Jump to content

Can anyone confirm a genuine Omega Seamaster?


Recommended Posts

Hi Guys, 

 

Can anyone help me confirm if this 1964 Omega Seamaster is genuine. To me the Cal.269 and Case serial look genuine. The silvered Dial also looks genuine to me and the fakers back then i don't think would have attempted the silvered Dials. There is a slight miss centring of the Seamaster wording. I guess in the 1960's there were slight imperfections on these Seamasters?

As i'm new to this open to views.

Thanks,

Tom 

 

IMG_20200416_195557.jpg

IMG_20200416_103218.jpg

Screen Shot 2020-04-17 at 09.19.35.png

Screen Shot 2020-04-17 at 09.19.56.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the pictures I've seen online the Seamaster lettering has been both left and right of center. It could also be a factory redial if it was ever sent in for an overhaul. To the best of my knowledge Omega will replace the dial if yours is trashed. This is were many odd variants appear. They're legit Omega, but not quite exactly like the vintage originals.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

Other than the fact it could have had a re dial or a restored dial  all looks well

 

1 hour ago, FLwatchguy73 said:

From the pictures I've seen online the Seamaster lettering has been both left and right of center. It could also be a factory redial if it was ever sent in for an overhaul. To the best of my knowledge Omega will replace the dial if yours is trashed. This is were many odd variants appear. They're legit Omega, but not quite exactly like the vintage originals.

Im new to collecting so would a re dial effect the value of the watch significantly?

I wouldnt mind purchasing another vintage omega in the future so need as much help as possible. 

I paid £475 which i thought was in the correct range? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as I know yes, but only slightly and only to very knowledgeable collectors. Now, when you're dealing with very rare models, 100% originality is vital. The value of those is greatly effected. In your case I wouldn't think it wouldn't be effected much. Please remember, were only speculating. There are experts out there that will know definitively. From what I know, you paid a fair price for that watch. It should hold it's value at the very least. I have 2 vintage Omega's myself as I'm a huge fan of the brand. I didn't get them as investment opportunities, I got them because I liked them and the prices were amazing, especially my quartz.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, FLwatchguy73 said:

As far as I know yes, but only slightly and only to very knowledgeable collectors. Now, when you're dealing with very rare models, 100% originality is vital. The value of those is greatly effected. In your case I wouldn't think it wouldn't be effected much. Please remember, were only speculating. There are experts out there that will know definitively. From what I know, you paid a fair price for that watch. It should hold it's value at the very least. I have 2 vintage Omega's myself as I'm a huge fan of the brand. I didn't get them as investment opportunities, I got them because I liked them and the prices were amazing, especially my quartz.

 

38 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

£475 that's about right.

Thank you very much guys! much appreciated 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For Omega watches if you search online for your case number 125.007-63 Then look at the images you'll see all kinds of pictures of your watch. You will note there does seem to be some variations in the dial though.

Then a lot of the watch companies will do searches of their archive usually at a price. Then Omega at the third link below you can enter in a variety of parameters like the reference number which is the case number providing you enter it correctly and it will give you information which I have at the first link. Somewhere Omega change their reference or the case back number where after the decimal point which is really just a separator you have to have four digits. So if you add in a zero the search will work correctly 125.0007

 

https://www.omegawatches.com/watch-omega-seamaster-30-st-125-0007

https://www.omegawatches.com/en-us/customer-service/certificates-and-extracts

https://www.omegawatches.com/en-us/vintage-watches

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice watch and the price is like spot on as OldHippo suggests
A quick check shows

Cal 269 = OK
21117988 = 1963 = OK
125.007 - 63 = OK

But the dial, on this one someone probably been a little bit creative.
 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

For Omega watches if you search online for your case number 125.007-63 Then look at the images you'll see all kinds of pictures of your watch. You will note there does seem to be some variations in the dial though.

Then a lot of the watch companies will do searches of their archive usually at a price. Then Omega at the third link below you can enter in a variety of parameters like the reference number which is the case number providing you enter it correctly and it will give you information which I have at the first link. Somewhere Omega change their reference or the case back number where after the decimal point which is really just a separator you have to have four digits. So if you add in a zero the search will work correctly 125.0007

 

https://www.omegawatches.com/watch-omega-seamaster-30-st-125-0007

https://www.omegawatches.com/en-us/customer-service/certificates-and-extracts

https://www.omegawatches.com/en-us/vintage-watches

 

Thanks alot, this is great info! I didn't know that the dial had been changed in such a way but to know that I purchased at around about the correct price point and to gain the education out of it i'm happy with what i brought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, HSL said:

Nice watch and the price is like spot on as OldHippo suggests
A quick check shows

Cal 269 = OK
21117988 = 1963 = OK
125.007 - 63 = OK

But the dial, on this one someone probably been a little bit creative.
 

OldHippo?:D

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
×
×
  • Create New...