Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi guys and gals,In 1974 whilst visiting Italy my dad bought a new certina ds ph200 dive watch. Well he never had it serviced and wore it every day at home, work you name it he was wearing it for 46 years. I finally convinced him to let me have a look at his watch. It was gaining about a minute a day. So I placed it on the timing machine and nearly fell of the chair. There was a beat error of   . 1 and the amplitude was 215 degrees and gaining 153 seconds a day. But the screen had 2 close lines very straight and no snow to be seen indicating that it just needs a service. But when I opened the case back I was meet with the white chewing gum substance that looked like the original movement spacer which decayed over the years. I thought I would share this with you. Dad payed 24 dollars for it in 1974 brand new. Looks like I'll be working into the night. 

IMG_20200225_210514.jpg

IMG_20200225_211432.jpg

IMG_20200225_211440.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very odd to have a plastic liquefy in that manner! :wacko:Typically, plastic gets harder and brittle over time, especially when exposed to the oxygen in air. I have only ever seen plastic liquefy like that when exposed to certain solvents, even then, only certain types of plastic. I suppose it's possible someone used an adhesive of some sort to immobilize the movement in a half assed attempt to replace a lost or missing spacer prior to your fathers ownership.

Adjusted for inflation, your fathers watch cost him $131.43 in today's money. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FLwatchguy73 said:

Very odd to have a plastic liquefy in that manner! :wacko:Typically, plastic gets harder and brittle over time, especially when exposed to the oxygen in air. I have only ever seen plastic liquefy like that when exposed to certain solvents, even then, only certain types of plastic. I suppose it's possible someone used an adhesive of some sort to immobilize the movement in a half assed attempt to replace a lost or missing spacer prior to your fathers ownership.

Adjusted for inflation, your fathers watch cost him $131.43 in today's money. 

My dad bought this watch brand new in 1974 . I have read somewhere some time ago and I have seen pictures of a whitish looking movement spacer made of some type of rubber . But my research has come up empty handed . You may well be correct it makes me angry some of the things people do to get a couple of bucks ,anyway it's a mess .The watch is running ok ,I will get to it soon and maybe post the final results when Im done . This watch is super rare as they where only made between 1969 and 1975 . collectors are paying around 2000 usd for one in alright condition .Check Out this link https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Certina-DS-2-PH200M-25-651-Vintage-Automatic-mit-originaler-Box-aus-den-70ern/264505058009?hash=item3d95bae2d9:g:sQYAAOSwkfRdrHg2 and thank you for your input FLwatchguy73,  looks like some one put crap dads watch187a6b7129c76baad19272324d252b1254627278.jpg

Edited by Graziano
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, watchweasol said:

Hi   What a watch to produce those figures with all that gunge, looks like its had a varied life 46 years worth.  It will come up a treat  and ok for another 46 years.

Howdy , Yes my da was a carpenter all his life that watch never left his wrist . I will post up when I clean it up and service it and thanks for your input watchweasol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FLwatchguy73 said:

Very odd to have a plastic liquefy in that manner! :wacko:Typically, plastic gets harder and brittle over time, especially when exposed to the oxygen in air. I have only ever seen plastic liquefy like that when exposed to certain solvents, even then, only certain types of plastic. I suppose it's possible someone used an adhesive of some sort to immobilize the movement in a half assed attempt to replace a lost or missing spacer prior to your fathers ownership.

Adjusted for inflation, your fathers watch cost him $131.43 in today's money. 

It's not plastic, and it's not a simple movement spacer in the conventional sense.

The "DS" in the model name stands for "Double Security" and is Certina's approach to equipping the watch with the highest level of shock protection. In the original concept this involved isolating the movement from the case using a thick soft rubber shock absorber (think in terms of a 4mm thick soft rubber "O" ring) where you would normally find a metal or hard plastic movement spacer.

I think the issue of liquefied rubber case back gaskets is well enough known, that the same thing should happen to a soft rubber shock absorber over 46 years is no real surprise. It has made an awful mess though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I saw that in the tech sheet but I don't see how it can be adequately cleaned with the friction pinion still in place. I've accidentally pulled the arbor right out of the wheel once when I used a presto tool to try and remove it. Mark shows how he does it with the Platax tool. Those are a little too pricey for me so I got one of these from Aliexpress and I just push down on the arbor with the end of my brass tweezers. That usually gets it most of the way out and then I just grab the wheel with one hand the and the friction pinion with the other and gently rotate them until it pops off. Probably not the best way but it's seemed to work for me so far.    
    • Thanks, Jon Sounds like a plan. Obviously I'll have the face on so do you think gripping with the holder will create any problems, but I will check in the morning to see how feasible it is but I assume it only needs to be lightly held. As for holding the movement instead of the holder won't be possible in this scenario as one hand will be puling on the stem while the other pushes the spring down. That was my initial concern is how the hell can I do this with only one pair of hands. All the other times I've had to remove the stem hasn't been a problem, apart from the force required to release the stem from the setting lever, but now I need to fit the face and hands its sent me into panic mode. If it had the screw type release things would be a lot simpler but that's life 😀   Another thing I will need to consider is once the dial and hands are fitted and the movement is sitting in the case I will need to turn it over to put the case screws in. I saw a vid on Wristwatch revival where he lightly fitted the crystal and bezel so he could turn it over, is this the only option or is there another method?      
    • Hi Jon, do You think that relation spring torque - amplitude is linear? I would rather guess that the amplitude should be proportional to the square of the torque. I had once idea to check it, but still haven't.
    • I did not. I thought about it, but I had cleaned it in my ultrasonic, and the tech sheet shows lubricating it in place already assembled, so I figured discretion was the better part of valor. Although since I have to depth the jewels anyway, maybe I pull the pinion off to rule it out 100% as part of the problem. Do you know if there's a safe way to do it? I don't want to use a puller because it would push down on the plane of the wheel, and that seems like a Bad Idea. I thought about using a roller table remover, but I don't think I have a hole stake pointy enough to push it down.
    • Before putting it back in the case I would fit the hands and use a pin vice on the stem to make sure the hands were in line. 
×
×
  • Create New...