Jump to content

Barrel to right on arbor?


Stevelp

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone!  So recently after reading an article about excess friction in the barrel/arbor assembly affecting amplitude I’ve been testing the fit between the 2 without the mainspring installed.  So to test it I assemble the barrel and arbor without the mainspring installed and secure the arbor in a pin vise.  Once secured I blow the assembly with a blower.  According to the article and from what I’ve experienced the barrel should move freely on the arbor from the wind made by the blower.  I’m working on my first Omega movement, an 865 and this barrel assembly does not move freely at all.  So I’m just curious if anyone else does this, and being my first Omega I’m not sure if this is maybe normal for them?  To me it makes sense it should be fairly free to rotate.  Any thoughts on this?  And if it’s not the norm any recommendations on remedies?  I’ve seen some procedures to increase end shake with the staking set.  Any input would be greatly appreciated!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Stevelp said:

Hi everyone!  So recently after reading an article about excess friction in the barrel/arbor assembly affecting amplitude I’ve been testing the fit between the 2 without the mainspring installed.  So to test it I assemble the barrel and arbor without the mainspring installed and secure the arbor in a pin vise.  Once secured I blow the assembly with a blower.  According to the article and from what I’ve experienced the barrel should move freely on the arbor from the wind made by the blower.  I’m working on my first Omega movement, an 865 and this barrel assembly does not move freely at all.  So I’m just curious if anyone else does this, and being my first Omega I’m not sure if this is maybe normal for them?  To me it makes sense it should be fairly free to rotate.  Any thoughts on this?  And if it’s not the norm any recommendations on remedies?  I’ve seen some procedures to increase end shake with the staking set.  Any input would be greatly appreciated!

Did you properly clean/lube the arbor prior to testing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Stevelp said:

On the previous ones that I have tested I’ve always done them dry but maybe that’s something I should do with this one.

Yes you should and makes no point in doing testing on parts and movements if they haven’t been cleaned, inspected, and serviced

 

Edited by saswatch88
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never had the privilege to work on an Omega, so I can't say for sure, but why would they be different? The arbor and the spring still need room to move freely in the barrel.

Are you talking about this article:

https://adjustingvintagewatches.com/testing-mainspring-barrels/

There are some good tips in there about what the causes could be and how to remedy them. As long as you have cleaned everything thoroughly, I cannot see a problem with testing dry. Better than testing with a viscous lubricant on the parts, in my opinion.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clean the holes in the barrel and lid properly, lightly oil and test. I usually move it with my finger and see if it spins. Usually the problem is too much clearance so that the barrel rocks a bit on the arbor.

Also check the barrel installed in the movement (with or without mainspring) and see if you can rock it. Too much rock and the barrel will bind up.  Usually its because the barrel pivots are worn, there are bodges to get around this but thats another story.

Anilv

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Normally this check is done clean and dry, but clean and oiled is OK too. Ideally it should move with a blower but just moving it by hand will tell you if it's free. You need some endshake, not excessive, and as said above it shouldn't have too much "tilt", this is a sign that the holes need to be closed.

 

If holding with a pinvice you have to watch that the pinvice isn't influencing things. I prefer to capture the ends of the arbor in the flats of stout tweezers.

checking barrel arbor.JPG

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Klassiker that's my thoughts exactly thinking there should be no difference from one brand to the next.  Yes that is the exact article that I was referring too, lots of good info in there for sure!  When I am at the point of doing this test, the parts have been pegged and put through the cleaning machine and inspected so I'm fairly confident in the fact that grim would not be a contributing factor in this case.  Nickelsilver that looks to be a much better way to do the test than what I was doing, thanks for the advice!  I can rotate the barrel by hand but there is resistance when I do so.  Maybe I should assemble it the way it is and check my amplitude reading.  That way I can have a feel of what may be too much and what may be acceptable for future projects.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you have endshake? It is unlikely (essentially impossible) for the holes to become tight over time, but it is possible for the cap to sit too low in the center, zapping the endshake and causing drag.

 

If you're motivated to do it, it would be interesting to see what your amplitude is as is, then after correcting the barrel.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check the barrel on its own. If it's ok, then add the centre wheel. If those spin freely when meshed, then check that they turn smoothly when under torque by applying drag to the centre wheel while turning the barrel. If it becomes "lumpy" then you possibly have a depthing issue due to side-shake.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was home for lunch and was able to check for some end shake and I feel absolutely none.  I also tried to hold the barrel and arbor in my tweezers like you have pictured nickelsilver and I was not able to hold it tight enough to keep the barrel from turning the arbor with it.  So I would feel pretty confident that the cap may have been moved in the wrong direction. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi everyone, sorry for the silence over the last few days.  So I was finally able to sit down at the bench and spend some time with this.  I ended up adjusting the lid of the barrel and it feels much better.  Things now move freely with a puff of the blower!  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/25/2020 at 3:55 AM, Stevelp said:

Hi everyone, sorry for the silence over the last few days.  So I was finally able to sit down at the bench and spend some time with this.  I ended up adjusting the lid of the barrel and it feels much better.  Things now move freely with a puff of the blower!  

:thumbsu: Well done and thanks for starting this thread, it's been very informative!

I'm in the process of trying to figure out why a Unitas calibre 6325 of mine has too little amplitude so I'm definitely going to look into this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

So, I have now tested the "free running" of the mainspring barrel around the barrel arbor (Unitas 6325) using the techniques described in this thread, but unfortunately I'm having a hard time determining whether the "free running" is free enough or if I should or need to take some sort of action. I thought perhaps those of you following this thread might be interested in my thread (where I've also recorded a couple of videos) on this topic which stems from trying to locate the cause of a way too low amplitude. I'd really be interested in your opinions and thoughts! If so, perhaps a good starting point in my thread would be here, so hopefully I'll see you there!

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's probably a cardinal rule for watch repair to never get distracted while at the bench. Yesterday, after finishing a tricky mainspring winding/barrel insertion (I didn't have a winder and arbor that fit very well) I mentally shifted down a gear once that hurdle was passed. There were other things going on in the room as I put the barrel and cover into the barrel closer and pressed to get that satisfying snap. But when I took it out I realized I never placed the arbor.  When opening a barrel, we are relying on the arbor to transfer a concentrically-distributed force right where it is needed at the internal center of the lid. However, when that isn't present it's difficult to apply pressure or get leverage considering the recessed position of the lid, the small holes in the barrel and the presence of the mainspring coils. It was a beat-up practice movement so I didn't take a lot of time to think it over and I pushed it out using a short right-angle dental probe placed in from the bottom, but that did leave a bit of a scratch and crease in the thin lid. I had also thought about pulling it using a course-threaded screw with a minor thread diameter smaller than the lid hole and a major diameter larger, but that may have done some damage as well.  Thinking about how this might have been handled had it been a more valuable movement, is there a method using watchmaking or other tools that should extract the lid with the least damage? 
    • 🤔 what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ? Making a small groove so the lubrication doesn't spread across the component but what if when lubing a little overspills and sits on the epilame .
    • Why just the bottom mike ? Is it worth polishing the whole arm ?
    • The one thing I took time over was to round and polish the curves at the bottom of the jumper arm. The slightest mark (left over from cutting of filing) acts as a stress raiser, just where you don't need it. 
    • I printed the base and it is a bit too large to fit on the base of the hand setter. The ring bumps into the column so it is unable to full seat on the central ring. I'm going to try removing some of the materal and see if I can't get it to go down.
×
×
  • Create New...