Jump to content

rotor compatibility 2824 to sw200?


Recommended Posts

Is the rotor of a 2824 movement compatible with an sw200? I see gold after market rotors on ebay and other sites for 2824 but my watch runs an sw200. Some says sw200 is a clone of 2824 and parts are interchangeable and some state no. Does anyone know definitively regarding the rotor? Thanx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Winstriumphs said:

I see gold after market rotors on ebay and other sites for 2824 but my watch runs an sw200. 

I think you understand that there is no gold in these, but a plating of similar color?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Winstriumphs said:

I would like to find a real gold one.

Really. I could not weigh it precisely but a standard 2824 weight is approx. 2.5g with the bearing. And I don't know what alloy it is made of, but a density of 9 kg/dm3 shouldn't be far off. Gold is 19.25, so it would need about 4g, at today prices that is about 200 USD. Plus very optimistically the same would go the specialist which makes this as an one-off, there you have an 400 USD upgrade for your Invicta watch. In my opinion there are better way to spend that money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jdm said:

Really. I could not weigh it precisely but a standard 2824 weight is approx. 2.5g with the bearing. And I don't know what alloy it is made of, but a density of 9 kg/dm3 shouldn't be far off. Gold is 19.25, so it would need about 4g, at today prices that is about 200 USD. Plus very optimistically the same would go the specialist which makes this as an one-off, there you have an 400 USD upgrade for your Invicta watch. In my opinion there are better way to spend that money.

My goal originally was to drop one of the gold color rotors for a 2824 into my sw200 Invicta. A modest upgrade. Then later I got the idea to build a Submariner 16610 with upgraded lume to blue Chromalite sapphire case back and real gold rotor. Submariner in red. A prototype with some of the finest submariner features fit together into one watch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CaptCalvin said:

Yeah not very realistic at all. I can guarantee you no solid gold 2824 rotors exist. Also you ain't gettin' any chromalight. Not without some connections in Rolex.

I can obtain bgw9 lume they sell it online. There is notilumnia blue as well both almost identical in quality to Chromalite. The rotor idea was gold plated 18 or 24k. My idea was to buy the 16610 parts mostly original though a few after market maybe could be swapped. I would find a used worn dial and have that refinished to new but with bgw9 lume job and Submariner in red. Gold plate the rotor, wherever they would do that, and add the sapphire caseback. Voila. I have to find affordable parts and a place to plate the rotor. Thoughest part might be luming the pip on the bezel with the blue lume. Dont know if a ceramic insert exists for the watch but aluminum would be fine if it was original. The goal is NOT a fake Rolex but an inspired prototype homage not for sale but personal use. 

Edited by Winstriumphs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are very unlikely to find just bare chronometer movements to buy unless they've been taken out of a watch, and there is a reason why these might be taken out to be sold. Why does the chronometer certification mean so much to you? It's nothing more than a marketing gimmick these days. If it's just for yourself wouldn't it be enough for you to know that your movement is just as accurate as a chronometer rated watch? COSC has what I consider to be rather relaxed requirements for granting the chronometer certification. Most ETA  movements can achieve the COSC standard for chronometers with a little bit of regulation. 

Edited by CaptCalvin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/28/2020 at 12:05 AM, CaptCalvin said:

You are very unlikely to find just bare chronometer movements to buy unless they've been taken out of a watch, and there is a reason why these might be taken out to be sold. Why does the chronometer certification mean so much to you? It's nothing more than a marketing gimmick these days. If it's just for yourself wouldn't it be enough for you to know that your movement is just as accurate as a chronometer rated watch? COSC has what I consider to be rather relaxed requirements for granting the chronometer certification. Most ETA  movements can achieve the COSC standard for chronometers with a little bit of regulation. 

Where can a watch be sent orther than COSC to obtain a -2 to 2 sec per day standard? Who will test and work on the watch to obtain that standard?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A watchmaker makes a movement or accurizes an existing movement, then it's sent to whichever organization to get tested. If it gets past all the tests they stamp their seal of approval on it and it officially becomes a chronometer. Only Rolex observes a -2/+2 standard(superlative chronometer) as far as I'm aware and don't expect them to put the "superlative chronometer" lable an any watch other than their own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • in general this shouldn't be any change. but in general questions like this it be nice to know the specifics of the watch in other words how was it performing before it was cased up and what is it doing now.
    • just as a reminder this watch is a Swatch group product. This will bring up a problem like spare parts and technical information. that I found some links to some information on when I talk about your watch and some of the technical and basically your watch is equivalent to 2834-2 for which I'm attaching the technical sheets. But equivalent does not mean exactly the same you want to do a search on the group for C07 as we discussed this watch before including the technical differences how it's supposed to be regulated and basically because it's watch group there is no parts availability. https://calibercorner.com/eta-caliber-c07-xxx/   https://www.chrono24.com/magazine/eta-movements-from-the-2824-2-to-the-powermatic-80-p_80840/ https://www.watchuseek.com/threads/h-10-movement-details.4636991/ eta CT_2834-2_FDE_481857_15.pdf
    • people be honest.... Swatch is evil for the watchmakers and repairers, BUT not everything in watches from Switzerland is from the Swatch-Group. As far as i know, Selitta got sacked by Swatch as a Movement-Assembler for them and they started to produce Movements in their own Name with slight Modifications. As far as i know, they sell Parts to the Market for their Movements. In most cases, if a ETA-Movement fails, it is a valid Option to replace it with a Selitta Movement, which i consider the Solution for this Mess with the Swatch-Group...... I have no Connection to anybody at Selitta, but being a Swiss-Guy, i still like to have Swiss-Made Watches, but not from the Swatch-Group.   ok ? regards, Ernst
    • Just one more greedy act by Swatch. They started a number of years ago here in the US..cutting off supplies to watchmakers that could build complications that many Swatch houses couldn't even touch. Old school masters who had gone through some of the most prestigious houses in the world. Otto Frei has some statements on their page about it. I tell all my customers to avoid new Swiss watches like the plague,..unless they just want an older one in their collection that still has some parts out on the market, or they have really deep pockets and don't mind waiting months and paying through the nose to get it back. Plenty of others to choose from..IE Seiko,..or other non-swiss brands Even a number of Chinese brands are catching up with the Swiss,..and I think that in time, their actions will be their downfall
    • Yes. If that's not what you are experiencing...start looking for something rubbing. A 1st guess is that one of the hands is rubbing against the hole in the center of the dial. Especially if you now have lower amplitude in face up/ face down positions.
×
×
  • Create New...