Jump to content

Help with Amplitude Please


Recommended Posts

The keeper plate or gear bridge may have been previously shimmed up, the shim gets washed away during the clean and you wont notice it. A bodge solution that works but you can hardly take pride in it. ALSO, I take another look at cap jewels on both side, are they flat or concave,if flat a concave one may save you the trouble of pivot shortening.Bridge lay out looks similar to fhf28, I think you may find concave cap jewels out of fhf28. As said moving end stones is a bad idea as they are known to fall off and wonder loose inside the movement in a couple of month.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The keeper plate or gear bridge may have been previously shimmed up, the shim gets washed away during the clean and you wont notice it. A bodge solution that works but you can hardly take pride in it.ALSO, I take another look at cap jewels on both side, are they flat or concave,if flat a concave one may save you the trouble of pivot shortening.Bridge lay out looks similar to fhf28, I think you may find concave cap jewels out of fhf28.As said moving end stones is a bad idea as they are known to fall off and wonder loose inside the movement in a couple of month.

Hello Nucejoe. This topic has really taken off again all of a sudden. My route forwards is buy another movement, exactly the same calibre, and start to swap out one-by-one the following parts:-

1. Top and bottom end stones
2. Escapement
3. Bridge

One of these absolutely must correct the problem, when it does I can investigate the difference and politely identify the fault. This may not be the way forward for an expert with all the tools to his hand, but to an engineer the logical approach will certainly isolate the problem and I will learn from it.

Fortunately a second ‘running’ movement will not cost the earth.

Stay safe and keep well
Deggsie


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You need to look at the pivot and cap 5 times before you decide to shorten the pivot. If after much examination and a good night sleep, you still feel a need to shorten the pivot, then use a Jacot tool with the right lantern and hole size on the end.  Or a lathe and measure, measure, measure.

You remind me of my dads words... always measure twice and cut once. [emoji846]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arriving late to the party would you refresh my memory? So I always like to know what was the condition of the watch in before? Then what have you done to it?
Then looking at this discussion one of the things that's really helpful for diagnosing problems is a timing machine. I know hobbyists are operating under a budget but the Chinese timing machines are very affordable work really well and they let you see things that you really can't see any other way. Then if you're having a problem they are even more helpful.  Or basically I think you're insane to repair watches without a decent timing machine which is now affordable versus what it used to be.
I just find it interesting that the pivot is too long and wondering how that has occurred? Especially if this was a running watch before. Also if the place is ben what is the end shake issue like for the other wheels? Also if you shortened the pivot remember to restore it to its original shape otherwise you're going to have issues because you change the shape of the pivot. Also did you look carefully at the pivots themselves to make sure that there not bent.
 
http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&AS_1194
https://watchguy.co.uk/cgi-bin/lift_angles

Hello John. Thank you for taking the time to write such a detailed reply to my topic. I do have a timegrapher, but seriously you don’t need it to diagnose this issue. Poor amplitude is resolved by simply slackening the escapement end stone keeper plate. Immediately this is done, amplitude is restored.

As already detailed I have swapped the end sones around (dial side to balance side) no difference. If I can find the official length and tolerances for the escapement, I will bet myself it’s within specification. That means the bridge is bent down. But, I’m not going to guess, I’m going to properly ascertain the root cause.

You asked how the watch came to me.... it was a non runner, not running at all and the main spring was incorrect for calibre.

There are poise issues which I will tolerate for now - my learning will not happen in a day [emoji3].

Keep safe John and thank you for your helpfulness

Kind regards
Deggsie


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


You remind me of my dads words... always measure twice and cut once. [emoji846]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I am a dad and my dad said the same for me, plus I screwed up a few balance staffs by trimming them down too much: lesson learned.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jdrichard said:

I screwed up a few balance staffs by trimming them down too much

So, the jacot tool helps you mold a rounded top on the pivot end? Apologies if you already explain this in your jacot tool videos. If so, please let me know and I'll have another, more attentive ;), look. Thanks!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, the jacot tool helps you mold a rounded top on the pivot end? Apologies if you already explain this in your jacot tool videos. If so, please let me know and I'll have another, more attentive [emoji6], look. Thanks!

Yes, you use the lantern end that has many sized holes where the pivot end protrudes and you can use a pivot file or stone to take off material in a flat manner and round the end by angling the pivot file as the part turns.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jdrichard said:

Hey, this is my video as well.

Yes I know the last time Balloon chucks came up it was just a fast easy way to show how it's done.

Then for those not familiar with them they also come in  different physical sizes with different hole openings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have a good selection of Horology tools there. If I were your neighbour I would have taken up house burglary by now[emoji56]I’m very envious. And please keep up the videos I really enjoy them - especially the card tricks [emoji38]

 

Regards

Deggsie

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have a good selection of Horology tools there. If I were your neighbour I would have taken up house burglary by now[emoji56]I’m very envious. And please keep up the videos I really enjoy them - especially the card tricks [emoji38]
 
Regards
Deggsie
 
 
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thanks. I I did put on a ring thru finger trick. Just look up jdrichard soft ring or removable fingers.

PS: I have a big safe:)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello all. I hope you’re keeping well in these frustrating times. Just to keep you updated on my findings. I bought another AS movement and found the following: -

1. Original problematic escape wheel staff was longer.

2. The bridge on the problematic movement was quite dipped down. Straightening alone wasn’t enough to resolve the issue

3. I straightened bridge and swapped the escapement wheel. The end stone can now be installed tight and minimal end shake is felt.

Result: The movement is now running as well as expected by me with an amplitude of circa 270 degrees. I also have a NOS balance complete on order which will hopefully alleviate the issues of the watch losing amplitude when not in DU or DD position

I’ll post a photo or two when it’s all re-cases and has a nice strap fitted.

