Jump to content

Elgin 1907 Pocket Watch


Recommended Posts

Hello, I just cleaned and oil my first pocket watch, good news

is now runs !

It has a small lever on rim that locks watch so it cannot be time

set after movement is in case. From pocketwatchdatabase ad

for watch says: "Patent self-locking setting device."

 Why make watch so it cannot be set to the time by crown

after movement in case ?? You do have to remove movement

from case, change lever and then you can change time if lever

was in " lock ". When lever in " unlock " the crown setting always

works.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good morning and congrats on your success. Do you have photos of the watch and movement and the lever in question? The Lever you seem to be describing is typically for when the watch is outside the case so you can install the hands.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello, I wil add a photo to this reply. The lever is on front rim of movement I think about 3 oclock under dial plate. My

watch together working so I don't want to remove dial to get better picture. It took be hours to get hands on and

not hitting each other. I used my phone to take a picture every 5 seconds while I worked on watch, the picture I am

adding to this reply is one on them. Looking at picture about 1/2 inch to left of my thumb there is a silver lever on

rim held by one screw. The lever is connected to keyless yoke by linkage. When lever end (at edge of movement)

is down (level end can be moved about .25 inch on rim) the crown works for setting time. When lever is up the time

cannot be change using crown. Once movement is in case, the lever is held in place by case. Again, watch in case with lever

up time cannot be changed using crown. The advertisement for watch says " self-locking setting device ".

The lever pivots on single screw holding it in place.

Elgin-121400A.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, FLwatchguy73 said:

So yes, as I remember it that lever is for placing the hands on the watch, and this has been discussed here before. Others here will know exactly what it is called, it just escapes me. At the moment, naturally.

This lever does no lock the hands, it only stops the crown from

moving them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does the movement actually need to be removed from the case in order to change the position on the lever or do you just need to unscrew the bezel holding the glass on the front of the case? Perhaps it would be useful to post a pcture of teh watch in its case with the case open.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mooseface said:

Does the movement actually need to be removed from the case in order to change the position on the lever or do you just need to unscrew the bezel holding the glass on the front of the case? Perhaps it would be useful to post a pcture of teh watch in its case with the case open.

The rim lever is under the dial. The case has screw on front, body

with stem and crown, and screw on back. To change lever you must

remove movement from body. The movement. only will come out

the front and the movement. two screws that hold movement to

body are on rear of movement. Therefore, the front and back must be

removed, then take movement out of body. The inside body rim holds

lever in " locked " or " unlocked " position. A picture with case front

removed only shows the watch dial, the lever is under dial.

I guest this it the mystery, why would you make a watch that can be

put in case and the time cannot be set without removing movement

completely from case ?

I think you may be able to remove front, remove back, turn 2

movement holding screws 1/2 turn, tilt movement up just enough

to move rim lever then but back together.

I would take more pictures, but I had such a time with watch hands

I am not going to remove dial again.

Edited by lakeradio6
add more
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go to YouTube, search video by " staying sane "

see his video Elgin 293 Disassembly

at 4.01 into video you can see levet at 6 o'clock at very bottom of

screen, it is in up, locked poistion. see linkage to keyless works.

Movement put in case this way time cannot be change by crown.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I seem to remember reading somewhere that one of the requirements for some railway time keepers was that the hands could only be set by removing the bezel to access a lever in the rim of the movement so that they couldn't be inadvertently altered. I don't recall any need to remove the dial though. 

Is it possible that this is a movement that has been recased and redialed using parts that don't accommodate this feature? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I originally suspected that this was a re-cased railroad movement but having seen the patent I don't think it is. It is a stem setting not a lever setting but for some reason unknown that lever is there. now I am as intrigued as the OP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Marc said:

I seem to remember reading somewhere that one of the requirements for some railway time keepers was that the hands could only be set by removing the bezel to access a lever in the rim of the movement so that they couldn't be inadvertently altered. I don't recall any need to remove the dial though. 

Is it possible that this is a movement that has been recased and redialed using parts that don't accommodate this feature? 

The movement you are referring to is called " levet set ".

Lever set watch had a pull out levet at about 1 o'clock.

To set time remove just front of case, with finger nail pull out

lever then with crown set time. After settling time push lever

back in and then replace front, now crown will only wind watch.

Search YouTube lever set watch and see many videos.

A very good video of my mystery level at 3 oclock is on

YouTube: staying sane video " 1917 Elgin 16s grade 293 assembly.

at between 15 and 16 minutes into video Mr Sane clearly

moves rim lever to what I call down position . This allows setting

time using crown. I have asked Mr Sane what lever is for.

Not sure in he will answer or knows answer, but I would bet

he knew to move lever down.

The movement in his video is same as mine.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, mooseface said:

I originally suspected that this was a re-cased railroad movement but having seen the patent I don't think it is. It is a stem setting not a lever setting but for some reason unknown that lever is there. now I am as intrigued as the OP.

Please see my reply to Marc below

My watch and rim lever is very clear on YouTube video

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
×
×
  • Create New...