Jump to content

Piaget bumper???


Recommended Posts

Morning all

 

I was wondering if anybody could shed any light on this movement if possible. The watch dates from around the 40s or 50s and I’m not sure if this is period correct for this watch. I have seen similar looking watches housing an AS1250 movement stamped Piaget but this looks to be different. My inital guess is this has lots of replacement parts but I’m no expert so was wondering if someone could help.

 

Thanks guys

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkAdjustments.jpgAdjustments.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That appears to be an AS 1171 which would fit with the your dating i.e. produced up to about the mid-1940s.

Looking at Ranfft does gives production for the 1171 spanning 1935 to 1945 whilst for the 1250 it's 1940 to 1953. If you've seen similar watches to yours sporting the latter it would indicate yours is an early model that used the earlier movement.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That appears to be an AS 1171 which would fit with the your dating i.e. produced up to about the mid-1940s.
Looking at Ranfft does gives production for the 1171 spanning 1935 to 1945 whilst for the 1250 it's 1940 to 1953. If you've seen similar watches to yours sporting the latter it would indicate yours is an early model that used the earlier movement.
 

That would make sense as I have been told the printing on the dial “fab sussie” would be indication of an earlier model. Thanks for your help it’s much appreciated


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Out of interest what condition is the dial in given the age of the watch? The case, at least from the back, looks to be pretty tidy.
BTW this is a good set of pics relating to a service of an AS 1171 you might be interested in: https://watchguy.co.uk/cgi-bin/library?action=show_photos&wat_id=3006


Yes the case has only a tiny dint on the back of one of the lugs but apart from that it has only light scratches and I also believe that it’s unpolished but I’m not expert. I’ve attached a picture of the dial and would love to hear your opinion on it.

Cheers & thanks for the link to the AS1171 service


Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkAdjustments.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah ... so it's actually an AS 1172 as it has a sweep hand rather than a sub-second hand. Same movement in the main as the 1171 though.

The dial looks amazingly fresh ... the first thing that stands out is that the Piaget Automatic script looks a lot fresher than it has any right to on a 75 year old watch! But it could just be that Piaget used good quality materials and that, based on the good condition overall, this watch has only been used on special occasions and kept in a dry dark place normally that preserved the dial.

Nice watch. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah ... so it's actually an AS 1172 as it has a sweep hand rather than a sub-second hand. Same movement in the main as the 1171 though.
The dial looks amazingly fresh ... the first thing that stands out is that the Piaget Automatic script looks a lot fresher than it has any right to on a 75 year old watch! But it could just be that Piaget used good quality materials and that, based on the good condition overall, this watch has only been used on special occasions and kept in a dry dark place normally that preserved the dial.
Nice watch. [emoji4]

Oh interesting. I have sent some pictures to Piaget to see if they have any information on the watch as I don’t even know the reference number or anything else about it and would love to have a little more information. I have no reason to believe the dial is a forgery but if it was I wouldn’t even know to be totally honest as the brand & age of the watch are out of my expertise, hopefully Piaget can shed some light on this matter....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's nothing to suggest anything about this is a forgery.
You might have already come across this in your research: https://watchcharts.com/listing/599135 Same era, same font around edges etc.

Sure, no I have not come across this during my research so thanks for that. it certainly does display a lot of the same traits doesn’t it. I’m having trouble finding out if similar models also have fixed bars between the lugs as mine does but I’m guessing there would be different variations between the models anyway. aesthetically I find the watch very pleasing but until some of these questions have been answered I don’t think I will be able to fully enjoy the piece as I’m a sucker for knowing the history of my timepieces.

Cheers


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
×
×
  • Create New...