Jump to content

Wristwatch Screw Case Remover - Any Suggestions?


Recommended Posts

I'm always reluctant to snap off the back off a wristwatch because I don't have a press for closing up - and Im' afraid I might crack the crystal. However, one or two of my watches have screw cases so I'm tempted to buy a reasonably priced case remover. Any suggestions on what to buy?

 

(I don't have that problem with pocket watches, by the way, because all mine can be unscrewed by hand or just have dust covers that hinge and snap open).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will,

 

I would be very careful when it comes to the really cheap Jaxa style case openers, the cheap ones are cheap for a reason.

I had a couple in the past and found that the pins tend not to be really rigidly mounted in the frame. They seem ok to start with but when you start to apply a reasonably amount of torque they flex just enough to allow the pins to slip out. The pins will then skate across the case back leaving a trail of scratches as witness. You may be lucky and get one that doesn't do this, but it will be just luck.

 

At the silly end of the scale Bergeon do a Jaxa style wrench for about £200, but a much more sensible option is the LG Master wrench for about £70. To me the extra £65 or so pays for keeping a pristine case pristine. Try costing up the repair of a deep score in the gold medallion on the back of a vintage Omega Constellation for instance.

 

Alternatively (and my "go to" option), is the rubber ball case back opener, have a look at this;

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Watch-Opener-Screw-Remover-Opening/dp/B00CFG0P3Y/ref=sr_1_26?ie=UTF8&qid=1391613576&sr=8-26&keywords=watch+back+case+opener

There are many variation on the same theme, surprisingly effective for all but the most stubborn case backs, dirt cheap, and no damage to the watch.

When this fails though I do reach for the LG Master.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I appreciate your advice, Marc. I have to say that I really only need this to look at the movements mainly in pretty old, medium-range wristwatches - and only then occasionally, because the basic purpose is to photograph them. If I was a serious tinkerer - and you sound far more sophisticated than a serious tinkerer - then I'd probably go upmarket! As it is, I'll probably make do and mend. My really seriously expensive watches are mainly all screw-back pocket watches - no problems there!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the subject of tools, it's always worth keeping a look out for decent stuff second hand.

 

Having made do with cheap screwdrivers and tweezers for far too long I eventually managed to pull together a useful set of Bergeon screwdrivers and Dumont tweezers for a fraction of the new cost. I had to do a little fettling to bring them back to top notch condition but then I like that, it helps me to get to know the tools properly.

 

My bestest ever score though is my Wild Heergrugg M5 stereo binocular microscope. Proper stereo magnification from 6X to 62.5X in 8 steps, with 9.5cm working distance between the object lens and subject. All for just £20 at a car boot sale. Luvley Jubley ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had some of those cheaper case balls in (with strange pictures of sheep on?). They were rubbish compared to the blue ones so we ended up giving them away. The blue ones are still under a fiver so quite cheap. I agree with the jaxa tool comments. The Indian and Chinese cheaper ones are not comparable to the Bergeon one but if you are opening less than 10 watches a year and they are not high value then they are good enough. Screw backs are relatively easy with the right tool. The worst are clip on backs of cheap fashion watches with thin domed or shaped glasses. The cheaper the watch the worse the case seems to be and getting the back on can be tricky. Personally I hate the modaine quartz watches. Cheapest eta quartz movement available inside and a badly made case. They have a very thin rim to push against (glass side) when pressing the back on, and a thin domed glass. I haven't cracked one yet but it still worries me every time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

post-31-0-43550900-1391703155_thumb.jpg

I appreciate your advice, Marc. I have to say that I really only need this to look at the movements mainly in pretty old, medium-range wristwatches - and only then occasionally, because the basic purpose is to photograph them. If I was a serious tinkerer - and you sound far more sophisticated than a serious tinkerer - then I'd probably go upmarket! As it is, I'll probably make do and mend. My really seriously expensive watches are mainly all screw-back pocket watches - no problems there!

