Jump to content

Crystal Removal Problem


Recommended Posts

Upon removing an acrylic crystal from a Seiko case, the crystal cracked at the base leaving the rest of it stuck in the case. It appears that whoever worked on the watch previously had glued the crystal in place as I’m unable to pry the rest of it out but only chip away at it. There is a lip on the inside diameter which makes it difficult to get a knife underneath the crystal. Any suggestions on how to best to remove the crystal?

crystal_2.JPG

crystal_3.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi   I would suggest warming it up to soften the glue and when its all out clean up with alchohol.  When I say heat it up , not with a blow torch , place some steel plate or such on the gas and warm it up  place  the case on the plate untill warmed  , wearing gloves remove the remains carefully .  use some dental picks if you can or somthing of that ilk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This case looks familiar... with some Seiko's of this era the crystal is kind of like a tension ring crystal with the tension ring removed, and the space in which the tension ring would fit in the crystal, fits onto a lip on the case. The bezel is then a tight fit around the crystal, which creates a better seal. Hope this description makes sense...

But if it is of this type, popping off the bezel may make cleaning up this mess a whole lot easier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Lawren5 said:

The case appears to be machined from a single block with no removable bezel. I'll give the heating method a try.

Looking at the second picture in detail suggests that that case does indeed have a removable bezel... What is the exact model number of the watch?  From that we can determine the Seiko part number for the crystal. Some Seiko's of this period have a replacement crystal that comes cemented into a new bezel, quite often hard to get hold of at a reasonable price, if at all. I have got round this in the past by utilising the old bezel and fitting a generic crystal, fixing with UV setting glass adhesive...

Edited by JohnD
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, watchweasol said:

Hi   I would suggest warming it up to soften the glue and when its all out clean up with alchohol.  When I say heat it up , not with a blow torch , place some steel plate or such on the gas and warm it up  place  the case on the plate untill warmed  , wearing gloves remove the remains carefully .  use some dental picks if you can or somthing of that ilk.

      200 + degrees.    they make a melt pencil just for this AND just in case epoxy was used.  vin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, JohnD said:

Looking at the second picture in detail suggests that that case does indeed have a removable bezel... What is the exact model number of the watch?  From that we can determine the Seiko part number for the crystal. Some Seiko's of this period have a replacement crystal that comes cemented into a new bezel, quite often hard to get hold of at a reasonable price, if at all. I have got round this in the past by utilising the old bezel and fitting a generic crystal, fixing with UV setting glass adhesive...

let us know how you make out.   vin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, as it turns out the watch did have a removable bezel. Upon examination, it appeared not to have a bezel as there was no visible gap where a knife could be inserted and the fit was so precise that the case all looked like one piece. However, with a lot of pressure with a knife I was able to work around it and pry it off. Once off, the crystal was easily removed.

Thanks to everyone for all of your comments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Lawren5 said:

The watch is model #7625-7003.

Sadly one of the 7625 watch models that Boley doesn't quote a crystal for...:(

 

Boley 7625.jpg

What is the diameter?

Edited by JohnD
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Lawren5 said:

OK, as it turns out the watch did have a removable bezel. Upon examination, it appeared not to have a bezel as there was no visible gap where a knife could be inserted and the fit was so precise that the case all looked like one piece. However, with a lot of pressure with a knife I was able to work around it and pry it off. Once off, the crystal was easily removed.

Thanks to everyone for all of your comments.

good to hear, that what this forum is about...:thumbsu:

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • in general this shouldn't be any change. but in general questions like this it be nice to know the specifics of the watch in other words how was it performing before it was cased up and what is it doing now.
    • just as a reminder this watch is a Swatch group product. This will bring up a problem like spare parts and technical information. that I found some links to some information on when I talk about your watch and some of the technical and basically your watch is equivalent to 2834-2 for which I'm attaching the technical sheets. But equivalent does not mean exactly the same you want to do a search on the group for C07 as we discussed this watch before including the technical differences how it's supposed to be regulated and basically because it's watch group there is no parts availability. https://calibercorner.com/eta-caliber-c07-xxx/   https://www.chrono24.com/magazine/eta-movements-from-the-2824-2-to-the-powermatic-80-p_80840/ https://www.watchuseek.com/threads/h-10-movement-details.4636991/ eta CT_2834-2_FDE_481857_15.pdf
    • people be honest.... Swatch is evil for the watchmakers and repairers, BUT not everything in watches from Switzerland is from the Swatch-Group. As far as i know, Selitta got sacked by Swatch as a Movement-Assembler for them and they started to produce Movements in their own Name with slight Modifications. As far as i know, they sell Parts to the Market for their Movements. In most cases, if a ETA-Movement fails, it is a valid Option to replace it with a Selitta Movement, which i consider the Solution for this Mess with the Swatch-Group...... I have no Connection to anybody at Selitta, but being a Swiss-Guy, i still like to have Swiss-Made Watches, but not from the Swatch-Group.   ok ? regards, Ernst
    • Just one more greedy act by Swatch. They started a number of years ago here in the US..cutting off supplies to watchmakers that could build complications that many Swatch houses couldn't even touch. Old school masters who had gone through some of the most prestigious houses in the world. Otto Frei has some statements on their page about it. I tell all my customers to avoid new Swiss watches like the plague,..unless they just want an older one in their collection that still has some parts out on the market, or they have really deep pockets and don't mind waiting months and paying through the nose to get it back. Plenty of others to choose from..IE Seiko,..or other non-swiss brands Even a number of Chinese brands are catching up with the Swiss,..and I think that in time, their actions will be their downfall
    • Yes. If that's not what you are experiencing...start looking for something rubbing. A 1st guess is that one of the hands is rubbing against the hole in the center of the dial. Especially if you now have lower amplitude in face up/ face down positions.
×
×
  • Create New...