Jump to content

recognise sign


Recommended Posts

Hi does any one know who this mark is for . i know AS is schild but cannot find ASAT see pics.

Its a oris and under the mark its got 1950/51.

I am trying to find the lift angle to time it. before i strip it.

thanks

gary

IMG_20200405_153230.jpg

IMG_20200405_153229.jpg

IMG_20200405_153217.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yer

No cal number just. This as at in a cloud. 

It's not in the bestfit books I have searched. 

And if it is the one jberry says I'm in trouble cos it keeps great time but if I put it on timer machine it's minus 359 with lift angle set at 52 deg. 

Most Oris are 38 deg to 44 deg. 

So l am still confused. 

Cheers

Gary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, gary17 said:

Yer

No cal number just. This as at in a cloud. 

It's not in the bestfit books I have searched. 

And if it is the one jberry says I'm in trouble cos it keeps great time but if I put it on timer machine it's minus 359 with lift angle set at 52 deg. 

Most Oris are 38 deg to 44 deg. 

So l am still confused. 

Cheers

Gary

In the third pic, it looks like there's a number under the symbol ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, gary17 said:

Yer it's not a in house Oris I am sure as says schilf but no asat

As @JBerry states above, the ST stands for 'Standard'.

It's an AS 1950/51 movement. I have the same movement in a Royce watch.

The lift angle is 52 degs

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • people be honest.... Swatch is evil for the watchmakers and repairers, BUT not everything in watches from Switzerland is from the Swatch-Group. As far as i know, Selitta got sacked by Swatch as a Movement-Assembler for them and they started to produce Movements in their own Name with slight Modifications. As far as i know, they sell Parts to the Market for their Movements. In most cases, if a ETA-Movement fails, it is a valid Option to replace it with a Selitta Movement, which i consider the Solution for this Mess with the Swatch-Group...... I have no Connection to anybody at Selitta, but being a Swiss-Guy, i still like to have Swiss-Made Watches, but not from the Swatch-Group.   ok ? regards, Ernst
    • Just one more greedy act by Swatch. They started a number of years ago here in the US..cutting off supplies to watchmakers that could build complications that many Swatch houses couldn't even touch. Old school masters who had gone through some of the most prestigious houses in the world. Otto Frei has some statements on their page about it. I tell all my customers to avoid new Swiss watches like the plague,..unless they just want an older one in their collection that still has some parts out on the market, or they have really deep pockets and don't mind waiting months and paying through the nose to get it back. Plenty of others to choose from..IE Seiko,..or other non-swiss brands Even a number of Chinese brands are catching up with the Swiss,..and I think that in time, their actions will be their downfall
    • Yes. If that's not what you are experiencing...start looking for something rubbing. A 1st guess is that one of the hands is rubbing against the hole in the center of the dial. Especially if you now have lower amplitude in face up/ face down positions.
    • Once a movement has the dial and hands put back and it is recased, would you expect the assembled watch to have the same amplitude as when the movement is in a movement holder and is without hands and dial? Thanks
    • C07641+ not sure what the "+" is for after the last digit.
×
×
  • Create New...