Jump to content

Missing roller jewel


Bill3

Recommended Posts

I am working on an Elgin pocket watch grade 312.  It was an estate sale purchase and was not running when purchased.  I assumed that it was not running because it was very dirty and thought cleaning would solve all the problems.  I completely disassembled it and ran it through an ultrasound cleaner and rinse. It came out bright and shiny and when I started to reassemble for the first time I saw that there was NO roller jewel!  
So, what now? Can the roller jewel be replaced by a person with very modest ability?  I am including two pictures of the balance and roller plate.  I do not see any sign of where it was attached.  
Thanks in advance for any guidance.  
Bill H.

44FAEF5D-B387-44BB-AE73-14257891DE79.jpeg

E381A02E-3FEF-406B-8F86-D1354360BE9E.jpeg

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Nucejoe said  replacing it requires some shellac and a new roller jewel, thats the simple bit  fitting it in the right position is another matter.  It has to be vertical and in the correct location to drive the pallet.   Therefor the suggestion of a new roller with jewel is the practical solution and will cause you less grief.   cheers

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your options are few I'm afraid @Bill3. Your best bet is to either acquire a complete balance with the roller table and jewel already installed, or find a donor movement with a good balance. If by chance you find just the table with a jewel, you set the jewel perpendicular to the "spokes" of the balance wheel away from the balance cock. See the image below for reference.

Waltham-Pocket-Watch-Balance-Cock-And-Wheel-12-_57.thumb.jpg.b4bf24e2cd7bc531e383113f29e302d1.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always interesting problems with old American pocket watches. Roller jewel's can fall out the entire roller table cannot. This means somebody's worked on this watch prior to you and left pieces missing.

Unlike modern watches finding replacement parts is problematic. I have a website below you can find a parts list but you'll notice even for the roller jewel a reference that the size varied. Even if you had a roller table with the jewel it might not even fit. A balance complete would be a better option but you're going to have to adjust the escapement to fit the new balance because the sizes will be a little different. Even though these are mass made watches they were still hands adjusted and had variations in size throughout their production.

 

http://www.elginwatchparts.com/

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

Always interesting problems with old American pocket watches. Roller jewel's can fall out the entire roller table cannot. This means somebody's worked on this watch prior to you and left pieces missing.

Unlike modern watches finding replacement parts is problematic. I have a website below you can find a parts list but you'll notice even for the roller jewel a reference that the size varied. Even if you had a roller table with the jewel it might not even fit. A balance complete would be a better option but you're going to have to adjust the escapement to fit the new balance because the sizes will be a little different. Even though these are mass made watches they were still hands adjusted and had variations in size throughout their production.

 

http://www.elginwatchparts.com/

Very true. However, if the OP gets a donor movement from the same series, it should in theory be a drop in item. 

The link below is for a donor movement for under $30., I recommend you contact the seller to confirm the balance is good. 

https://www.ebay.com/itm/193330534646

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is an update on my missing roller jewel.  I had already looked for the roller jewel in the rinse solution, but looked for the first time on the drying rack.  AND THERE IT WAS!  It was still mounted in the roller table.  See the picture below.  Now I have two new problems; how to make the roller table to stay on and how to orient it so that it interacts with the pallet fork in the appropriate manner.

Many thanks to all who have responded to my plea for help.  Every response was helpful.

Bill H.

 

 

F7843273-8C2B-4F63-B8A1-FAA5702CD87E.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Mobile stud carrier lets you bring the impulse jewel "in beat" . The picture FLwatchguy posted above shows impulse jewel is to make a right angle with balance spoke, ie: perpendicular to the spoke. 

You best remove the balance complete and hairspring, to put the roller on staff, need to set the wheel on anvil and tap the roller tight in place.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a very old watch, with single roller table, no mobile stud holder. Seems the jewel is happy where it is, that the roller table came off is a sign the hole is too large and yes a domed punch can close it so it frictions on well. Go slowly, when it seats on the staff with light pressure and the remaining distance to go is equal to the roller table thickness it's right, you can seat it fully.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you don't want to modify your roller table to fit the staff you could use superglue. As a wild guess that's why it fell off in the cleaning machine. Whoever staffed it before you didn't use quite the right staff and they just superglue did on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a very old watch, with single roller table, no mobile stud holder. Seems the jewel is happy where it is, that the roller table came off is a sign the hole is too large and yes a domed punch can close it so it frictions on well. Go slowly, when it seats on the staff with light pressure and the remaining distance to go is equal to the roller table thickness it's right, you can seat it fully.

And use a domed punch with a gap for the jewel.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you don't want to modify your roller table to fit the staff you could use superglue. As a wild guess that's why it fell off in the cleaning machine. Whoever staffed it before you didn't use quite the right staff and they just superglue did on.

Noooooooooop!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jdrichard said:

Noooooooooop!

