Jump to content

recognise sign


Recommended Posts

Hi does any one know who this mark is for . i know AS is schild but cannot find ASAT see pics.

Its a oris and under the mark its got 1950/51.

I am trying to find the lift angle to time it. before i strip it.

thanks

gary

IMG_20200405_153230.jpg

IMG_20200405_153229.jpg

IMG_20200405_153217.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yer

No cal number just. This as at in a cloud. 

It's not in the bestfit books I have searched. 

And if it is the one jberry says I'm in trouble cos it keeps great time but if I put it on timer machine it's minus 359 with lift angle set at 52 deg. 

Most Oris are 38 deg to 44 deg. 

So l am still confused. 

Cheers

Gary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, gary17 said:

Yer

No cal number just. This as at in a cloud. 

It's not in the bestfit books I have searched. 

And if it is the one jberry says I'm in trouble cos it keeps great time but if I put it on timer machine it's minus 359 with lift angle set at 52 deg. 

Most Oris are 38 deg to 44 deg. 

So l am still confused. 

Cheers

Gary

In the third pic, it looks like there's a number under the symbol ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, gary17 said:

Yer it's not a in house Oris I am sure as says schilf but no asat

As @JBerry states above, the ST stands for 'Standard'.

It's an AS 1950/51 movement. I have the same movement in a Royce watch.

The lift angle is 52 degs

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • glad it worked out, those ESA movements are obsolete but new old stock is still out there, now that you know the make/model you could also do a cross reference to see if something more current would line up with the dial feet and hands...for future use if needed 👍
    • I wish they would have done so in this case. The whole story went like this: I sent my speedmaster to an omega service center about 10 years ago (at that point of time I haven't even started watchmaking). After the watch came back to me it had only about 6 months wristtime until january 2024 (not fair for this nice watch but the other pieces of my collection want wristtime too 🙂). So my conclusion is that the barrel was already faulty when it came back from service, can't imagine that amount of wear in 6 months wristtime. In january 2024 the performance on the wrist was quite bad, so I decided to have a look by myself. I have to admit that I didn't check the barrel close enough as I thought it must be ok, couldn't have issues after official omega service. That was a mistake, I will learn from that. Follow the golden rule: Nothing is certain except death and taxes.
    • I am same as you oldhippy I won’t touch anything with a battery, I keep getting requests to but I just say I only do mechanical clocks, there are quite a few errors & omissions with the repair guide have a look at this. https://mb.nawcc.org/wiki/Encyclopedia-Subjects/Torsion-Clocks/Book:Horolovar-400-Day-Clock-Repair-Guide-10th-Edition-Errors-and-Updates
    • Nice experiment. As it will be no problem, please put a twice less mass (half of the two penies) and read the amplitude, will be interesting. I mean to determine what is the relation torque/amplitude.
    • parts touching that aren't supposed to touch definitely would cause an issue. there not supposed to be touching there supposed to be independent which means that @VWatchie is correct that the ratchet wheel has no effect on performance. so if the ratchet wheel in your particular case is touching that is definitely going to be an issue and needs to be addressed. did you know that the Swatch group service centers do not change mainsprings? Swatch group service centers have an infinite supply of spare parts so they just change the mainspring barrel the whole thing. Plus anything else the watchmaker doesn't like just gets replaced like anything related to the escapement they just replace the components because they can.
×
×
  • Create New...