Jump to content

Makers symbol and cal. No id?


Recommended Posts

I will be back with photo’s as I start to work on it.

I was just hoping that someone would recognize the S inside a square & circle. I have been flipping through the regular sources for manufacturer symbols, but this one didn’t show up.




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

This was quickly solved...

Movement was stamped AS 340 on the dial side.

The stamps I saw when opening the watch must have some other meaning than being a manufacturers symbol and cal. Number.

Thanks for all your efforts to help out!






Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A important thing to remember is companies who call themselves watch makers and proudly marked the watch usually do not make the movements.  the visible name and marking is only who cased up the watch. The movement maker for modern watches it's usually under the balance wheel. Older watches as you found sometimes is on the dial side. Occasionally the makers name might be hidden somewhere else.

Then worst-case is if you have a clear picture of the setting parts and the diameter of the movement there are books that you can look up what they call the fingerprint system because all the setting parts were unique At least in the older watches.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi John,

I fully agree with your statements here. What I sometimes find is ”brandnaming” on bridges etc. Where some of the more high-end watch brands try to make it look like the movement is ”their own” by having their name on the part.

But then you quickly realize that what you have is really a ”standard” movement from FHF or similar.

What intrigued me in this case was the rather special ”S in square & circle” symbol plus the number ”730” that must have had some meaning for someone at some time. But I guess that’s gone in the mists of watch making history....




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, bsoderling said:

What intrigued me in this case was the rather special ”S in square & circle” symbol plus the number ”730” that must have had some meaning for someone at some time. But I guess that’s gone in the mists of watch making history..

This is a watch repair discussion group usually when people make requests they're trying to identify a watch movement for repair purposes. So specifically I usually give answers for purposes of identification for repair.

Then before I answered the question I looked in the bestfit book. Am attaching the section of the book that covers symbols your symbol might be here they're not always alphabetical casually looking I didn't find it. This is by no means all of the symbols this is only from the time that the book was published in the 60s and it definitely does not cover every single symbol ever made in existence.

If you looking for historical data it would probably be best to find a watch collectors group and see if they can help.

 

 

 

Bestfit Encyclopedia symbols.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I missed this earlier. The dial isn't going into the holder, it should sit proud of it. This is what I am currently using which I print for each different movement.    
    • I didn't think pulling to set position would work harden the spring, in that position it is stressed where the arm starts. By work hardening i meant rapid polishing at that point, a bit like polishing a pivot work hardens as it compresses the steel. I doubt polishing by hand would achieve much in that respect though. Its finished, arm polished up mostly at the join to the bridge's main body. I'm ok with it, the screw holes aren't great as i had to open them up by redrilling and positioning it was difficult, I'm not much use with a loupe, opening up with a file might be a better option for me or i could just use the correct drill size 😅. And the detent is way too deep, i had to guess that with the stem release out of position and sat on top, but i only took one measure and went for it, no slowly slowly catch your monkey 😅. First go I'm happy , well sort of, it works and thats a big thing for me, next one will have a bit more finesse.  Anyone thats interested, after filing, i used a 2000 grade home made diamond  micro file and then 20 micron film, the film is much better than wet and dry, more stable to use and doesn't shed cheap grade grit everywhere , then auto polish on a sponge pad.
    • I'm assuming that every time you set the watch you are work hardening the detent spring, maximum hardening is  where it meets the plate due to maximum deflection.   That's why it snaps there.  The Young's modulus may be the same but after it's reached its maximum yeid strength it breaks.  My mechanic engineering is very rusty, correct me if I'm wrong. 
    • Ah ok yes that makes sense to polish it where the arm starts to form from the body of the bridge, i thought you meant the underneath of all the arm.
    • this is something I've never quite understood about the some of the Swiss companies. In 1957 Omega was using 9010 for the keyless parts with epilam. there's been a slow migration towards using heavier lubrication's but still typically oils and epilam to keep them in place. When it seems like 9504 works so much better.  
×
×
  • Create New...