Jump to content

21st jewel a lie?


Recommended Posts

I have a 7S26B and a 7S26C apart on my best right now. Both rotors state clearly "TWENTY-ONE JEWELS". With the two main plates side by side, it's impossible to miss the mainspring barrel arbor hole is jeweled on the C main plate, and not on the B. Logically then, there must be an extra jewel elsewhere in the B... Except... I counted it up a half dozen times, then wrote it down because I was clearly missing something... But I just can't find the 21st jewel on the 7S26B. Given the possibilities of Seiko lying or my swiss cheese brain missing something, money is on my own failings... So... What am I missing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, spectre6000 said:

I have a 7S26B and a 7S26C apart on my best right now. Both rotors state clearly "TWENTY-ONE JEWELS". With the two main plates side by side, it's impossible to miss the mainspring barrel arbor hole is jeweled on the C main plate, and not on the B. Logically then, there must be an extra jewel elsewhere in the B... Except... I counted it up a half dozen times, then wrote it down because I was clearly missing something... But I just can't find the 21st jewel on the 7S26B. Given the possibilities of Seiko lying or my swiss cheese brain missing something, money is on my own failings... So... What am I missing?

No lie. Have you counted the impulse jewel. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jdm said:

Have you counted the impulse jewel.

Isn't the impulse jewel common to both movements?

Since the "C" has a jewelled barrel arbor hole which isn't jewelled on the "B", in order for the jewel count to be correct for both movements the "B" must have a jewelled bearing that is not jewelled on the "C".

It would be interesting to see what aspect of the "C" was improved by removing a jewel, even if it just turns out to be the cost of manufacture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Impulse jewel counted on both.

I've owned both since new. The only differences between the rotors are B and C after 7S26. I googled it a bit, and found others also coming up short, and haven't found an answer.

I can't promise any fancy editing or anything, but I'll see about getting some photos up this evening if I don't break myself too badly with today's activities.

Edited by spectre6000
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 6/7/2020 at 4:47 PM, spectre6000 said:

I googled it a bit, and found others also coming up short, and haven't found an answer.

Winding reduction wheel has 2 holed jewels
Center wheel has 2 holed jewels
3rd and escape have 3 each, 2 holed but only upper side are anti-shock with cap jewels.
Pallet fork have 2, it pivots on 2 more.
Balance has 1, it pivots on (anti-shock) 4 more 
Total 21. 

There are also 23J versions, these have anti-shock for 3rd and escape on small plate.

If you want to know their P/N, check my document

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vRN2UULQKTfKmhRStZhDdIOIQrqd6sPB-g6x2SKyQQjOvTBjG_7TQXQhAT4f1WqAX5QAPkIimi-3jqd/pubhtml


 

Edited by jdm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

7 hours ago, jdm said:

2 = Winding reduction wheel has 2 holed jewels
2 = Center wheel has 2 holed jewels
6 = 3rd and escape have 3 each, 2 holed but only upper side are anti-shock with cap jewels.
4 = Pallet fork have 2, it pivots on 2 more.
5 = Balance has 1, it pivots on (anti-shock) 4 more 
Total 21. 19 (I think you counted the "2" in your explanation of the 3rd/escape having cap jewels to get to 21)

I don't have it apart in front of me, but I think the one you're missing is the seconds wheel, which goes through the center wheel, has a jewel on the same axis as the rotor/center wheel on the underside of the threaded post for the rotor. Then the 7S26C adds the jeweled barrel arbor for 21.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/7/2020 at 10:50 AM, Marc said:

It would be interesting to see what aspect of the "C" was improved by removing a jewel, even if it just turns out to be the cost of manufacture.

Answer below.

5 hours ago, spectre6000 said:

Total 21. 19

Sorry, somehow I've killed the line about seconds  (fourth) wheel before posting, and in there lies the explanation.
In A and B version, the center wheel bridge holds two holed jewels. These are described in my document linked above: Center wheel upper hole jewel, and Fourth wheel lower hole jewel, with their respective P/N. Check picture below.

