Jump to content

Seiko 2205-0240 Teardown


Recommended Posts

This evenings victim is a Seiko from December of 1970. The only issue other than being a daily wear for some mod rocker back in the day is the crown has no click. Winding, time and date changes as normal but something is amiss in the keyless work.

 IMG_2568.thumb.JPG.d62cc25f695336a7d5f8570557c25219.JPG

IMG_2583.thumb.JPG.6f3573bd0bba4c607ee0f821587be26f.JPG

My fabulous-ly inexpensive tool for unscrewing casebacks will not shrink small enough to capture the grooves so a moments thought and some rearranging of the bits allows us to get started.

IMG_2584.thumb.JPG.d05ff480dedd8148d6bde5ea94cd14cc.JPG

Checking the inside of the back for service marks shows no entry, screw heads seem undisturbed by other rookies such as myself and of course I have forgotten to set the time to allow easy removal of the hands. Reinserting the crown and stem and using hand pullers with plastic bag leaves the dial in pretty good shape even with my clumsy handling. 


IMG_2586.thumb.JPG.c573849996798d9b6d16538baf5bb725.JPG

IMG_2592.thumb.JPG.0fcaba9fafd9f0a58f5bf20deb407b40.JPG

IMG_2593.thumb.JPG.ea3dd55569fcf1a517c74e0c354e1d29.JPG

IMG_2595.thumb.JPG.db4f9a0a7a3a62b67f8e93c976854547.JPG

IMG_2596.thumb.JPG.8e973c915be44c09961ff7e273ae318b.JPG

Of course you folks see it although I didn't: the adapter ring is still around the movement barring access to the dial feet screws. Looking around we see two screws at the tip of the tweezers that look like they will do the job. Sure enough the ring drops away and the foot screws can be loosened on either side of of the dial. 

 

IMG_2596a.thumb.JPG.73d1e658c42edb6eebda153416d413f8.JPG

IMG_2597.thumb.JPG.8f5c639ab5c7aaa9c0707fb1b4df05be.JPG

IMG_2598.thumb.JPG.80634e9497bc69a532d586444a9e7996.JPG

IMG_2602.thumb.JPG.31af4226a49ed437a6d13740aef85b39.JPG

Removing the dial while looking for a washer underneath we see the broken spring end laying on the date wheel. Of course all this manipulation without a movement holder will probably cause more trouble later. But at least without the dial getting squished we now secure this tiny movement a little more properly.

IMG_2604.thumb.JPG.aa673711c164b6367acacee784f0d2a5.JPG

IMG_2605.thumb.JPG.e9d0b8df8d827563043b0e5bc14caf61.JPG

IMG_2608.thumb.JPG.624967bf98ca25fa2bf0ea4625bdc303.JPG

Removing the weight reveals the winding mechanism. Depressing button just above the crown allows stem to be replaced, then held while holding the click just below the stem to take the small residual power away after all this abuse. Amplitude seems quite minimal but not unexpected since I've probably squished things pretty good a few times up to this point. 

Feeling pretty intimidated at this point, put everything away until tomorrow night. See you then!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The click on these is Seiko's typical sheet steel. I had a 4205 (similar except the 4205 uses a balance bridge, not a cock) where the part the holds the ratchet wheel was worn and not holding back the ratchet wheel. I gently bent the click into a 'V' shape to bring it in closer and problem solved. I usually have organ donors for other Seiko movements but not for these.

Something you might consider if yours is similarly worn.

Anilv

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok thanks Ross, I will give that a try!😁
    • Welcome my friend. 
    • Been there. Worn that Tshirt.  'ping'. Hands and knees. Nothing. Nada. 20 minutes? Ha! I found it 7 month later. How? Well, after advice from a member, I invested in a £4 UV light torch.  Hands and knees looking for a 'ping' from a Sekonda, found them both within 30 seconds. UV makes the jewel shine. easy peasy. Could have taken longer. Just lucky on the location of the search. Hope this helps.
    • Thanks Dell. I thought about silver soldering. Have never done it but would like to give it a go. Do you think to put flux on the butted joint then run the solder in or to maybe brace it with a piece of scrap spring steel?
    • Never and others. Yes, like you I do spend a fair amount of time reading the contents of this forum. I find it better that any other. Clear, lucid, no Prima Donas, and most of all an easy access without adverts. All thanks to Mark. God bless you mate. You give so much to many of us. What if? No Mark? Hypothetically. A forum. I did run a forum for a few years. Really enjoyed it, but became so engrossed that it did affect my health. I gave to to others to run. Not been back. It was very successful and rivalled a number of large paying sites. No adverts, no others but me. I did ask and listen to members comments and it worked well.    Costs Having a domain name, £10 annually.  Register the site with a forum company, free. Build the site using the forum company guide lines, free. It looked and ran almost the same a Mark's. All the same facilities. The cost was only £5 per month, but counted visits (views). If I recall, it was that price for 5,000 views. Each extra 5,000 views increased the price by £2 per month. Success was my own personal undoing. From £5 per month initially, it rose to £60 a month and looked like increasing. This was 10 years ago. I could not afford that, and asked it anyone would like to take over and someone did. I would assume that this is the price that Mark is funding for us all. His return is our continued comments on the internet about his course, and the fact that many of the big names on YouTube mention him as their Tutor. Those of us who have done, and are still using, his course, benefit. In comparison to other courses, I can't believe how cheap it is, and the value is exceptional. It is the structure that gives the value. Long may Mark reign. Ross  
×
×
  • Create New...