Jump to content

Fusee Clock keeping poor time


4ster

Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, 4ster said:

Sure looks like the cone does not match and equalize the properties of the spring

Yes. I would have a look at the spring. Rather than assume the spring is incorrect, I would check to see if the spring is very "set".

I think I'm possibly correct in saying that according to Hooke's law, you may actually get relatively more torque at the start of winding when the spring is set due to the angle of rotation, but I've never measured this myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, if the spring is too strong it may be too short and nearing or at the end of wind when fully wound. Even with the fusee it may be giving too much power, which with a recoil escapement can actually drop the amplitude due to strong friction during recoil. My gut says slightly weaker spring and slightly lighter pendulum, I do a number of clocks in this pendulum length and 150g is average, springs maybe 0.25 or 0.3 thick, no fusee and they keep time well. Recoil escapement.

There's a lot at play, a well proportioned recoil escapement can give a deadbeat a run for its money on precision. I go with OH's gut feeling that the escapement is dry and possible spring issue. My first step would be get a bunch of Moebius 8300 on those escape teeth and note the difference. Check palettes (again Old Hippy). They should be smooth and polished. If that doesn't help pull it all apart and check the spring. You want generally 3/4 to 1 turn pretension, and have a reserve of 1 wind when the fusee stop piece comes in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:

My gut says slightly weaker spring and slightly lighter pendulum, I do a number of clocks in this pendulum length and 150g is average

I don't think these clocks where designed to use a light weight pendulum the eight day fusee timepiece movements used a standardised pendulum and bob which is heavy at 250 to 260 grams. Williamsons aim in production was to have completely interchangeable parts between clocks which they achieved at the Salisbury factory before it burnt down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another thing you can do why the movement is out of the case is inspect how much torque is getting through the train of wheels at different states of wind - have a feel at how much force there is turning the escape wheel while the pallets are removed. This may give you a better idea about the state of the spring, or if as suggested by others, if escapement friction is upsetting things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think these clocks where designed to use a light weight pendulum the eight day fusee timepiece movements used a standardised pendulum and bob which is heavy at 250 to 260 grams. Williamsons aim in production was to have completely interchangeable parts between clocks which they achieved at the Salisbury factory before it burnt down.
Yeah I was reading about that (the interchangeability), figured the pendulum weight was maybe slightly heavier on a fusee. The clocks I see here with a similar pendulum/escapement are typically "neuchateloise" with either thin springs making 14ish turns of wind with a well engineered outer hook (very even power delivery) or similar with a close to deadbeat escapement and good hook- bridles, not holes, and a more typical 6 turns of wind.

My gut feeling is too strong mainspring (short) and possibly dry and/or damaged pallets.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just a note for those who come searching for information on this topic in the future.  I did eventually find the Mark's video on how to replace these springs, as someone observed, he does in fact make the replacement look easy.  (It actually is relatively easy once you have the knack of it.) If you're enrolled in one of Mark's online courses, the demonstration of how to replace this spring is in the Bonus Videos section of his course site, and is called "C2B1 – Sea-Gull Style Shock Springs".
    • If the metal was twice as thick, it wouldn't snap so easily.  The thickness is governed by the space available so you can't use thicker metal.  If you glued two pieces together, the likelihood of snapping would be reduced.  That's my theory anyway, could be wrong. 
    • there are various approaches to learning watch repair. A lot of people want to jump right in and every single watches something to be repaired restored. But other times like this it's disposable it's here for you to learn and when you're through learning you throw it away. yes you definitely should try this you have a learning movement you need to learn and the best way to learn is by doing something.
    • Sorry, the friction will be so great that the wheel will barely turn, if the movement will start at all, the amplitude will be verry lo.
    • If I can’t re-pivot the wheel, the logical thing to do is to descend the pivot hole.  Plan is to either stick a suitably sized hole jewel (from a barrel bridge or something) or fashion a blob of epoxy on the underside of the escape wheel cock so the wheel sits on its one pivot on the base plate and the staff with the broken off pivot (which I’ll polish as best as I can) becomes the upper pivot. As long as it doesn’t foul the 4th wheel it should work? I know it’s a bodge job, and if this were a rare movement, or belonged to someone else I would not do this. I’m just interested to see if I can get the thing to run. 
×
×
  • Create New...