Jump to content

Seiko 2205-0240 Teardown


Recommended Posts

This evenings victim is a Seiko from December of 1970. The only issue other than being a daily wear for some mod rocker back in the day is the crown has no click. Winding, time and date changes as normal but something is amiss in the keyless work.

 IMG_2568.thumb.JPG.d62cc25f695336a7d5f8570557c25219.JPG

IMG_2583.thumb.JPG.6f3573bd0bba4c607ee0f821587be26f.JPG

My fabulous-ly inexpensive tool for unscrewing casebacks will not shrink small enough to capture the grooves so a moments thought and some rearranging of the bits allows us to get started.

IMG_2584.thumb.JPG.d05ff480dedd8148d6bde5ea94cd14cc.JPG

Checking the inside of the back for service marks shows no entry, screw heads seem undisturbed by other rookies such as myself and of course I have forgotten to set the time to allow easy removal of the hands. Reinserting the crown and stem and using hand pullers with plastic bag leaves the dial in pretty good shape even with my clumsy handling. 


IMG_2586.thumb.JPG.c573849996798d9b6d16538baf5bb725.JPG

IMG_2592.thumb.JPG.0fcaba9fafd9f0a58f5bf20deb407b40.JPG

IMG_2593.thumb.JPG.ea3dd55569fcf1a517c74e0c354e1d29.JPG

IMG_2595.thumb.JPG.db4f9a0a7a3a62b67f8e93c976854547.JPG

IMG_2596.thumb.JPG.8e973c915be44c09961ff7e273ae318b.JPG

Of course you folks see it although I didn't: the adapter ring is still around the movement barring access to the dial feet screws. Looking around we see two screws at the tip of the tweezers that look like they will do the job. Sure enough the ring drops away and the foot screws can be loosened on either side of of the dial. 

 

IMG_2596a.thumb.JPG.73d1e658c42edb6eebda153416d413f8.JPG

IMG_2597.thumb.JPG.8f5c639ab5c7aaa9c0707fb1b4df05be.JPG

IMG_2598.thumb.JPG.80634e9497bc69a532d586444a9e7996.JPG

IMG_2602.thumb.JPG.31af4226a49ed437a6d13740aef85b39.JPG

Removing the dial while looking for a washer underneath we see the broken spring end laying on the date wheel. Of course all this manipulation without a movement holder will probably cause more trouble later. But at least without the dial getting squished we now secure this tiny movement a little more properly.

IMG_2604.thumb.JPG.aa673711c164b6367acacee784f0d2a5.JPG

IMG_2605.thumb.JPG.e9d0b8df8d827563043b0e5bc14caf61.JPG

IMG_2608.thumb.JPG.624967bf98ca25fa2bf0ea4625bdc303.JPG

Removing the weight reveals the winding mechanism. Depressing button just above the crown allows stem to be replaced, then held while holding the click just below the stem to take the small residual power away after all this abuse. Amplitude seems quite minimal but not unexpected since I've probably squished things pretty good a few times up to this point. 

Feeling pretty intimidated at this point, put everything away until tomorrow night. See you then!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The click on these is Seiko's typical sheet steel. I had a 4205 (similar except the 4205 uses a balance bridge, not a cock) where the part the holds the ratchet wheel was worn and not holding back the ratchet wheel. I gently bent the click into a 'V' shape to bring it in closer and problem solved. I usually have organ donors for other Seiko movements but not for these.

Something you might consider if yours is similarly worn.

Anilv

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh nice. I have a similar wedge style stump for my staking tool, so I'll give that a shot. Thanks!
    • Thank you all for the replies!  Very informative! True enough, the Gamsol took some time to evaporate and does leave a residue. So not all naphtha are created equal!  Need to find alternatives then. i was able to try Hexane recommended by Alex and it seems great.  I wonder what the cons are?
    • Yeah, I saw that in the tech sheet but I don't see how it can be adequately cleaned with the friction pinion still in place. I've accidentally pulled the arbor right out of the wheel once when I used a presto tool to try and remove it. Mark shows how he does it with the Platax tool. Those are a little too pricey for me so I got one of these from Aliexpress and I just push down on the arbor with the end of my brass tweezers. That usually gets it most of the way out and then I just grab the wheel with one hand the and the friction pinion with the other and gently rotate them until it pops off. Probably not the best way but it's seemed to work for me so far.    
    • Thanks, Jon Sounds like a plan. Obviously I'll have the face on so do you think gripping with the holder will create any problems, but I will check in the morning to see how feasible it is but I assume it only needs to be lightly held. As for holding the movement instead of the holder won't be possible in this scenario as one hand will be puling on the stem while the other pushes the spring down. That was my initial concern is how the hell can I do this with only one pair of hands. All the other times I've had to remove the stem hasn't been a problem, apart from the force required to release the stem from the setting lever, but now I need to fit the face and hands its sent me into panic mode. If it had the screw type release things would be a lot simpler but that's life 😀   Another thing I will need to consider is once the dial and hands are fitted and the movement is sitting in the case I will need to turn it over to put the case screws in. I saw a vid on Wristwatch revival where he lightly fitted the crystal and bezel so he could turn it over, is this the only option or is there another method?      
    • Hi Jon, do You think that relation spring torque - amplitude is linear? I would rather guess that the amplitude should be proportional to the square of the torque. I had once idea to check it, but still haven't.
×
×
  • Create New...