Jump to content

Demagnetizer question


Recommended Posts

I picked up one of those super cheap blue Chinese demagnetizers, and it was delivered today. I have a pocket watch that had its hair spring magnetized a long time ago, and I never really bothered messing with it until just now. It runs reasonably well, but according to my accuracy app is more than 1200 seconds a day fast. I can see that the hair spring is clearly bunched up on the one side, so all is checking out. 

I put the pocket watch on the demagnetizer, didn't follow the instructions because there are none, but got the gist from a collection of different sources and an idea of what's going on physically. With the watch sitting on the demagnetizer with it on, it hums and even rattles a little. I tried with another ferrous object, and it vibrated and hummed as well, so I guess that's fine and there are just moving parts.

The weird part is that the hair spring is still all bunched up. I guess it could be oil sticking the coils together, but given how it came to be magnetized, that would be quite a coincidence... Not only that, but now it wants to stop. I shake it, and it mostly stays stopped (it may oscillate a second or two), but shaken enough or just the right way and it'll go again. Enough time hasn't elapsed, but I imagine it's still over 1K seconds/day fast.

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The cheap China demagnetizers are ok. But you have to use them correctly. They do not come with a auto power down function like some expensive models.

What you have to do is press the red button, feel the object that you are trying to demagnetize vibrating, then slowly lift it away from the demagnetizer perpendicularly to about 6" - 8" away. Then release the red button. If this is done incorrectly, you could end up magnetizing the object instead.

You can get a small magnetic compass, even those small compasses attached to watch straps, to check for residual magnetism. There are some phone apps that can measure magnetism also.

Practice on your screwdrivers. Magnetize one of them first. Then hold it near the compass, the needle will move. Then demagnetize it. If done correctly, the needle shouldn't move anymore.

Best of luck.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's precisely what I did, several times. Is it possible the hairspring has a memory for the magnetized state and will require manipulation? Obviously there are other possible issues, but given that it kept great time prior to being placed in front of some computer speakers over night, then suddenly gained obscene amounts of time each day, I figured magnetized hairspring was obvious.

I'll be taking the watch completely down for a service soon, I just wanted to test what effect that had prior since it was obviously an issue so I know I did something positive.

The thing that's confusing me is why the watch would stop entirely and be difficult to restart as a result of using the demagnetizer correctly per the above method. The rattle on top of the hum seems like a clue, but it runs great (just super fast) otherwise.

Edited by spectre6000
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, oldhippy said:

While the watch is being demagnetized it vibrates a little, if dirt is in the movement it can get moved around and might move into the train and cause it not to function.

That strikes me as very plausible. I like it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JD Richards put up a video on a magnetized pocket watch hairspring. But it turned out to be a dirty hairspring. Watch that video and try cleaning the balance in lighter fluid. It happen to a Seiko watch that I serviced recently. It took a few cleaning cycles in lighter fluid to stop the spring from sticking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I picked up one of those super cheap blue Chinese demagnetizers, and it was delivered today. I have a pocket watch that had its hair spring magnetized a long time ago, and I never really bothered messing with it until just now. It runs reasonably well, but according to my accuracy app is more than 1200 seconds a day fast. I can see that the hair spring is clearly bunched up on the one side, so all is checking out. 
I put the pocket watch on the demagnetizer, didn't follow the instructions because there are none, but got the gist from a collection of different sources and an idea of what's going on physically. With the watch sitting on the demagnetizer with it on, it hums and even rattles a little. I tried with another ferrous object, and it vibrated and hummed as well, so I guess that's fine and there are just moving parts.
The weird part is that the hair spring is still all bunched up. I guess it could be oil sticking the coils together, but given how it came to be magnetized, that would be quite a coincidence... Not only that, but now it wants to stop. I shake it, and it mostly stays stopped (it may oscillate a second or two), but shaken enough or just the right way and it'll go again. Enough time hasn't elapsed, but I imagine it's still over 1K seconds/day fast.
Thoughts?






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

JD Richards put up a video on a magnetized pocket watch hairspring. But it turned out to be a dirty hairspring. Watch that video and try cleaning the balance in lighter fluid. It happen to a Seiko watch that I serviced recently. It took a few cleaning cycles in lighter fluid to stop the spring from sticking.

Just posted it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

My cheap blue demagnetizer also arrived last week. This week I was looking for a Seagull ST2130 on eBay and came across a guy who was selling a brand new one alongside a generic divers watch containing a genuine ETA 2824 that was running 30 minutes per day fast.

The ETA was apparently "less than 2 years old, but suddenly started running super fast" He had bought the seagull to replace the broken ETA, but in the end decided not to proceed and sold them both together instead.

When they arrived I tested the Seagull which was still in it's transport packaging (+1.3s / day!) and the genuine ETA in the watch (+1600 seconds / day). The fine adjustment had been set all the way to the minus limit.

WIthout even uncasing the watch I ran it over my £11 demagnetizer in 4x90 degree rotations, drawing it slowly away each time until I could sense no vibrations (it is only the 50Hz alternating magnetic field that causes the "feel", there are no moving parts inside) and in less than 1 minute it was running at a consistent -112s/day without any regulation so far.

So it appears that my £11 investment could have saved me over £100 in its first 10 seconds. :)

Regarding the sticking, I think as others have said, the demagnetizer probably has worked, but the hairspring coils, initially pulled together by the magnetism, are now being retained together by any residue on the hairspring.

