Jump to content

H/S centering problem


Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Struggling with a h/s problem that I can’t get my head around.

 

The movement is a Tavannes 38 that belongs to an old (30’s?) art deco tank watch. I have serviced the movement and at first (well after some tinkering in the h/s area) it ran beautifully with good amplitude and nice straight lines on the timegrapher.

 

But then it started to behave weird, speeding heavily and stopping.

 

I had noticed that the first h/s turn outside the regulator runs very close to the regulator pin and this is where I had pushed and pulled a bit to get it to run free. Which apparently worked for a while....

 

Removing the h/s from the balance wheel and mounting it back on the bridge, I seem to find that the h/s (in my eyes) looks quite decent with overall evenly spaced turns etc.

 

But the collet is clearly offset and centering it will inevitably push the turns tighter and closer to the regulator pin.

 

With my limited h/s adjustment experience, I can’t see a way to move the collet to the correct position without, in some way, influencing the overall h/s shape and possibly create unwanted touching between h/s turns or the regulator pin.

 

A photo is attached. I hope it makes sense to explain my problem.

 

2bf6d476198bcaea8838c519f078cf86.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi as mentioned the B/s is not right , The spring between the regulator and the stud is a little out of concentricity,  The arc should allow the regulator to move round without touching the spring and be centered between the pins. If you move the regulator towards the stud the collet will move from the center. Ideally you want the collet centered and the reglator moving towards the stud without moving the spring..   easier said than done.  Take your time.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi and thanks for feedback.

I have tried to alter the shape from the stud towards regulator to move the collet more towards center. And as such it works...but since anything I do close to the h/s circumference also move the entire h/s and ending with that first turn outside the regulator to move against the reg pin. It’s as if I should really need to only move the collet without touching any of the other h/s turn positions. Not possible, I guess.

To me it feels like the h/s is overall a tiny bit too large diameter to fit the three points; center, regulator and stud.

Sigh....







Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, bsoderling said:

To me it feels like the h/s is overall a tiny bit too large diameter to fit the three points; center, regulator and stud.

Exactly.
If the collet is centered, the spring will touch the regulator pin. Probably this hairspring was changed in the past.

Frank

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Probably this hairspring was changed in the past.



The thought has struck me as well that this may be the case.

I will try some more, maybe there’s a compromize that works?

And I was also thinking that maybe I can find a regulator from a scrap movement with a slightly longer distance from center to reg pin that offer a tiny bit more space for the first h/s turn?

Any comments to that idea?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi again,

Running out of ideas, I decided to try a somewhat counterintuitive approach.

With the main trouble being the h/s touching the reg pin from the outside, I decided to remedy that to start.

I slightly straightened the h/s right across from the stud i.e. Moving the entire h/s in the ”wrong” direction and effectively increasing the error between collet and jewel hole.

What then happens when ”forcing” the collet to be over the jewel hole is that the hairspring gets a bit distorted with tighter turns on the regulator side.

But....the error introduced by the straightening gets spread out over many h/s turns and there’s still space between the spring and the the reg pin.

Looks a bit ugly but runs very well again and hopefully interesting for some h/s nerds out there.






Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OK, welcome in the world of alarm clocks... I guess the 4th wheel is dished because it is from another movement. If it was not dishet, then it would not mesh with the pinion of the escape wheel, am I right? The marks of wear on the 4th wheel pinion doesn't corespond to the 3th wheel table position, at list this is what i see on the picts. Calculating the rate is easy - there is a formula - BR = T2 x T3 x T4 x T5 x 2 /(P3 x P4 x P5) where T2 - T5 are the counts of the teeth of the wheels tables, and P3 - P5 are the counts of the pinion leaves. Vibrating the balance is easy - grasp for the hairspring where it should stay in the regulator with tweasers, let the balance hang on the hairspring while the downside staff tip rests on glass surface. Then make the balance oscillate and use timer to measure the time for let say 50 oscillations, or count the oscillations for let say 30 seconds. You must do the free oscillations test to check the balance staff tips and the cone cup bearings for wear. This kind of staffs wear and need resharpening to restore the normal function of the balance.
    • Glue a nut to the barrel lid, insert a bolt, pull, disolve the glue.  Maybe someone will have a better answer. 
    • The stress is the force (on the spring) x distance. The maximum stress is at the bottom, and decreases up the arm. That's why they always break at the bottom. I used a round file, then something like 2000 grit to finish. I gave the rest of the arm a quick polish - no need for a perfect finish. Just make sure there are no 'notches' left from cutting/filing. The notches act like the perforations in your toilet paper 🤣
    • It's probably a cardinal rule for watch repair to never get distracted while at the bench. Yesterday, after finishing a tricky mainspring winding/barrel insertion (I didn't have a winder and arbor that fit very well) I mentally shifted down a gear once that hurdle was passed. There were other things going on in the room as I put the barrel and cover into the barrel closer and pressed to get that satisfying snap. But when I took it out I realized I never placed the arbor.  When opening a barrel, we are relying on the arbor to transfer a concentrically-distributed force right where it is needed at the internal center of the lid. However, when that isn't present it's difficult to apply pressure or get leverage considering the recessed position of the lid, the small holes in the barrel and the presence of the mainspring coils. It was a beat-up practice movement so I didn't take a lot of time to think it over and I pushed it out using a short right-angle dental probe placed in from the bottom, but that did leave a bit of a scratch and crease in the thin lid. I had also thought about pulling it using a course-threaded screw with a minor thread diameter smaller than the lid hole and a major diameter larger, but that may have done some damage as well.  Thinking about how this might have been handled had it been a more valuable movement, is there a method using watchmaking or other tools that should extract the lid with the least damage? 
    • 🤔 what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ? Making a small groove so the lubrication doesn't spread across the component but what if when lubing a little overspills and sits on the epilame .
×
×
  • Create New...