Jump to content

Omega Dynamic auto/date movement retention


Recommended Posts

I have one of the above - a 1967/8 model and off hand I can't recall the cal. Someone else serviced it for me (a friend who has done lots of work on higher value/complex movements for me). After using it for a while - timing's very good - the split stem suddenly popped out. The movement had rotated slightly and I had to take it out end push the inner stem back into the setting position before re-casing the movement and refitting the outer stem. Everything was fine and I wore the watch on and off for a week or so, letting it run down and resetting occasionally. All good. Next time I picked it up to reset  it the stem fell out again and I can clearly see that the movement is slightly rotated. I bought a new stem with my next order from the cousins. However I don't think that wear is the problem. The original is mighty tight to refit. I think the problem is that the movement, er, moves and the stem parts slip apart horizontally (or nearly so.)

I don't want to pester my friend about this. We do barter deals and he's got a lot on his plate right now. So, can someone tell me how the movement is secured? I realise that it rotates clockwise from the 11.00 position to secure in position  but I also recall that it didn't feel like a very positive location. I could substitute the new outer stem temporarily as an experiment but I'm pretty sure this isn't the problem.

As an aside, split stems along with spring loaded detents are two pet hates.

Any relevant advice would be appreciated.

Roy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've asked. It came originally from SE Asia and anything is possible. Cosmetically good though. I've just opened it up -again - and it's a cal. 565. It doesn't do my nerves any good handling it because that unobtainable sweep second hand won't tolerate a single refit...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are different cases for these front-loading types, but it’s worth mentioning that some use plain, flat movement retaining tabs which are simply screwed into the movement to provide a key into the case. 
 

Also, do you have an original Omega tension ring crystal fitted?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've asked. It came originally from SE Asia and anything is possible. Cosmetically good though. I've just opened it up -again - and it's a cal. 565. It doesn't do my nerves any good handling it because that unobtainable sweep second hand won't tolerate a single refit...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, RoyC said:

It has the original crystal but the fit, while firm, is not what you would call tight.

 

That doesn’t sound right to me as it should be very tight. From memory, they aren’t just a plain ATC - they have a ridge around the edge which secures them at the correct depth. The tension ring is sized to secure the edge of the dial, at least on the Cosmic version anyway. 
 

Did you confirm that the two movement securing tabs are present or not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank you all for the replies!  Very informative! True enough, the Gamsol took some time to evaporate and does leave a residue. So not all naphtha are created equal!  Need to find alternatives then. i was able to try Hexane recommended by Alex and it seems great.  I wonder what the cons are?
    • Yeah, I saw that in the tech sheet but I don't see how it can be adequately cleaned with the friction pinion still in place. I've accidentally pulled the arbor right out of the wheel once when I used a presto tool to try and remove it. Mark shows how he does it with the Platax tool. Those are a little too pricey for me so I got one of these from Aliexpress and I just push down on the arbor with the end of my brass tweezers. That usually gets it most of the way out and then I just grab the wheel with one hand the and the friction pinion with the other and gently rotate them until it pops off. Probably not the best way but it's seemed to work for me so far.    
    • Thanks, Jon Sounds like a plan. Obviously I'll have the face on so do you think gripping with the holder will create any problems, but I will check in the morning to see how feasible it is but I assume it only needs to be lightly held. As for holding the movement instead of the holder won't be possible in this scenario as one hand will be puling on the stem while the other pushes the spring down. That was my initial concern is how the hell can I do this with only one pair of hands. All the other times I've had to remove the stem hasn't been a problem, apart from the force required to release the stem from the setting lever, but now I need to fit the face and hands its sent me into panic mode. If it had the screw type release things would be a lot simpler but that's life 😀   Another thing I will need to consider is once the dial and hands are fitted and the movement is sitting in the case I will need to turn it over to put the case screws in. I saw a vid on Wristwatch revival where he lightly fitted the crystal and bezel so he could turn it over, is this the only option or is there another method?      
    • Hi Jon, do You think that relation spring torque - amplitude is linear? I would rather guess that the amplitude should be proportional to the square of the torque. I had once idea to check it, but still haven't.
    • I did not. I thought about it, but I had cleaned it in my ultrasonic, and the tech sheet shows lubricating it in place already assembled, so I figured discretion was the better part of valor. Although since I have to depth the jewels anyway, maybe I pull the pinion off to rule it out 100% as part of the problem. Do you know if there's a safe way to do it? I don't want to use a puller because it would push down on the plane of the wheel, and that seems like a Bad Idea. I thought about using a roller table remover, but I don't think I have a hole stake pointy enough to push it down.
×
×
  • Create New...