 

 

2020-06-09 10.43.03.jpg

2020-06-09 10.43.40.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes I have that in my watch list a JUF if cheap enough I will have a go , if nothing else it will be good for spares
    • Less give a damn- more **BLEEP** it! …nice that it is keeping time I’ve done a couple of these (one with your assistance) and there’s a third that needs work on the tension between what drives the hands and the barrel. Did you have any issue with that? …and I saw Ranfft make a small comment in a thread re: pin pallets- a couple drops of Tillwich blu, let it run down the pins. It is good for 20 degrees of amplitude… I’m using this oil as a cheat code on my unmotivated Venus chrono…
    • This is a very sad day for the industry.. For most of us being amateurs the cost of replacing parts for ETA,s etc will be beyond affordability for the customers.   see full statement below   We have now received the decision from Judge Michael Green on whether or not the High Court has jurisdiction to hear our claim against Swatch, and sadly it is not the decision we had hoped for.   As we have pointed out in previous news items (see below),the rules that Judge Green had to apply strictly prevented him from examining in any way how the Swiss Court arrived at its verdict, even if it is blatantly obvious that the verdict is wrong.   As Swatch’s lawyer was summing up in the last few minutes oft he hearing, the Judge twice pinned him asking if it was alright if, as a result of the Swiss verdict, consumers had to pay 50% more for their watch repairs. After some stumbling, their lawyer’s reply was “Yes”, so  I am quite sure that Judge Green left his court fully aware that the Swiss verdict does not reflect the norms of British Competition Law. However, the rules simply do not allow him to take that simple fact into account.   Judge Green noted that our two arguments relating firstly to British Competition Law now being different from that of the EU, and secondly to the contention that the legality of the Authorised Service Networks has not been tested, had both been mentioned in the Swiss verdict. Because they had been mentioned, he felt that to allow us to argue them again would constitute re examining the Swiss case, and could not be allowed.   As to our claim that we were denied our right to be heard because our evidence was not considered, our lawyers had argued that the evidence we provided could not have been looked at because had the Swiss Court done so, it could not have reached the conclusion that it did. In his verdict, Judge Green highlighted general statements in the Swiss verdict that evidence had been looked at, and acknowledged the arguments we made to him, but again he considered that this was re-examining the Swiss verdict, and could not be permitted.   Our case has attracted considerable interest within the Legal community, and within minutes of the decision being made public we were approached for comment by one of the largest subscription news services, Global Competition Review. They asked us two very pertinent questions, and I reproduce them for you below along with our responses, as they neatly summarise the consequences arising from our case.   What are the key takeaways?   Enormous damage has been done to the fundamentals of UK and European Competition Law by the Swiss courts. It has always been the case that the effect on consumers and competition has to be considered in any decision making, but we now have a ruling that states even monopolists can remove wholesale markets from the supply chain without any consumer benefit based justification. Those entities looking to subvert Competition Law and exploit consumers for their own benefit will be looking at this very carefully.   Has the court made the wrong decision? If so, will you appeal?   The issue lies not with the High Court, but rather with cross border jurisdiction treaties that have no requirement in them for foreign jurisdictions applying UK law to take account of the Ratio Legis [a legal term for the fundamental reasoning why the law was written] of that law, and have no remedy within them for UK Courts to overcome decisions that clearly do not.    After eight years of work, and a very considerable sum in legal costs, I can not begin to tell you how disappointed I am at this outcome. For the time being, there is no further route through the British Courts that Cousins can follow. However, I promised that we would fight to the end, and that promise stands.   The UK is no longer part of the Lugano Convention, whose rules Judge Green has applied, and as yet nothing permanent has replaced it. The political tide turned against repair prevention by restricting supply of spare parts some time ago, and our efforts on behalf of the Watch Repair industry have resulted in high level contacts within several Government Departments. You can be sure that we will keep working to overcome this unjust situation that we now all find ourselves in.    I will keep you advised.   Kind regards   Anthony
    • Dell fancy a challenge🤣   https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/285785684626?itmmeta=01HT29WVJY21Q94C73GYHGBTFX&hash=item428a277a92:g:15YAAOSwNRVmBAUz&itmprp=enc%3AAQAJAAAA0DIe4QLQBW66rSyIMiyBuk8GY%2B86pQ%2BQnxGbcNq7egAGe5DIs9YMmiWJIbZtMSxwNJIiJxuojbq523IeUSBQ6pJEIQ0tfz2ChrBR03BksmKINyklg1IK4GAfAcYY9Hta9wVeSZSZN7ZCNAfZTgKs9c4%2BUIUZ3Qjc3QjUXDn2uPRo1FiYOEewMG5A26EXb%2BclBgrqtbOmM6P3bea%2F8ZImOAXNI1HtbmtMk84pIGoM6ISwaM1PKFuADtTFMccS5e3ZjndCbXYXHrW3CecsV0edw3M%3D|tkp%3ABk9SR8q588nQYw Darwin’s theory of evolution has not been proven to be absolutely.  😀 
    • A already know the size movement I have the problem is the dial a had purchased has a dimension 20.6mm wide a want to find a watch case that going to fit the dial perfectly 
×
×
  • Create New...