If are going to get technical about it I disapprove of closing the hole in the roller table until we know why you have to close the hole. In other words if somebody has replaced the balance staff with the wrong sized staff modifying watch parts to fit that is not appropriate. So modifying parts will mean someday in the future someone might have the correct balance staff and ponder why the roller table doesn't fit. This is why superglue is harmless as you're not modifying the part. Ideally you should probably replace the balance staff with something correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, vinn3 said:

  Again, super glue raises it's ugly head !  I know of no good use for it,  if you must glue ---  use epoxy  vin

Obviously a Bit off-topic; "but as for knowing no good use for it", perhaps talk to the aviation industry ?;

"Gluing a Plane Together

It is not widely known by the general public that aircraft wings are usually glued on to the plane, not riveted, bolted, or using some other mechanical fasteners. Which means that a thin layer of polymeric material is what is holding the plane up in the sky. It's not the wing or the engine or the Bernoulli principle [1], it's the polymer adhesive."

Super glue is a classic example of a polymer adhesive. Last, after all other options failed, I had no other option than to Super-glue a chrono seconds recorder hand to it's pipe bushing ..... holds up perfectly.

I wouldn't say as a "standard" procedure, but in some case .......... :rolleyes:

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If are going to get technical about it I disapprove of closing the hole in the roller table until we know why you have to close the hole. In other words if somebody has replaced the balance staff with the wrong sized staff modifying watch parts to fit that is not appropriate. So modifying parts will mean someday in the future someone might have the correct balance staff and ponder why the roller table doesn't fit. This is why superglue is harmless as you're not modifying the part. Ideally you should probably replace the balance staff with something correct.

I would make a new balance staff


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sure that you are right, making a new balance staff is the "technically perfect" way to do this repair.  However, that is beyond my modest ability.  I have a lathe and do easy  things like repivot a clock spindal, but I have never made a balance staff.  I am leaning towards the super glue solution.  

Thanks to all who have participated in this discussion.

Bill H. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Endeavor said:

Obviously a Bit off-topic; "but as for knowing no good use for it", perhaps talk to the aviation industry ?;

"Gluing a Plane Together

It is not widely known by the general public that aircraft wings are usually glued on to the plane, not riveted, bolted, or using some other mechanical fasteners. Which means that a thin layer of polymeric material is what is holding the plane up in the sky. It's not the wing or the engine or the Bernoulli principle [1], it's the polymer adhesive."

Super glue is a classic example of a polymer adhesive. Last, after all other options failed, I had no other option than to Super-glue a chrono seconds recorder hand to it's pipe bushing ..... holds up perfectly.

I wouldn't say as a "standard" procedure, but in some case .......... :rolleyes:

  epoxy is good up to 200 deg. far.  super glue is not.   vin

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • @JohnR725 that's very helpful.  I appreciate the time you took to give those instructions and post the pictures.  below is a picture of my staff, which looks identical to the ones you posted.  The approx measurements I got are: .772 on the left part of the staff; .715 on the right side of the hub; the hub is 1.107; and the overall length (minus the broken pivot) is 5.248; which seem to line up with the measurements you posted.  I didn't think to measure the pivot, which I'll do if there's enough of one left on the staff.  Thanks again.
    • Thank you to both of you!  I've been somewhat derailed by this quandary for a couple of days now. I am guessing that the point of the wider tweezers is to support the whole spring at the same time in an effort to prevent it going under tension... I have already discovered the Zen of a clutter free space, and trying to keep my work well away from the edge, however the most terrifying of the flights wasn't so short, I had my work in the middle of the table and nothing else around.  That particular launch was towards me.  I distinctly recall feeling the spring hit my left hand as it escaped.  I only found it by dumb luck, on the floor, between the legs of my chair.  I need to order a pack of replacements just in case.  I think I recall a thread discussing where to find them, and the differences between the clones and the authentic ETA ones, pointing out that they're not interchangeable (the clones being longer IIRC).  Now I just have to find that thread again.  What I haven't mastered is the zen of the search function here.  I'm sure I"ll get that down eventually. So this is similar to, but different from one of the posts I had found in my original searches (or maybe I'm just hallucinating, I can't find the post I thought I remember).  The bits about the corner filled in a gap in what I'd read before.  At least I have a more clear picture in my head about what needs to happen now.  Yes, I've learned about how touchy these springs are.  What I'm not sure I have a good grasp on is the understanding of what causes the spring to flex, other than to say "the slightest little touch"  I think I'm going to try a small bit of Rodico to position the spring next time.
    • I think it's stamped on the inside cover. 309 I think.
    • Hi all, needing a little help. I have an old Casio AQ-321G, but have no idea what battery it takes. I've looked around online, but cannot see anything... I see a 309 stamped on the case back, could this be it....? Can you please help, below are some pictures:
    • The radial teeth are for hte seconds register, and the other (which is simple and doesn' take away significant torque from the train) for the minutes register.
×
×
  • Create New...