ISwaM1PKFuADtTFMccS5e3ZjndCbXYXHrW3CecsV0edw3M%3D|tkp%3ABk9SR8q588nQYw Darwin’s theory of evolution has not been proven to be absolutely.  😀 
    • A already know the size movement I have the problem is the dial a had purchased has a dimension 20.6mm wide a want to find a watch case that going to fit the dial perfectly 
×
×
  • Create New...