P6211391.JPG.cc51b50dabadb29c5947fe70ba654eeb.JPG

With the C version they cleverly unified these two in a single one, and the bridge got a new P/N, also pictured

P6211392.JPG.519d91eb9b8957581288bc9a89b140ec.JPG

Incidentally, also the 6R15 got identical changes when going from B to C. So to resume:

7S26A and B:
2 - Winding reduction wheel has 2 holed jewels
2 - Center wheel has 2 holed jewels
6 - 3rd and escape have 3 each, 2 holed but only upper side are anti-shock with cap jewels.
2 - 4th (seconds) have 2 holed jewels
4 - Pallet fork have 2, it pivots on 2 more.
5 - Balance has 1, it pivots on (anti-shock) 4 more 
Total 21

7S26C:
2 - Winding reduction wheel has 2 holed jewels
1 - Barrel has 1 holed jewel
2 - Center wheel has 2 holed jewels, of these 1 is shared with the 4th wheel.
6 - 3rd and escape have 3 each, 2 holed but only upper side are anti-shock with cap jewels.
1 - 4th (seconds) has 1 holed jewel,
4 - Pallet fork have 2, it pivots on 2 more.
5 - Balance has 1, it pivots on (anti-shock) 4 more 
Total 21

There are also 23J versions, these have 2 upper cap jewels for 3rd and escape wheels on small plate.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So there are two jewels essentially in the same hole with (I assume) identical ODs and different IDs? Fascinating. Definitely did not notice that with them side by side.

That brings me back to my original thought process when I saw the main plate for the C having the jeweled barrel arbor: is it possible to combine parts to make the best of both worlds? It looks like you'd need the center wheel, center wheel bridge, and the seconds wheel (is it still called the fourth wheel when it's not the fourth in the train from the barrel?) from the A/B on the C... I'll have to fiddle around with it next time I'm at the bench. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • An update, for everyone who contributed advice, and for those who come after with a similar problem. Based on the answers received, I decided to work on the face of the hammer first. I used a square degussit stone to guarantee a vertical surface to work against, and ground the face back until it was square across 90% of the depth. I was conscious of the risk of removing too much material.* After I'd got the shape how I wanted it, I polished the surface with lapping film. To cut a long story short, it did the trick and the hammer hasn't slipped off the cam since. Of course, that wasn't the end of my problems. Have a look at this video and tell me what you think is wrong. https://youtu.be/sgAUMIPaw98 I solved it by rotating the minute counter finger on the chronograph (seconds) runner relative to the cam.  I'd be interested to hear your opinions on that. It seemed to be the right thing to do, but maybe I've introduced another problem I'm not aware of. * What is the correct relationship between the two hammers and cams, by the way? Should both hammers strike the cams exactly at the same time, or is it correct for the minute counter hammer to be a bit behind the seconds hammer? In this picture, I removed the adjusting screw at 1, and the hammers are contacting the cams simultaneously at 3 and 4. I had to turn the screw down tight to achieve this condition after stoning the seconds hammer and replacing the bridge.
    • It was easy enough to pop off. Once I had the cannon pinion hanging on the blades of the stump, I got my #2 tweezers on the gear attached to the staff and levered it down. That way none of the force was on the brass wheel itself.   I reinstalled it and the bridge, and it looks like a small but reasonable amount of end shake. It also spins easily with a blower. It stops quickly, but I think that's due to the large shoulder and about what I'd expect from this wheel.  
    • Oh, right. For some reason I was picturing a monocoque case in my head. Good looking watch!
    • Well said Ross. My reason for the thread, i like many of us dont want to lose the forum, such a well knitted group of individuals i feel. But things can happen out of anyone's control. Would be nice to have something in place just in case, if anyone has any ideas please speak up. 
    • Ok thanks Ross, I will give that a try!😁
×
×
  • Create New...