Hi Will,

 

I bought this kit of tools some time ago when I started opening up watches, it cost around £25 - £30 on ebay, it's obvously made in China or India as the quality on some of the jaxa bits is a bit doubtful and I wouldn't use it on a very tight back or on an expensive watch but I've found it to be a good starter kit that you can add to with more expensive tools as you go along and if watch repairing is not your thing then you haven't wasted a lot of money.

 

Phil. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have used the budget Jaxa for sometime now, OK so far and has opened some mig welded case backs without incident. Have a similar press to Craig's but the dies don't have the brass insert and have begun to strip the threads, also the threaded shaft on mine protruded from the die and cracked a crystal, have now resolved by spacing with a penny washer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the cheap Chinese case opener came today, so I got the back off the Caravelle to photograph the movement. Worked fine - luckily it wasn't locked tight on - and it worked fine with the tightening as well. One small step for mankind...

Edited by WillFly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...
Marc, on 06 Feb 2014 - 01:18 AM, said:

Will,

 

I would be very careful when it comes to the really cheap Jaxa style case openers, the cheap ones are cheap for a reason.

 

I totally agree Marc.

The case opener I use for screw casebacks is the "T" shaped one from Horotec. 

It adjusts quickly and is worth every penny.

Also as Mark suggested, a case vise is absolutely necessary not only to protect your hands; but to ensure the least possibility of slipping and damaging the caseback.

 

post-246-0-60738500-1422075709.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The case clamp has a stepped bottom which I use to clamp it into a small bench vice (fixed to workbench) for really stubborn backs. 

This gives you 2 free hands to work the Jaxa opener, and you can press down hard to avoid slipping out of caseback.

Fit the case and close the case vice first as it won't move once clamped in bench vice!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 years later...

Hello @atimegoneby

Beware excessive twisting on those little tiny heads that are likely NOT that high-quality metal in those all-in-one kits. 

Using one of them (a long time ago, when I first started out) I had the pins shear off, which is a drag as the failure cause a MASSIVE SCRATCH in the case involved.

In the beginning, I was able to struggle along, but now I am actively replacing that kit with higher grade stuff where it matters most.

