Jump to content

Illinois pocketwatch winding stem broken?


Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, my name is Ollie. I’m a motorsport engineering student from northwest England.

I’ve always been interested in the engineering behind mechanical watch movements, so I recently started collecting broken pocket watches with the intention to try to coax them back to life (as yet with surprisingly successful results!).

I have an Illinois pocket watch that came with the winder not attached to the watch. Upon dismantling I found there is a small ‘pushrod’ (please excuse my lack of knowledge), inside a separate winding stem with a square female drive which I assume the winder sits in and allows it to float backwards and forwards, pushing on the ‘pushrod’ so you can change the time. Shown in pictures.

How can the winder stay inside this mechanism, as it just slides straight out (there is no physical way of stopping it)?

I had wandered whether the ‘pushrod’ should be attached through the stem to the winder, which would hold it in place because the end of the ‘pushrod’ is flared preventing it from sliding through the winder.

Thanks, and I look forward to hearing the replies.

 

1FDE6DA6-5685-4865-A004-CD78C67A6975.jpeg

6F943D5A-50C5-40D5-9EEC-E65F7AFCC893.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does not appear to be broken, looks like a 2 piece stem. I believe it is supposed to be this way. There is supposed to be a collet that screws into the case that keeps the crown from slipping out. 

20200602_142014.thumb.jpg.50ea7251f1447d7ec18226822d76798e.jpg

20200602_142322.thumb.jpg.3093f547abc0e8f3998adb20700a14aa.jpg

20200602_142106.thumb.jpg.cb81d24ef36efd55ff3dddf91c2472c8.jpg

Now you're design may be different, but this is the most typical. I have had the segments with the fine slits break off and then the stem won't stay in place anymore.

Edited by FLwatchguy73
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply!

My crown however doesn’t look as though there is anything physically there to interact with a collet to prevent it from coming out (see picture).

It has to slide up and down inside the outer ‘sleeve’ and push on the ‘pushrod’ to allow you to change the time.

5FF8A010-3173-436C-9A75-9E9DF9516509.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Typically on the majority of American pocket watches the movement is set up similar to yours.  This is where the watch itself has no stem as that is in the case. So your movement is fine make sure when you're putting it together to lubricate all of the stuff associated with the setting so it's slide smoothly.

Link down below so you can look at the pictures. It's not really important but you're missing the micro regulator adjustment. You can still regulate the watch fine without it.

Then the crown is most definitely does not look like the right crown for this particular case. It almost looks more like a wristwatch style crown for American watches. I went attached some images you can see what the wristwatch version looks like. Also a picture of the typical pocket watch stem and sleeve arrangement.

https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/illinois/4927242

wristwatch stem sleeve.JPG

typical pocket watch stem sleeve.JPG

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

This negative-set design was used a lot on early wrist-watches and thin pocket watches, especially those with a low rigid-bow like the one you show. I wish you luck finding something. It's not going to be easy. The good thing is that the sleeve is not threaded into the pendant so the fit has more tolerance. Good luck.

BTW, that image is from the Chicago School of Watchmaking courses. They are very handy for working on old watches, pocket watches in particular. And they are widely available on the internet in digital form for not too much money. I have the hard copy as well as the digital. Today I reference the digital a bit more often. Enjoy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh nice. I have a similar wedge style stump for my staking tool, so I'll give that a shot. Thanks!
    • Thank you all for the replies!  Very informative! True enough, the Gamsol took some time to evaporate and does leave a residue. So not all naphtha are created equal!  Need to find alternatives then. i was able to try Hexane recommended by Alex and it seems great.  I wonder what the cons are?
    • Yeah, I saw that in the tech sheet but I don't see how it can be adequately cleaned with the friction pinion still in place. I've accidentally pulled the arbor right out of the wheel once when I used a presto tool to try and remove it. Mark shows how he does it with the Platax tool. Those are a little too pricey for me so I got one of these from Aliexpress and I just push down on the arbor with the end of my brass tweezers. That usually gets it most of the way out and then I just grab the wheel with one hand the and the friction pinion with the other and gently rotate them until it pops off. Probably not the best way but it's seemed to work for me so far.    
    • Thanks, Jon Sounds like a plan. Obviously I'll have the face on so do you think gripping with the holder will create any problems, but I will check in the morning to see how feasible it is but I assume it only needs to be lightly held. As for holding the movement instead of the holder won't be possible in this scenario as one hand will be puling on the stem while the other pushes the spring down. That was my initial concern is how the hell can I do this with only one pair of hands. All the other times I've had to remove the stem hasn't been a problem, apart from the force required to release the stem from the setting lever, but now I need to fit the face and hands its sent me into panic mode. If it had the screw type release things would be a lot simpler but that's life 😀   Another thing I will need to consider is once the dial and hands are fitted and the movement is sitting in the case I will need to turn it over to put the case screws in. I saw a vid on Wristwatch revival where he lightly fitted the crystal and bezel so he could turn it over, is this the only option or is there another method?      
    • Hi Jon, do You think that relation spring torque - amplitude is linear? I would rather guess that the amplitude should be proportional to the square of the torque. I had once idea to check it, but still haven't.
×
×
  • Create New...