Jump to content

Weird timegrapher results


Recommended Posts

Hello. Sorry if this question already has been answered, but I didn't know what to look for. 

I recently cleaned a certina 28-10 and it was keeping excellent time. The next morning I noticed it had lost a lot of time (about 40 seconds) and I put it on a timegrapher. The accuracy went from +4 to - 40.. I then re-regulated it and a few hours went. I then checked again and thw same problem had occurred. Only this time it had only gone from +5 to - 20. 

 

I also noticed that sometimes the amplitude drops to about 170 and the beat error goes up to 10ms for a few seconds and then returning to normal again. You can see that in the picture. This has happened several times. What could be the cause of all this?

IMG_20200526_155951.jpg

Edited by Bopmd
New headline
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this in a particular position? I think (and I'm still pretty new at this) it looks like the balance or hair spring are hitting/rubbing on something. For it to register as beat error, I imagine the timegrapher would have to have seen a fairly sharp noise, so I'd suspect hitting rather than rubbing. However, I think hitting would be more likely to make it run fast than slow, whereas rubbing would be more likely to slow it down. This is where it'd be nice if the timegrapher gave you the actual audio/trace rather than a beep/click. Check end play, and remove the balance cock/bridge to see if there are any tattle tale marks where it's hitting/rubbing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had an experience recently where a watch was experiencing similar problems. After MUCH looking I finally found the lower hole where barrel arbor rests was oval and barrel had lots of play. I happen to have a old movement so I switched the parts to the old movement plate and problem was resolved. So, I guess my reply is to see if barrel arbor upper/lower holes are worn and causing excess play and wobble.

Regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/26/2020 at 7:06 AM, Bopmd said:

I recently cleaned a certina 28-10 and it was keeping excellent time

We need a clear clarification of what cleaned means? In other words did you fully disassemble it did you change the Mainspring?

At 170° everything gets magnified so don't worry about the beat error it's only because the amplitude crashed and burned.

I assume the watch is currently cased up?

 

 

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&Certina_28_10

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/26/2020 at 7:22 PM, spectre6000 said:

 

Everything seems to be fine now. The accuracy is not receding anymore and the rest seems to have stopped. Sorry for the late replies and thank you for yours :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I picked up a similar amount of these jewels some years ago in a watch and clock fair. Every now and then they come in handy. This week I've got a rubbed in bombe jewel in the balance cock that is cracked and needs replacing. Very handy to have a vintage assortment of these type of jewels!
    • Great diagram with the teeth and pinion count. Simple way to reduce the speed of the hour wheel by the 12:1 minute wheel. Genius and yet so simple. Always good to reinforce the principal by what you have done in your drawing. Keep doing that. I had a drawing on my wall for years showing me this which is very similar to the drawing you have done. Here's a formula to work out the beats per hour of a watch movement. The movement's BPH is dictated by the wheel teeth and pinion count and the hairspring being vibrated to the correct BPH by finding the pinning up point on the hairspring using a vibrating tool.  The reason in the formula there is X2 on the top line is because there are two pallet stones.
    • So I just wanted to say "thank you" again.  The angle is the key bit it seems and yes, it did basically just fall, or float, back into position when I got it lined up just right. I had meant to add that now that I see how it goes in, I totally see how it came out in the first place, and that whomever cloned the original movement didn't pay much attention to the fine details around the setting or how it interfaces with the balance cock or the "rings" on the regulator and/or stud carrier arms.
    • Well I’ve never seen the make before and cannot find any info, I haven’t got it just yet it’s been left to me among a 1970’s sea master and a mid size yeoman. But if anyone has any information on this one please feel free to enlighten me, many thanks 
×
×
  • Create New...