Jump to content

Latest job on the bench


watchweasol

Recommended Posts

Hi Chaps  just picked up this as a repair job, Not a restoration client just wants all the bruises amd marks leaving as its its life story. This clock has been well traveled and as such and its advanced years isnt too bad. Got some research to do then get cracking 

DSCF3309.JPG

DSCF3310.JPG

DSCF3311.JPG

DSCF3298.JPG

DSCF3299.JPG

DSCF3300.JPG

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi  further research reveals its a blackforest (Deutsche clock)  around the 1700s  the going and strike trains are in tandem and not side by side as conventional clocks.. the timber id as dry as dust so will need the linseed oil treatment to breath some life into it, looking forward to doing it I guess it will take a couple of months  to get done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As you say, an interesting project...surprised at the 1700's date though, thought it more likely to be one of the 19thC postman alarms. I suspect that the chime on top is not original but an addition to replace a bell. How is the arm set? usually there is an embossed brass disk behind the hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi The date is a rough guesstimate taken from F.W.Brittan's book of antique clocks, as it happens I have another one of the same era and that has a bell.  There does not seem to be an alarm on either of them. The state its in is as i picked it up all in bits in a box. More work to do and more research.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, watchweasol said:

Hi The date is a rough guesstimate taken from F.W.Brittan's book of antique clocks, as it happens I have another one of the same era and that has a bell.  There does not seem to be an alarm on either of them. The state its in is as i picked it up all in bits in a box. More work to do and more research.

If it has two chain/weight assemblies then it would likely be an alarm movement, I had a very fine working one like this some 50 years ago, dated to around 1840, (when the alarm went off I suspect the whole bloody street heard it :D) sadly lost in a divorce:unsure:.... A single weight chain would just suggest a chime but more complexity of the movement would be expected if it were to chime the hour numbers.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi  The deeper I dig the more confused I have become, There appears to be at lease seven different varaieties of this type of clock, and just as many varieties of how it recieved its name. The continental view is  that is was named "postmans clock" because the Ostler  (stable hand had to have his masters horse at the POST at a given time hence the name. They were made from around 1700s up to 1920 the later ones having a metal dial the earlier ones wooden, some were painted some were not some had a glass front some did not. The consensus of opinion is as varied as the clocks.  The one I have got has a striking In tandem with the going  train, The dial is wood plain white and roman numerals  and I guess from the 1800s .   I shall just repair the clock and worry about it origin later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi  The clock has been dismantled and the wood work treated with boiled linseed oil to feed it all the gear work has been hand cleaned and is now back together just running the time train for a few days. The chains are black and I have one soaking  now to see what happens,  more to do.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is known as a wag on the Wall clock. Could be English, not a postmans clock, they tended to have the alarm setting in the middle of the dial. Normally fitted with a bell and not a gong. Many don't even have a bezel. Cant see the pendulum, but i expect the shaft to be very long with a small bob.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Old Hippy   right on the money  Further research into these clocks and I came up with just that Information "Wag On Th e Wall" clock no Alarm . The pendulum is approx three feet long and a small brass disc bob.   Its back together now chains and all but no dial as it was cracked (wood) and the surround also wood needs quite a bit of attention, brass bezel and no glass. The glass is held in by brass pins through the bezel edge. A bit crude but thats how it is and I go with that.    The pictures below are the chains before and after all that was used to clean them was a two hour soak in vinegar and a good scrub with a brass brush.

DSCF3322.JPG

DSCF3323.JPG

DSCF3324.JPG

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • just one little minor reminder here this isn't your normal balance wheel.  pages 17 and 18 are what you really want to be looking at. normally studs don't turn but this watch has the etachron system designed for lots of adjustment. Personally I would try to rotate the stud back to where it's supposed to be. If you're lucky you didn't actually bend it at the stud it just looks really bad as the stud has been rotated grossly out of position.. I think things will look a lot better if you put the hairspring back where it's supposed to be by rotating the stud. it's hard to tell if you actually did bend it at the stud or not we won't know until you rotate the stud back more or less where it's supposed to be. Then you want to pay attention to the manual of how to put the hairspring back in the regulator pins because yes they rotate also and they rotated specific directions otherwise bad things will happen to your hairspring. so initially you can open up the regulator as wide as it can go and don't worry about closing it until thing everything is right then you can close them a little bit
    • I need to see photos of the whole movement before I comment. 
    • Hi @Jon, so, from one extreme to another the beat error is 0.1(min.pos) to 0.2(msx.pos), and as you mentioned the rate does up and down dramatically. Also checked the position of the collet, and the collet is not central to the jewel on the balance cock. Balance moves freely, per my understanding.   So, after 24h the ampl. fell down by approx 20 deg, which I would assume is expected. After adjusting the endshake I believe I gained around +10 deg. of balance movement. Which is great, and overall the balance is not at 220'ish deg.   What I did next, some might think is non-orthodox, but was wort a try. I too the mainspring out, checked again for endshake and if the pin moves freely, and cleaned everything. Usually when installing the mainspring I would use some barrel grease on the barrel walls, install the spring and put a 2-3 drops of D-5 oil on top of the wounded spring and in the places where the arbor sits. This time I took the spring and applied a ultra this coat of Molykote Dx paste on the whole spring, before installing it in to the barrel, and added some oil to the arbor as usual.  The result improved, at a full wound the balance produces about 230-237 deg. @JohnR725 I'm getting closer to 300 😃   What I am noticing, there is a fluctuation in amplitude. With time it would rise and drop about total 8-10 deg in an interval about 2 minutes. I assumed this ruled out the power transfer from the barrel itself. So I took the gear train out, cleaned and lubed. 
    • Thank you so much, Hector and CJ. I appreciate the tech sheet and the video. Gasp, I think I will make the attempt. What's the worst that can happen? I think there may be a new balance complete in my future, though.  I'll update the post and let you know the result. R, Frank  
    • So here is the new base (v 2.1), I made it so that the base will fit over and swallow the stump of the hand pusher tool (or at least my clone of the tool), I also reduced the OD of the bottom skirt a little as it looked/felt a little large, here are a few pictures and the fake .pdf file which you need to convert to .zip once downloaded.   The cut-out seen on the below image on the bottom of the base should swallow the OD (40 mm, +0.1 mm tolerance) of the stump and the height of the stump 9.5mm (measured to 9.1mm, but rounded to 9.5mm) - let me know if this works for your tool.   Note, I think you may need to print supports for the new internal shelf created? Here is the fake .pdf for just the FreeCAD base file and 3mf files Modular Movement Holder.pdf Here is the fake pdf for complete set of the new base and ring FreeCAD/3mf files: Modular Movement Holder base and ring v 2.1.pdf However, I'm wondering how often you could use this feature, adding the dial usually increases the OD of the movement, so you would need a new (larger) adapter ring tuned to the OD of the dial and I wouldn't like to grip the dial in any kind of movement holder if It could be avoided for fear of damaging it. Maybe I'm misunderstanding you?
×
×
  • Create New...