Stay safe.

Kind regards
Deggsie



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you have nailed it Rodabod. When I was looking for a spare AS1194 I did see that some were built with rubbed in jewels and non Incabloc on the balance wheel. It’s good to get this little niggling problem resolved at last.

Regards
Deggsie


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/17/2020 at 1:10 AM, Deggsie said:

I also have a NOS balance complete on order which will hopefully alleviate the issues of the watch losing amplitude when not in DU or DD position

So, what amplitude are you getting in the other positions? I read/heard somewhere that 220 degrees is the minimum amplitude needed to defeat gravity. I'm certainly not an expert, but I'd say that if you get let's say around 240 degrees in the other positions the amplitude is probably in the acceptable range!? I've been struggling with amplitude myself, a Unitas 6325, and I have now reached approx. 282 degrees dial up/dial down and approx. 246 in all other positions. It's not perfect, but I've decided to call it a day. At my current skill level there's nothing more I can do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, what amplitude are you getting in the other positions?

I have 270 to 280 in DU and DD positions. 210 to 240 in all other positions. The beat error increases when not in DU/DD.

 

For a 1940’s movement I’m happy with this. The hair spring is as well formed as I can get it and I fear if I tweak it any more it may fatigue and break.

 

Poising is definitely out, but I shall not be trying to rectify that just now as I don’t have the correct tooling. All that will come later - hopefully[emoji848]

 

Have you considered installing a new mainspring? That is after all the root of all energy in the watch. The stored spring energy is converted to kinetic energy in the balance minus some losses due to sound and kinetic energy required to move the indicators (hands).

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/23/2020 at 6:04 PM, Deggsie said:

I have 270 to 280 in DU and DD positions. 210 to 240 in all other positions. The beat error increases when not in DU/DD

Well, for a 1940s movement and if it is somewhat consistent over time, i.e. not dropping in amplitude too much after 24h of a full wind, I'd say that's probably as good as it is going to get, unless you take some sort of drastic action, but I see no need for that. I think you're done with it. Congrats! :thumbsu:

On 5/23/2020 at 6:04 PM, Deggsie said:

Have you considered installing a new mainspring? That is after all the root of all energy in the watch.

Not sure if I mentioned my Unitas cal. 6325 in this thread but I guess I did!? If that's what you're referring to then yes that's exactly what I did. However I made a whole array of adjustments and if interested I've listed them in this post.

Edited by VWatchie
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • See, what has happen is a normal consequece of the reducing the hammer size and changing it's shape by the removing metal from it. But here the hammer is adjustable and just adjustment is needed to correct, and this is what You have done. There is a rule for the adjustment and it is that the hammer must lay firmly on the seconds counter heart and there should be a litle free play in the same time of the minutes counter heart/hammer which alows counter movement of about 0.5 min on the small dial hand (+/- 0.25). Of course, there is no way to make one hammer to delay from the other, as they are one single part. What has changed too is the slope of the hammer head and thus the orientation of the heart has changed, and thus the switching finger position. This led to need of the finger position correction. The rule here is that switching of the minute counter has to start when the seconds counter hand is on '59'. Of course, the seconds hand must be positioned as so the resetting is at '0' exactly. If switching is earlier than 59, there will be no problem, but it will be wrong as reading can be not correct. If the switching starts later, the problems that You described can happen.
    • Thanks, This watch was in a box of old scrape units that a friend gave me. They used to be his late father's who was a watchmaker before the war and then continued later in life. I picked this one out as it looked like it had potential, and I liked the dial, it's been a bit of a learning curve for a beginner but I was determined to get it going. Now I'm on the final lap it feels good. I'm just wondering whether to invest in a decent set of hand placement tools or stick with the cheap Chinese red thing I have, decisions decision 😆
    • An update, for everyone who contributed advice, and for those who come after with a similar problem. Based on the answers received, I decided to work on the face of the hammer first. I used a square degussit stone to guarantee a vertical surface to work against, and ground the face back until it was square across 90% of the depth. I was conscious of the risk of removing too much material.* After I'd got the shape how I wanted it, I polished the surface with lapping film. To cut a long story short, it did the trick and the hammer hasn't slipped off the cam since. Of course, that wasn't the end of my problems. Have a look at this video and tell me what you think is wrong. https://youtu.be/sgAUMIPaw98 The first four attempts show (0 to 34 sec.) the chrono seconds hand jumping forwards, the next two attempts (35 to 47 sec.) seem "normal", then on the seventh attempt (48 to 54 sec.) the seconds hand jumps to 5 sec. and the minute counter jumps to 1. The rest of the video just shows repeats of these three variants. I solved it by rotating the minute counter finger on the chronograph (seconds) runner relative to the cam.  I'd be interested to hear your opinions on that. It seemed to be the right thing to do, but maybe I've introduced another problem I'm not aware of. * What is the correct relationship between the two hammers and cams, by the way? Should both hammers strike the cams exactly at the same time, or is it correct for the minute counter hammer to be a bit behind the seconds hammer? In this picture, I removed the adjusting screw at 1, and the hammers are contacting the cams simultaneously at 3 and 4. I had to turn the screw down tight to achieve this condition after stoning the seconds hammer and replacing the bridge.
    • It was easy enough to pop off. Once I had the cannon pinion hanging on the blades of the stump, I got my #2 tweezers on the gear attached to the staff and levered it down. That way none of the force was on the brass wheel itself.   I reinstalled it and the bridge, and it looks like a small but reasonable amount of end shake. It also spins easily with a blower. It stops quickly, but I think that's due to the large shoulder and about what I'd expect from this wheel.  
    • Oh, right. For some reason I was picturing a monocoque case in my head. Good looking watch!
×
×
  • Create New...