g.
----

Edited by Gramham
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is a very sad day for the industry.. For most of us being amateurs the cost of replacing parts for ETA,s etc will be beyond affordability for the customers.   see full statement below   We have now received the decision from Judge Michael Green on whether or not the High Court has jurisdiction to hear our claim against Swatch, and sadly it is not the decision we had hoped for.   As we have pointed out in previous news items (see below),the rules that Judge Green had to apply strictly prevented him from examining in any way how the Swiss Court arrived at its verdict, even if it is blatantly obvious that the verdict is wrong.   As Swatch’s lawyer was summing up in the last few minutes oft he hearing, the Judge twice pinned him asking if it was alright if, as a result of the Swiss verdict, consumers had to pay 50% more for their watch repairs. After some stumbling, their lawyer’s reply was “Yes”, so  I am quite sure that Judge Green left his court fully aware that the Swiss verdict does not reflect the norms of British Competition Law. However, the rules simply do not allow him to take that simple fact into account.   Judge Green noted that our two arguments relating firstly to British Competition Law now being different from that of the EU, and secondly to the contention that the legality of the Authorised Service Networks has not been tested, had both been mentioned in the Swiss verdict. Because they had been mentioned, he felt that to allow us to argue them again would constitute re examining the Swiss case, and could not be allowed.   As to our claim that we were denied our right to be heard because our evidence was not considered, our lawyers had argued that the evidence we provided could not have been looked at because had the Swiss Court done so, it could not have reached the conclusion that it did. In his verdict, Judge Green highlighted general statements in the Swiss verdict that evidence had been looked at, and acknowledged the arguments we made to him, but again he considered that this was re-examining the Swiss verdict, and could not be permitted.   Our case has attracted considerable interest within the Legal community, and within minutes of the decision being made public we were approached for comment by one of the largest subscription news services, Global Competition Review. They asked us two very pertinent questions, and I reproduce them for you below along with our responses, as they neatly summarise the consequences arising from our case.   What are the key takeaways?   Enormous damage has been done to the fundamentals of UK and European Competition Law by the Swiss courts. It has always been the case that the effect on consumers and competition has to be considered in any decision making, but we now have a ruling that states even monopolists can remove wholesale markets from the supply chain without any consumer benefit based justification. Those entities looking to subvert Competition Law and exploit consumers for their own benefit will be looking at this very carefully.   Has the court made the wrong decision? If so, will you appeal?   The issue lies not with the High Court, but rather with cross border jurisdiction treaties that have no requirement in them for foreign jurisdictions applying UK law to take account of the Ratio Legis [a legal term for the fundamental reasoning why the law was written] of that law, and have no remedy within them for UK Courts to overcome decisions that clearly do not.    After eight years of work, and a very considerable sum in legal costs, I can not begin to tell you how disappointed I am at this outcome. For the time being, there is no further route through the British Courts that Cousins can follow. However, I promised that we would fight to the end, and that promise stands.   The UK is no longer part of the Lugano Convention, whose rules Judge Green has applied, and as yet nothing permanent has replaced it. The political tide turned against repair prevention by restricting supply of spare parts some time ago, and our efforts on behalf of the Watch Repair industry have resulted in high level contacts within several Government Departments. You can be sure that we will keep working to overcome this unjust situation that we now all find ourselves in.    I will keep you advised.   Kind regards   Anthony
    • Dell fancy a challenge🤣   https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/285785684626?itmmeta=01HT29WVJY21Q94C73GYHGBTFX&hash=item428a277a92:g:15YAAOSwNRVmBAUz&itmprp=enc%3AAQAJAAAA0DIe4QLQBW66rSyIMiyBuk8GY%2B86pQ%2BQnxGbcNq7egAGe5DIs9YMmiWJIbZtMSxwNJIiJxuojbq523IeUSBQ6pJEIQ0tfz2ChrBR03BksmKINyklg1IK4GAfAcYY9Hta9wVeSZSZN7ZCNAfZTgKs9c4%2BUIUZ3Qjc3QjUXDn2uPRo1FiYOEewMG5A26EXb%2BclBgrqtbOmM6P3bea%2F8ZImOAXNI1HtbmtMk84pIGoM6ISwaM1PKFuADtTFMccS5e3ZjndCbXYXHrW3CecsV0edw3M%3D|tkp%3ABk9SR8q588nQYw Darwin’s theory of evolution has not been proven to be absolutely.  😀 
    • A already know the size movement I have the problem is the dial a had purchased has a dimension 20.6mm wide a want to find a watch case that going to fit the dial perfectly 
    • Hi.  I would like to take issue here regarding battery driven , watches, clocks,etc. I will and do repair these clocks in fact I have sever al in my collection as well as the regular mechanical ones. I have one on my mantle piece over 60 years old tha belonged to my wife’s Aunt,  long gone Iam afraid and it has been cleaned etc and never missed a beat and is accurate. Every one has their preduices as regards Electrical /electronic Horology but I regard it as part of the progress time line of the art of Horology and to be treated as such. Like Darwin’s theory of evolution it evolved.  Two cavemen knocking rocks together and a shard broke off , looking at it he worked out if it was stuck on the end of a stick he would have a spear. Likewise his pal seeing what he was up to picked up a piece  and did the same, now that’s evolution. Some clockmaker decided to build a clock that ran with a battery and no spring to wind up and break, progress and both the mechanical and battery driven clocks evolved, the battery ones got better to the point that if it broke you changed the complete unit. Likewise watches did the same but both can be repaired by people who approach Horology with an open mind without preduice.  We all have our likes and dislikes bu I for one would never dismiss any technology because I don’t like it.   The mobile phone is a good example of modern technology at work as is the automotive industry. There buttons and switches in my car I don’t use because to me they are not nesessary but I still drive the car.
    • I haven't gone through all the reading of what it might be or not. The first thing I would do if nothing obvious stands out is replace the mainspring, you have to start at the source of the power. Nine times out of ten that is the problem.  
×
×
  • Create New...