Jump to content

What a hideous piece of junk.


oldhippy

Recommended Posts

https://www.the-saleroom.com/en-gb/auction-catalogues/john-nicholson/catalogue-id-srjo10202/lot-75ff7c44-2860-41c3-a77b-a9180113c51a

Idiots do buy them and quite a few go through the auction houses the one in the above link fetched £600.00 before commission, you would have to be a uneducated moron to part with that kind of money for one or any kind of money for that point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/28/2020 at 12:02 PM, oldhippy said:

Yes folks, brought to us from our good friends ebay. Would you pay £400.00 for this? If so you need locking up.:D

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/ANTIQUE-STYLE-LARGE-REPEATING-REPEATER-ALARM-ENAMEL-PANEL-CARRIAGE-CLOCK/133396725177?hash=item1f0f107db9:g:QuwAAOSwIWBdmk3O

Yes OH, but it does have a nice hammer for the bell...lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The one in your link is a genuine french carriage clock but the platform escapement is a modern Swiss replacement, many clock makers replace platforms that have been broken or damaged rather than repair, this effects the value and integrity of the clock.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The clock in your link is typical of French production of between 1890 and 1920, this was the period of peak production for the french carriage clock makers, some cases are plated and some are made with a gold ormolu finish but the vast majority are just polished brass so polishing them up and re lacquering would be the best way of cleaning the clock and preventing tarnish.

You can usually spot ormolu cases by the very rich gold colour that has a slight satin sheen these cases should not be polished because it will ruin the finish of the clock.

Another thing to watch for when buying carriage clocks is the glass although some attempt was made by the French to standardise glass sizes it was not very successful it is important that the glass is tight fitting and free from damage because it protects the clock movement from dust, broken glass is very expensive to replace because ideally each piece has to be cut for the individual clock, so if you have a couple of broken pieces of glass it can make the clock all but worthless and uneconomical to repair.

Edited by wls1971
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HectorLooi said:

Is there any way to date a clock like this?

When restoring a piece like this, should the original patina be left as it is? Or can it be polished to a shine and relacquered? Or would that be a sacrilege? 

You need to be careful, not all cases are brass, some are bronze. Polishing and lacquering brass cases will not effect the value of the clock. You are just restoring it to how it was in its original way. 

    wls1971, is perfectly correct a replacement platform deprecates the value of the clock.

If for some reason you have to replace the platform, normally the balance staff or the cylinder has broken, then the original platform should be kept with the clock. Most repairers say it is not cost effective to make a staff, I shouldn't think there are many around who would undertake making a cylinder. One other thing with carriage clocks when it comes to re-bushing, if the clock has been repaired correctly you shouldn't be able to see the new work it is called invisible re-bushing. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Colditz said:

OH

Totally agree. Very Tarts Rococo. Not my cuppa at all. £400? I'd rather get a Gents Pulsynetic master clock with all the little penny weights.

I've never heard of a pulsynetic clock before this. I watched a few YouTube videos to find out more. 

Oh noooo.... I think I'm hooked! :startle:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a very nice Bronze French carriage clock. I'm posting this so you can see the difference between Bronze and Brass, One thing I forgot to mention Bronze is heavier then Brass.

  https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Antique-19th-C-French-Bronze-Striking-Repeater-Alarm-8Days-Mantel-Carriage-Clock/383534583028?hash=item594c714cf4:g:VCEAAOSwPz1eso69

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Put the movement in a movement holder and it will be supported as you push down on the setting lever post to release the winding stem. Make sure the post is over the shoulder of the movement holder so what you are pressing down on is supported. As a general rule, hold the movement and not the movement holder. Replace the hands when the movement isn't in the case and support the centre jewel (if it has one) on a hard surface or staking block when replacing the hands to stop the jewel accidentally moving or even coming out. A dedicated movement holder with a central jewel support is even better, but pricey
    • It might help us if we knew which watch like model number.
    • Hi, guys I have a bit of a predicament and hopefully, somebody can advise. I'm working on a Roamer MST 521 where the movement is extracted from the crystal side. I'm now at the final hurdle where I need to replace the movement back into its case but I'm not sure of the correct procedure. I still need to fit the hands but that's where the problem lies. If I insert the winding stem to test the hands for correct alignment I will need to turn the movement over to release the stem again it's the spring-loaded type and needs a small bit of force to push down but with the hands fitted, I don't think I can do this on a cushion without causing some damage to the hands and that's the last thing I want to do, this watch has already been a love-hate relationship and I'm so close to boxing this one off which I'm counting as my first major project.  The other option is to case the movement then fit the hands and hope everything is okay. I've already broken the original winding stem but managed to find a replacement, the last one in stock, so I'm a bit reluctant to keep removing it. Any suggestions would be appreciated. 
    • I would go for the dearer spring. You won't need to remove the spring from the carrier ring and then use a mainspring winder to get it into the barrel, for a start. Also that spring is closer to the needed dimensions, especially the length. The length plays a part in the mainsprings strength. If you double the length you will half the force (strength) of the spring and vice-versa. A spring with 20 mm less length would be about 7% shorter, so technically would be 7% more strength, but I find halving this number is closer to real-world findings, so the spring would be about 3 to 4% more strength/force. On a mainspring that ideally kicks out 300 degrees of amplitude, a 3% increase in amplitude would be 309 degrees. Increasing or decreasing the length of the mainspring will affect the power reserve to a greater or lesser degree. It depends how much shorter or longer it is. I've attached a lesson regarding mainsprings, focussing on the size and strength of the spring within the barrel, you might find helpful. Unfortunately it is a PDF converted from a PowerPoint presentation, but only a slide was lost that was originally a video of fitting a mainspring   Lesson 5 The mainspring.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...