Jump to content

Rack and snail clock


Willow

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone hope you are all keeping well, i purchased a mantel clock but it only has made in England stamped on it, i understand it was made for a store called Dubros, i believe Smith's made them for this store.The problem i am having is it's a Rake and Snail and was wondering if the cam that lifts the rack comes off or is it only certain clocks that do this. I have sent some photo's if they help.

Thanks Willow

IMG_20200330_133834931_HDR.jpg

IMG_20200330_133909687_HDR.jpg

IMG_20200330_134029177_HDR.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you both for quick response, I did try and lever it off with a screwdriver but it would not budge, and I was concerned I might damage it by using to much force, I will give it another go tomorrow now I know it should come off, cheers Willow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi sorry to trouble you again before i try and put a bit more force just want to make sure i explained myself right, the part i am trying to take of is just below the snail i know the one near the top with a pin on is called a gathering pallet is the one below the snail also called the gathering pallet which is on the hour hand.

Thanks Willow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As said above, these can be a really tight fit, in some cases they are friction fitted right where they seat, on others they are tight all the way along the shaft. I use levers like in the photo (these are Bergeon, about 10" long) to unseat it, then if it's still tight I use the little puller to coax it off the rest of the way.

 

Getting it off is one thing, reseating it is another. You will need a hollow punch with a deep enough hole to pass the length of the arbor. In my case I made it, probably you can get by with a piece of brass tubing. The other issue is hand alignment after; on most clocks the hub on the minute hand can be rotated to align it with the strike, but on some there is just a square in the hand itself with no adjustment. Here you need to pay attention to the position of the cam in relation to the square so you aren't striking at 12 minutes past or something.

All that said, if it's yours and you are confident it is clean and not worn, just leave it. For a customer I will remove it no matter what.

 

In my experience wear is more likely at the pivot that carries gathering pallet, the other cam OH mentioned first. These are usually much easier to remove.

 

 

puller.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone for your input Old Hippy has informed me its called  a cam wheel for lifting the strike, i have only started clock repair and bought  a cheap one off ebay to learn, the first clock i bought the cam came of easy, but this one won't budge so decided to leave it on.       thanks again everyone. Willow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's probably a cardinal rule for watch repair to never get distracted while at the bench. Yesterday, after finishing a tricky mainspring winding/barrel insertion (I didn't have a winder and arbor that fit very well) I mentally shifted down a gear once that hurdle was passed. There were other things going on in the room as I put the barrel and cover into the barrel closer and pressed to get that satisfying snap. But when I took it out I realized I never placed the arbor.  When opening a barrel, we are relying on the arbor to transfer a concentrically-distributed force right where it is needed at the internal center of the lid. However, when that isn't present it's difficult to apply pressure or get leverage considering the recessed position of the lid, the small holes in the barrel and the presence of the mainspring coils. It was a beat-up practice movement so I didn't take a lot of time to think it over and I pushed it out using a short right-angle dental probe placed in from the bottom, but that did leave a bit of a scratch and crease in the thin lid. I had also thought about pulling it using a course-threaded screw with a minor thread diameter smaller than the lid hole and a major diameter larger, but that may have done some damage as well.  Thinking about how this might have been handled had it been a more valuable movement, is there a method using watchmaking or other tools that should extract the lid with the least damage? 
    • 🤔 what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ? Making a small groove so the lubrication doesn't spread across the component but what if when lubing a little overspills and sits on the epilame .
    • Why just the bottom mike ? Is it worth polishing the whole arm ?
    • The one thing I took time over was to round and polish the curves at the bottom of the jumper arm. The slightest mark (left over from cutting of filing) acts as a stress raiser, just where you don't need it. 
    • I printed the base and it is a bit too large to fit on the base of the hand setter. The ring bumps into the column so it is unable to full seat on the central ring. I'm going to try removing some of the materal and see if I can't get it to go down.
×
×
  • Create New...