Jump to content

Polishing off worn gold plating


Recommended Posts

Greetings -- I'm a new member seeking some advice regarding the case of my Tudor 7206/1, circa 1969 based on serial number.

This watch has a gold plated stainless steel case. At the time I got it, the plating was worn through in a few places - and it is especially worn now.
I'm hoping someone might be able to recommend a service facility that could remove the remaining plating, and lightly polish up the underlying steel.

I've seen several examples (both on watch forums and pieces listed on eBay, etc) that lead me to believe it is possible, but my local watchmaker did not want to do it - and I'm having trouble locating one that can. Perhaps it is a better question for a jeweler, but here is an exact example of what I am hoping to do (had the owner of this watch been the US, I would have asked him who did the work): https://forums.watchuseek.com/f2/how-difficult-remove-gold-plating-case-4182170-2.html

Thanks in advance for any assistance you can provide.

20200317_155713.jpg

20200317_155750.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally  I would wear it as is. not knowing  what the plating is composed of I am a bit shy to tell you what to do. But if I were bound and determined   to remove the plating. I would remove  the movement  and crystal  and try metal polish and a cotton  rag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This may be of no concern to you, but, if you remove the plating, you destroy the value and the history of the watch.  I think it is beautiful just the way it is.  You could always polish a bit by hand with Cape Cod Colth if you want, but short of replating the case, I would take no actions to harm the plating.  Replating may well diminish the value as well.  Good luck,


RMD

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Polishing to almost perfection is relatively easy, but what value would the watch have then?
I think that the value of the watch warrants exploring the chances of replating by a reputable professional.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You should definitely preserve the patina of this fine watch. If needed, clean it up and polish it ever so gently not to remove any of the plating. In my book, your watch looks a million times better than the watch where the plating was removed. If you want a SS watch I recommend you make a supplementary purchase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tha market tells us that a used gold plated Tudor is less valuable that a Stainless Steel model. There would be no loss of value, rather the contrary. A jeweller would remove the plating with an Aluminium Oxide mop and then repolish in the usual way. This would enhance its value. The case without movement and crystal should be offered to a jeweller with the proviso to remove only the minimum of material.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Watcher said:

Tha market tells us that a used gold plated Tudor is less valuable that a Stainless Steel model. There would be no loss of value, rather the contrary. A jeweller would remove the plating with an Aluminium Oxide mop and then repolish in the usual way. This would enhance its value. The case without movement and crystal should be offered to a jeweller with the proviso to remove only the minimum of material.

That surely applies to 'original' watches? ..............A 'stainless' one with what is obviously hands and dial (and possibly crown) from a GP one is very non original.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Watcher said:

Tha market tells us that a used gold plated Tudor is less valuable that a Stainless Steel model.

No problem if the watch is intended to be worn, but if it had to be sold then an expert collector or appraiser would probably be able to tell the watch has been polished and changed from the original, and raise issue before of after the transaction. I don't know if there are stamps anywhere to this effect. Collectors consider any polishing  an offense to their orthodox approach.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
×
×
  • Create New...